DawgTalkers.net Forums Active Threads

Could it be...

New Head Coach: Nate ScheelhaaseNate or Grant Udinkski

OC: Todd Monken

DC: Jim Schwartz

Browns head coach process gets bombshell update from ESPN insider

Jaylon Tyson has played better and better as the year has gone on. I suspect that a lot of teams are booting themselves in the backside for passing on him.

I think we should all remind ourselves that Tua is one concussion away from being permanently cross-eyed.

Could the CAVS have really got them a SUPERSTAR? Jaylen Tison uppppped his game tonight. If you didnt see the game you need to watch this game, WOW, this kid will be a SUPERSTAR. Watch the postgame and D Mitchell, his immediate postgame interview, he was overly complimentary to Jaylen Tison. And the CAVS just beat the Sixers in back to back games.

Well, we could benefit from either a better band-aid and/or a permanent solution.

We've been trying to time the draft and tank for the higher picks for what feels like forever (or maybe we're not trying and it just came naturally). I'm kinda over thinking like that. Just build the team and the QB situation becomes incrementally easier to sort out (better supporting cast puts less pressure on the QB position).

This has gotta be a sign that Browns era of misery is over, right?

I am perfectly fine with taking another late-round flyer on a QB who falls and low-risk FA signings. I'm also a fan of the current trend of QB reclamation projects.

Trey Lance will be a FA. He is a former high pick and spent a LOT of time with Shanny. I believe the injury bug derailed his career so it'd be pertinent to know if that's past him.

What about Tua? We can't afford him with Watson still dragging down the cap, but he could benefit from a change of scenery.


Obviously, all of this is just spitballing until we at least know who our OC is going to be.

Because she knows giving him a shiny trincket well get him on her side
So easy to manipulate

An observation/lack of observation worth asking is:

When did the cop pull his gun?
I coould have missed it, but I never saw him draw his gun
Suggesting that he already had it out well before he fired - why?
Suggests that he was eager to(for lack of a better word) to shoot someone

Berry must use free agency wisely to improve the offense.

In the draft play it strategically. Get first round picks for next year. Then go BPA heavy on offense.

So much depends on who the head coach is. That is why they should hire an offensive head coach.

Schwartz is getting the first second interview. He has to have a strong offensive plan to get the job.

I would like to get McDaniel because we are going to build a dome team. Speed is the game. He schemed Tua to deliver a zone passing scheme. It fit Tua's strength to throw off a three step drop and throw in Tua's comfort zone. Areas where he could throw accurately because Tua was limited as a passer.

I don't know about any Schwartz and McDaniel relationship or if the Browns could make that happen?

Maybe if you were my aunt and had a set, you could be my uncle too. But I can't think of any scenario where you would be my dad and tell me to post about Jan 6, or any other crazy idea you have for what I should post. Nor can I think of a scenario where you actually have a set.


Crap! Well thanks for the reminder!

Maybe it's time you stop worrying about if men can get pregnant and spend sometime explaining why Trump pardoned those that attacked the Capital on Jan 6, 2021. Or maybe why he pardoned the former Pres of Honduras but went after the Pres of Venezuela. Or maybe you can discuss the stupidity of threatening our allies and saying he'll not rule out attacking Greenland?

At least those issues have impact on Americans...

But no,, You'll probably talk about his receiving the Nobel Participation Prize!? Yeah, that one will really set the stage for a fun debate.....

Right now, in our QB room it is what it is. Maybe we can sign Malik Willis maybe not. I wouldn't count on it. Maybe we pull a rabbit out of the hat with Drew Allar or Carson Beck. Do you want to put your money on it? I don't. IMO keep trying to develop SS. Keep DW, although I'm not crazy about the idea, you're paying him anyway, and draft a QB in the 3rd or 4th round to compete with DG for 3rd string. Try and trade down for another #1 for "27 and use draft picks and FA to improve our weaknesses. I don't see much else we can do. One thing more. I believe Pit is right about you draft the QB first and then build around him but we are not in that position. Besides, WE are the Browns, and we like to do things differently and show everyone how smart we can be.

And any dumb ass knows you don't continue shooting at someone once there is no longer a threat. Some of you keep trying to make excuses for those second and third shots when there is none.

That's YOU talking. A quote from your post. Post number 2131121

And any dumb ass knows you don't continue shooting at someone once there is no longer a threat. Some of you keep trying to make excuses for those second and third shots when there is none.

That's YOU talking. A quote from your post.

Right now, I take SS over DG. Showed more, but I’m not convinced Sanders is the guy.

No problem. It's the first thing I thought of when I read those tweets. It seems like destiny. Like a match made in heaven..... I mean hell.

Epic, loved that! I laughed better than I have in weeks, thanks man

And fate makes it even funnier with that meme thing!

You need to find a quote on that. FATE said he was certain the first shot was the kill shot, not me. I said it may have been but we don't know.

And how does that change anything? I do understand the first shot. I've said that all along. Whether or not the first shot killed her or not doesn't change the circumstances of shots two and three. When an officer, or anyone of us for that matter, fires a weapon at someone we are responsible that we shot that weapon in a responsible manner and at the time that weapon was fired we had a reasonable fear for our life. That's whether that person with the shot or not.

Once again, reporting the doctors findings is not an argument.



That's just a flat out lie that you are making up out of thin air.

It appears you can't comprehend that clarifying his injuries were not serious helps clear up some of the accusations being launched by both sides of this discussion. And my saying he was injured I'm agreeing with you that he did in fact go to the hospital. Agreeing with you isn't staring an argument.

Yes at some point he was sent to the hospital. There is a video showing him walking away from the shooting scene immediately after the incident. Nothing appeared abnormal. That once again is not an argument. It's a point of fact.

The only thing it seems you are all worked up about is that I brought into question the extent of his injuries. This after Noem trying to dramatize and put his injuries in the worst possible light. After trump claiming she "ran over him". None of which you even offered to comment on.

Now suddenly, even after me agreeing with some your points you act like a child about it. That explains exactly how your brain works.

Now shut up.

Opposite, ship Sanders, keep Gabriel- you lose all the drama with Sanders. Wonder if anyone wants either.

Earlier in this thread, you said the first shot was the "kill" shot.

Later in this thread you said "I understand the first shot".

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney just announced that he is demanding the immediate turnover of Alaska to Canada for national security reasons.

Look dude, I have no idea how your brain works but I know it's just wired to create arguments from thin air.

One poster inferred he wasn't really injured because he never even went to the hospital. I simply stated there was nothing about that in the article... because there wasn't. Don't know if he just likes making ish up or what -- don't care.


Your response was that Noem sent him home.


I have no flipping idea what that has to do with the conversation. I've tried to explain that. At this point you must be taking pleasure in wasting my time.

I'm not here to argue the severity of his injuries or what a flipping bruise is. On a scale of 1-10 I care about -4. I never said his injuries were severe, never even hinted at it. I simply stated to a poster -- one that posted what is most likely a lie -- that their article is b.s.

You've tried to move the argument in three different directions since then.

If this were a blind date, I'd already be suing you for harassment. Nothing you have said has made any sense, yet you're still blabbering nonsense.

Shut. Up.