Active Threads | Active Posts | Unanswered Today | Since Yesterday | This Week
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: Iran War II PitDAWG 05/22/26 08:54 PM
Iran formally stopped providing updated nuclear material accountancy reports and access to its nuclear sites, including the location of its enriched uranium stockpiles, in late June 2025. Right after trump bombed their nuclear enrichment sites.

https://isis-online.org/uploads/isi...erification-Report_Final_September-8.pdf

So yet once again trump created a problem and thinks attacking them was the best method to address it? Just curious, do you think it would be smart of Iran to keep providing access and information on it's uranium enrichment program after it was just bombed by the U.S.? There is a legitimate reason for what they are doing and that reason was created by trump.

Iran enriching uranium to 60% has been known since 2021. It's not some new development...........................

Iran first officially announced and was confirmed by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) to be enriching uranium to 60% purity in April 2021.

https://www.sipri.org/commentary/essay/2021/why-iran-producing-60-cent-enriched-uranium

Those two things are not connected.
139 5,578 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: Iran War II Bull_Dawg 05/22/26 08:38 PM
The Iranian Nuclear Program was under constant video surveillance in addition to allowing in person inspections. Now it's not. They were only allowed to enrich uranium to less than 4% for civilian use. Now they're doing at least 60%.

link

They've been capable. They just agreed not to and were watched to ensure they didn't in the past.
139 5,578 Read More
Pure Football Forum Jump to new posts
Re: What If? oobernoober 05/22/26 08:16 PM
Originally Posted by Day of the Dawg
1. If Watson wins the starting job and earned it then he deserves to be the starter. If your on the 53 then best player plays.

[...]

3. If Watson plays good enough for an extension, then yes.

I agree on all your points, but I do think that just because 1 happens doesn't necessarily mean that 3 will happen. I think the likelihood of 1 happening is FAR higher than 3.
3 67 Read More
Pure Football Forum Jump to new posts
Re: Browns announce 2026 schedule PitDAWG 05/22/26 07:41 PM
And the question could become, if Monkin doesn't develop some of that "1st round" talent will it be the fault of Monkin for not developing that talent or will it be the talking heads were wrong about their evaluations on some of those picks?
46 1,732 Read More
Pure Football Forum Jump to new posts
Re: What If? PitDAWG 05/22/26 07:37 PM
That's simply too much to wade through. So I'll keep this short.

First this is a contract year for DW. His future depends on playing well. The gravy train won't be flowing to his door next year if he doesn't play well this season. If after flopping around like a fish washed up on the beach for four years he plays lights out this season, it will only confirm to me that he is who I thought he was.

Secondly, DW never wanted to be here. He had a no trade clause and took the Browns off the list if teams he was willing to be traded to until Haslam backed up the Brinks truck. He came here just for the cash to a destination he didn't want to be in you can bet your ass he's looking to get away from here now.

There are 31 other teams in the league. None of this is as simple as the Browns just giving DW an extension.
3 67 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: Poltical Jokes Part 5 PitDAWG 05/22/26 07:17 PM
Bill Clinton is 79 years old. He was born on August 19, 1946

You posted what Twitter truth looks like. rofl
141 6,431 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: The Dems... again PitDAWG 05/22/26 07:12 PM
And now you deny it when it's one of your own. At least the dems were smart enough to run a different candidate instead of trotting Biden out there again. That's what it looks like when someone realizes their mistake. So maybe you should pay more attention next time instead of doing exactly what you blamed the Democrats of doing. Your shtick is lame.
186 8,200 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: Poltical Jokes Part 5 MemphisBrownie 05/22/26 07:10 PM
141 6,431 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: Iran War II PitDAWG 05/22/26 07:07 PM
I suppose it's more the vagueness in parts of it. What we've witnessed doesn't seem to align with some of your assertions......................

Quote
how (relatively) "easy" (with readily available technology Iran already has access to) it is to make a nuclear device.

I'm not privy to how much or how little technology Iran has access to. I'm sure there are far less advanced technology and far more advanced technology in developing nuclear weapons and it seems as long as it has taken Iran to this point it's been a very slow process.

Quote
The hard part is acquiring the (nuclear) materials. Once you have the materials, a device can come together fast.

Yet once again Iran has had nuclear materials for decades now.

Quote
And since Iran already has a nuclear power plant, uranium enrichment facilities, and rockets....

In 1957, Iran and the US signed a civil nuclear cooperation agreement as part of President Dwight Eisenhower's "Atoms for Peace" program. This led to the construction of Iran's first nuclear research facility at Tehran by the U.S. which was completed in 1967.

The much larger Bushehr Nuclear Power Plant, was completed in 2011. Fifteen years ago. So after fifteen years of having nuclear power Iran still hadn't completed a nuclear weapon.

Iran first had uranium enrichment capability in 2006. Twenty years ago.

Iran first launched ballistic missiles in March 1985, firing Soviet-supplied Scud-B missiles against an Iraqi oil installation near Kirkuk during the Iran-Iraq War. Twenty six years ago.

For something that is supposed to advance so easily after these capabilities are available to a country, this seems to have all been happening at a snails pace. Something about all of that isn't adding up.
139 5,578 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: Poltical Jokes Part 5 MemphisBrownie 05/22/26 06:51 PM
141 6,431 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: The Dems... again MemphisBrownie 05/22/26 06:49 PM
oh, memories.....

186 8,200 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: U.S. creates $1.7B ‘lawfare’ fund in exchange for Trump dropping $10B IRS suit PitDAWG 05/22/26 06:39 PM
If that's the best BS you can make up to justify trump's actions you should just give up now.
27 599 Read More
Pure Football Forum Jump to new posts
Re: What If? Day of the Dawg 05/22/26 05:18 PM
1. If Watson wins the starting job and earned it then he deserves to be the starter. If your on the 53 then best player plays.

2. If Watson starts the season and things go bad then Sanders will again get a shot. If Watson and the team play well then Sanders needs to learn how to be #2.

3. If Watson plays good enough for an extension, then yes.

4. He would clearly be the #2 QB on the roster and if Watson and the team does well they will not be in position to draft another QB so if Sanders continues to develop and does not cause drama he can be #2. Injuries happen how long he stay #2 or when he gets another chance to start that will depend on his performance at that time.

5. If the team is bad and out of the running by the trade deadline I think Garrett will go for a ransom that the FO will use to acquire a new QB in next years draft.
3 67 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: U.S. creates $1.7B ‘lawfare’ fund in exchange for Trump dropping $10B IRS suit Day of the Dawg 05/22/26 05:08 PM
At least tax dollars are going to Americans and not Somalians.
27 599 Read More
Pure Football Forum Jump to new posts
Re: Browns announce 2026 schedule Bull_Dawg 05/22/26 05:07 PM
Originally Posted by mac


Developing the young talent will be the first challenge facing Monken and his coaching staff.

It's nice to have young talent to be developed that is actually "1st round" talented for a change.
46 1,732 Read More
Pure Football Forum Jump to new posts
What If? bonefish 05/22/26 04:59 PM
This has been going on so long it's hard to imagine anything else.

Who is going to be the quarterback?

1.0 What if DW beats out Shedeur and becomes the starter?

2.0 If that happens what is the future for Shedeur and DW?

3.0 Would the Browns seriously consider an extension for DW?

4.0 Would there be a future for Shedeur in Cleveland?

5.0 Will this all lead to moving Myles?

1.0 Early reports are DW has an edge. It is still too early. However, IMO Monken will move quickly because he wants his starter to get the reps in a new offense. If he does DW will need to stay healthy and get positive results.

2.0 If Shedeur cannot win this job then his value to the team goes down. He needs to win the job and show improvement in order to retain the job. If DW wins the job and keeps it through the season. His future with the team will depend upon how well he plays.

3.0 It would be hard to imagine DW getting an extension. However, if he was really good and the team won a lot of games and won playoff games. Yes, an extension would not be out of the question.

4.0 IMO Shedeur has to win the job and then play well. He has to win games and demonstrate that he can become a true franchise quarterback. If not his future with the team would be in doubt.

5.0 Myles is most likely going nowhere. If the season goes down the tubes and the team wins like 4 games or less. They will have a high draft pick. For Myles to be traded by the Browns IMO they would have to see a difficult path to a quarterback in the draft.

============================================================================

Let's discuss without snide remarks and personal attacks a real football discussion.
3 67 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: Iran War II Bull_Dawg 05/22/26 04:38 PM
I have a hard time understanding what you're taking issue with in the quote. It seems a fairly straight forward laying out of the situation.

I accept that part of the reasoning, I think. I don't really see a reason given in the quote. But, If you're implying removing nuclear capability from a terroristic regime was the reason, sure. (I'm not sure if the public reasons were Trump's actual reasons)

Planning and execution were pathetic. (Which could perhaps be partially explained if the actual reasons were different. I.e, personal financial, distraction, or machismo-- which would all be awful reasons)

There's also just the very real possibility that there are idiots in positions of power now that don't understand how things actually work.
139 5,578 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: Iran War II PitDAWG 05/22/26 04:08 PM
I fully understand that part of what you have posted and we certainly agree to that extent. 100% agree.

This is the portion I'm taking issue with...........

Originally Posted by Bull_Dawg
I don't think people really understand how (relatively) "easy" (with readily available technology Iran already has access to) it is to make a nuclear device. It's not some super complex, decade spanning process. The hard part is acquiring the (nuclear) materials. Once you have the materials, a device can come together fast. And since Iran already has a nuclear power plant, uranium enrichment facilities, and rockets....

This, while it's only one of the reasons trump used to start a war with Iran, it was certainly a top reason given. It's as if you have accepted and endorse that part of the reasoning to have started all of this as I'm understanding it but I may be wrong. That's why they questions I'm posing are related to this specifically.
139 5,578 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: U.S. creates $1.7B ‘lawfare’ fund in exchange for Trump dropping $10B IRS suit PitDAWG 05/22/26 03:59 PM
Well they had to be sent a clear message of how they would not only be pardoned for their actions if they commit crimes in support of trump but given cash rewards. I mean there is another election coming up in less than six months. They needed to be reminded what to do if they lost.
27 599 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: Iran War II Bull_Dawg 05/22/26 03:58 PM
You think I'm saying one thing while I'm actually saying the opposite. I'm saying Trump, if anything, has made things worse.

"International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) oversight in Iran remains significantly constrained. Following military strikes on several Iranian nuclear facilities in mid-2025, Tehran suspended cooperation and blocked access to key locations. Despite an agreement in principle between the IAEA and Iran to resume inspections, monitoring efforts face major hurdles." (Google nuclear inspection in Iran)

Outside agencies don't know where the nuclear material is right now.

edit: Personally, that seems pretty important.
139 5,578 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: Iran War II PitDAWG 05/22/26 03:53 PM
They were monitored until trump made sure they were no longer monitored.

To claim they're "on the verge" that must mean that somehow you have determined which statement trump made that was a lie and which one of those statements was true. You must have also determined that after 30 years of Netanyahu lying about Iran being close to a nuclear weapon that this is finally the time he is telling the truth.

For someone who claims that they don't trust anyone it seems odd you now seem to be putting trust in Netanyahu who has been lying about this for decades and or trump who has told you two opposite stories about this in eight months.

Or maybe it's just a belief you have come to on your own. But if that's the case do you have anything that would be basis in factual evidence to support your belief?

As I've stated before, those pieces have been in pace for quite some time now. None of that has changed in several years.
139 5,578 Read More
Pure Football Forum Jump to new posts
Re: Browns News 6.0 Day of the Dawg 05/22/26 03:46 PM
Originally Posted by MemphisBrownie
Deshaun Watson is emerging as the No. 1 storyline of the Browns’ season

It’s been 579 days since Deshaun Watson received a shotgun snap, dropped back two short steps and buckled to the ground without contact.

Turning over on his knees, Watson pressed face-down on the ground with his hands wrapped on each side of his helmet, anguished by the numbing pain of a ruptured right Achilles tendon and another giant obstacle to a once-promising career thrown in front of him.

As Watson was carted off Huntington Bank Field, he cried into a towel covering his face. Some Browns fans who never accepted him as their team’s quarterback shamefully cheered his exit. Not the entire audience, but enough to be heard by players on the Browns’ sideline.

“We need to do better as fans for having some empathy for a man who’s doing the best he can, and did the best he can up to this point,” Myles Garrett said after the game. “No one deserves that. He plays the game as hard as anyone I’ve seen. Puts everything on the line, willing to throw his body out there and be there and he plays the game at 100 mph. There’s a risk that you can be injured, and he took that risk.”

Many believed that was the last Watson would be seen in a Browns uniform, that the team would eat the remaining two years on his fully-guaranteed $230 million contract and turn the page on a franchise-altering acquisition gone awry.

But after two surgeries on the Achilles tendon, after owner Jimmy Haslam attested the March, 2022 mega-trade for Watson was “a swing and a miss,” and after four quarterbacks were drafted by the Browns and two other veteran passers were acquired, Watson is on a path to reclaiming the starting job.

A comeback story in the making?

It is premature to say that Watson will be the Browns’ starting QB when they open the season on September 13 in Jacksonville, FL. It is only May.

The team has seven OTA practices, three in a mandatory minicamp, and then a full training camp, two joint practices with the Buffalo Bills, and three preseason games before Todd Monken presents his first official depth chart as Browns coach.

But Watson clearly is winning the confidence and respect of those who have seen him work his way back during 15 months of solitary physical – and mental – rehab. He’s been unseen, mostly, behind closed doors as the Browns plundered onward without him.

“I think it’s really cool,” Monken said after the team’s OTA practice on Wednesday. “Here’s a guy that at this point has made plenty of money – I think we all know that. He’s had plenty of success and has had disappointment in his career, a number of things he couldn’t control from an injury standpoint. But to come back and want to battle, want to further his career and change the narrative, I think it’s really cool.”

Changing the narrative

The narrative is that Watson should never have been acquired in the first place, after civil lawsuits filed by more than two dozen licensed massage therapists alleged sexual misconduct. The complaints resulted in an 11-game NFL suspension to start Watson’s career with the Browns. (All civil suits have been dismissed or settled.)

The narrative is that after playing only 19 of a possible 68 games for the Browns, Watson will never justify the trade and the unprecedented contract given him.

The narrative is that the trade cost of six overall draft picks, including first-rounders in three consecutive years – and the salary cap consequences of his contract — set back the franchise’s development for five-plus years.

The narrative is that playing Watson now, in the final year of his contract, will only stall the development of, and commitment to, Shedeur Sanders – arguably the team’s most popular player and Watson’s No. 1 competitor for the starting job.

But Monken’s arrival as new Browns coach might have been the best thing to happen to Watson in his five seasons in Cleveland. Monken doesn’t have the pre-conceived notions that blind fans from seeing the possibilities of a supremely athletic quarterback rediscovering a game that deserted him for six long years.

In March, Haslam said, “Deshaun has a great chance, [a] fresh start [with an] offensive-minded coach, who has, in his past, been able to work with all kinds of different quarterbacks and make him successful. So Deshaun has a great chance to do that now.”

Five weeks later, in an appearance on 850 ESPN Cleveland’s Really Big Show, J.W. Johnson, Browns managing partner, said, unprompted, “Deshaun looks great, by the way. He’s done a great job. He looks healthy. He’s in a great headspace. We’ll see how it all shakes out. There is an ongoing competition, but, you know, he’s got nothing to lose and if he’s our starting quarterback, I know there are people that probably won’t be supportive, but they need to be supportive as much as they can.”

During the offseason workouts which are now culminating in OTA practices, Monken, who was two-time MVP Lamar Jackson’s offensive coordinator the past three seasons in Baltimore, has marveled at Watson’s athletic ability.

“Deshaun’s athleticism shows up,” Monken said. “Obviously he’s had that, but he’s had injuries that have set him back. I wouldn’t say it’s a surprise, but it’s exciting to see. It’s a weapon for him. It’s one of his superpowers, his athleticism.”

It’s impossible to say whether Watson can pull off what may be one of the NFL’s most improbable comebacks. His last good season was 2020, when he led the NFL with 4,823 passing yards and tossed 33 touchdowns vs. 7 interceptions in his final season with the Houston Texans.

“The year before we signed him, he was the second-best quarterback in NFL,” Haslam said. “And then the suspension and the injuries and all that piled up. Can he come back from that? He certainly had the ability at one point in time, and we’re cautiously optimistic.”

Watson has not been heard from since the day of his career-altering injury on October 20, 2024.

The Browns top public relations executive has been sensitive to the potentially polarizing prospect of playing one of the franchise’s most despised – for lack of a better word – players ahead of one of its most popular players.

At some point soon, Watson will be exposed to media questions about his mindset, his feelings towards Browns fans who cheered his demise, his determination to reclaim his career.

There is always quarterback drama with the Browns. Right now, Deshaun Watson has become the No. 1 storyline of the 2026 season.

https://thelandondemand.com/grossi/...the-no-1-storyline-of-the-browns-season/

If Watson wins the starting job week 2 Baker vs Watson and week 13 vs Stefanski and the Falcons will be even more interesting.
363 37,864 Read More
Pure Football Forum Jump to new posts
Re: Browns announce 2026 schedule mac 05/22/26 03:43 PM
First time in 10 years that the Browns have operated withOUT the influence of a Baseball driven management system calling the shots.

Don't expect miracles from Monken immediately as this coaching staff will have growing pains until they gain experience working together.

Developing the young talent will be the first challenge facing Monken and his coaching staff.
46 1,732 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: Iran War II Bull_Dawg 05/22/26 03:43 PM
Originally Posted by PitDAWG
Yet it has had all of these things for a very long time now. I'm still not sure why nobody seems to address this. In June of 2025 after the initial bombing trump stated he had "obliterated Iran's nuclear capability". That he had set it back "many years if not decades".

Only eight months later he claimed they were on the verge of having a nuclear weapon.

Benjamin Netanyahu has been consistently warning that Iran is on the verge of developing a nuclear weapon for over 30 years. Throughout this period, he has frequently stated that Iran is only months or a few years away from a bomb.

So considering they have had the materials to build a nuclear weapon for all that time and still haven't managed to do it. After having heard The Boy who Cried Wolf for decades now and considering we were told two entirely opposite stories within an eight month time period, color me skeptical.

Yes, Trump is frequently lying about the efficacy of what he does.

They are "on the verge." If we allow them, they could very quickly.

They haven't because there is/had been oversight. The nuclear material has been closely monitored. Yet, the pieces are in place to allow rapid manufacture.
139 5,578 Read More
Palus Politicus Jump to new posts
Re: U.S. creates $1.7B ‘lawfare’ fund in exchange for Trump dropping $10B IRS suit bonefish 05/22/26 03:42 PM
So, traitors who tried to stop the transfer of power because they lost the election now know their criminal actions can result in a paycheck.

Criminals who pleaded guilty and were convicted. Criminals who assaulted policemen.

ICE agents can commit murder with government approval.

What a surprise under a twice impeached felon who would be in prison if he was not the president.
27 599 Read More
Page 1 of 31 1 2 3 30 31
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5