DawgTalkers.net Forums Active Threads

The war with Iran was a stupid move but now we are on the hook for the fallout if he can’t secure a win. And laughably talking heads say we won’t see $3 gas again until 2032…

Deperation has now sunk in.

That's really as far as I need to go with this. If in fact he was telling the truth about setting Iran's nuclear program back several years if not decades, that would mean there was zero need for war with Iran for at least years from now. You have just displayed what desperation looks like.

Thanks for playing. You will receive the board game of Risk as a consolation prize.

1. Which time he was lying is unimportant.

1.There seems to be a bit of confusion here. We both agree trump lies on a regular basis. What we don't know is which time he lied. In June of 2025 he stated he set back Iran's nuclear program by several years if not decades. Eight months later he claimed later he needed to start a war because they were on the verge of developing a nuclear weapon. What we do know for sure is that in one of those cases he lied. What we don't know is which time he was lying and which time he was telling the truth.


2.That's already been explained to you. First one would have to be naive enough to think that both Israel and the U.S. would not have any surveillance tracking airplanes leaving Iran headed towards Israel or the U.S. and track them. The only other way they would have at accomplish that would be transferring that payload through other nations airport security including our own.


3.You keep repeating that over and over again without any evidence to support it. Assassinating my character but not the facts I've posted. That's pretty weak.


4.Yet according to everything we've heard our border was wide open until trump took office and now it is totally secure. So what happened while it was wide open again? You just keep finding more rabbit holes to climb down. I get it. You'll say, "Just because it hasn't happened yet doesn't mean it wont happen." And I'll say if it didn't happen when the border was wide open there's even less of a chance of it happening now that it's much more secure. And the beat goes on.


5.Which in no way changes or makes a scenario of how to deliver a nuclear device to the U.S.


6.These are the words of a war monger who has reached the point of using hyperbole and unlikely scenarios as an excuse for war. Fear tactics do not make a cause for war.


7. Really? Here is a quote from one of your previous posts.....



8. I think you underestimate it. There is also satellite surveillance.

You see, on one hand you pose this immediate nuclear threat from Iran to be deployed on the U.S. You propose methods by which they could accomplish and deploy that threat. You point out how they have been yelling death to America for 47 years now. Then on the other hand you propose our own government has done nothing have the ability or wherewithal to have systems in place to prevent that from happening.

What you seem to be suggesting is a 2+2=3 argument.

So mockery was your goal and not word play or a joke. Thanks. It's always good to hear you admit you started off with a false premise.

I thought we both agreed Trump lied. Or do you think he told the truth now?

Which part is far fetched? Iran working with terrorists? Terrorists using planes? Terrorists using bombs? HEU being unmonitored? A country that chants "death to America" targeting America?

The facts you laid out are few and far between. The things you claimed were facts that were actually BS were legion.

Israel is a likely target. Yet, Israel is a densely populated (14 times the population density of the US), not immense area to cover, highly monitored, highly militarized country. On the other hand, our southern border is vast and has unpopulated sections.

You keep talking military, I'm talking (potentially state sponsored) terrorism.

While our country is monitored and militarized, there are gaps in the coverage. While Israel is the closer target, terrorists go for symbolic targets rather than the closest. We are the "softer" target, with a potentially larger "terror" factor. I.e, If they can hit us, they can hit anywhere. Israel has mandatory military service. Much of our population is unaware of the realities of war, and, in the eyes of extremists, we are the much more "decadent" country.

I agree a direct flight is an unlikely scenario. That's why it isn't the scenario I speculated on.

A Gulfstream G700 (private business jet) has a range of ~8,360 miles. A straight line flight between Tehran and Caracas, Venezuela is 7,321 miles (and it doesn't have to be a straight flight, Libya could make some sense as a connecting point, ISIS and AQIM still operate camps in the Fezzan Region.)

Israel has surveillance, yes. Is Israel going to track a private plane going SE away from them and circling around over central Africa then heading west away from Israel? I think you overestimate the abilities of radar and underestimate the number of private jets that fly out of the middle east. It's something I did consider and factored into my hypothetical scenario.

No heavyweights allowed: Troops must meet fitness criteria to attend White House UFC event

Members of the military seeking tickets to the UFC fight on the South Lawn have to meet “all service-specific physical fitness test requirements” and pay their own travel expenses to the event, according to a Pentagon memo.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/wh...fitness-criteria-attend-white-rcna347606

"We think you are fit enough to serve in the military but we don't want the pubic to see you serve in our military.

Thank you for your service."

According to trump he set back their nuclear program by many years of not decades in June of 2025.

You seem to assume that some far fetched conspiracy of how Iran would get a dirty bomb into the U.S. as a reason for war.

The facts I laid out were not made up. They are facts. Rather than address those facts you attack the messenger and claim otherwise with nothing to substantiate that.

Israel is a likely target. Iran has the military capability to carry that out. This manufactured, far fetched plot you have created as to a method to deploy a dirty bomb or nuke to the U.S. is just that and nothing more.

This entire "But they could put it on a jet and fly it directly to the U.S." is a very unlikely scenario to say the least. One would think you feel as though we nor Israel have any surveillance on air traffic that detects aircraft leaving Iranian air space. An obvious detail you either didn't consider or obviously omitted.

I had no idea you were homophoneic. Man that must be tough.