Re: Grant Delpit Extended: 3-years, $48M
FATE
07/29/26 09:29 PM
Love, love, love.
Love his story and how he fought back from a career-threatening injury before he ever took the field and love that he has improved every year.
Last year he was a force and played the best ball of his career. Stacked versatility with elite (some may argue) plays in space. Top that off with becoming an excellent blitzer.
I'm glad we locked them both up ahead of schedule.
3
55
Read More
|
|
Re: Watson vs Sanders?
YTownBrownsFan
07/29/26 09:12 PM
Something tells me Green mysteriously finds his way on IR by the end of training camp! I doubt that. I think Monken is licking his lips thinking of the trick plays he can use Green in.
61
2,163
Read More
|
|
Re: Watson vs Sanders?
bonefish
07/29/26 08:11 PM
DG will get the reps that 3rd string players get.
He is not in the mix. In fact he might be traded. I think they want Green as their 3rd string guy because they could have packages for him in certain situations.
DW and SS will split the first team reps. IMO both will play in pre-season games.
It's go time. By the end of August we will have a starter.
I am not in doom and gloom or giddy with excitement.
My attitude is "let it all happen."
After they play four or so regular games I think we will have a good idea of what we have.
I find myself rooting for Monken. Guys like him don't often get this chance. I wish him well.
61
2,163
Read More
|
|
Re: The Dems... again
PitDAWG
07/29/26 08:00 PM
And in some cases that's true. Here is where that isn't valid.
You can still plead the Fifth if there is a threat of new charges, state crimes, or potential future perjury.
So if Faucci believes or has a reasonable cause to believe that if he states the wrong date that something happened or slips up in any way or detail about the sequence if events about questions asked may lead to future charges such as perjury, he does still have the right to plead the 5th.
357
19,604
Read More
|
|
Re: The Dems... again
Pdawg
07/29/26 07:53 PM
The difference is Fauci already has immunity from prosecution because of his pardon. At least that is what is being said.
357
19,604
Read More
|
|
Re: Watson vs Sanders?
Homewood Dog
07/29/26 07:51 PM
Irish, if a shoe company could add a few inches to a person's height and comfortably, they would add millions to their profits and I'm not just talking athletes. I know many people that would like to be taller!! LOL!!
61
2,163
Read More
|
|
Re: The Dems... again
PitDAWG
07/29/26 07:08 PM
Yes, people have a constitutional right to plead the Fifth Amendment before Congress. The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that the privilege against self-incrimination applies to congressional hearings just as it does in criminal court cases. A witness can refuse to answer questions if the truthful response might incriminate them or furnish evidence for a future criminal prosecution.
How the Right Works in Congress;
Applies to Hearings: Witnesses subpoenaed by congressional committees can legally invoke the protection.
Broad Protection: It covers answers that directly incriminate a person or provide a link in a chain of evidence leading to a criminal charge.
No Criminal Penalty: Congress cannot punish a witness or hold them in contempt solely for properly invoking their Fifth Amendment right to avoid self-incrimination.
Important Limits and Rules
Must Be Genuine Risk: A witness must have a real, reasonable fear of criminal liability. They cannot use it just to avoid embarrassment or political discomfort.
Cannot Pick and Choose Selectively: Testifying about a topic can sometimes be viewed as waiving the right. Once a witness starts answering questions in an area, they might not be able to invoke the Fifth on related details within that same area.
Perjury Still Applies: Pleading the Fifth protects past actions, but lying under oath about what you do say can lead to perjury charges.
Yeah, good luck with that. Just more political grandstanding.
357
19,604
Read More
|
|
Re: Browns News cont.
IrishDawg42
07/29/26 07:03 PM
These deals didn't change any money for 2026. What it did was extend Ward, who was already signed through 2027, through 2029. All new money is coming in years 27-29, When we get some relief on Watson's deal. I think what this tells me is, the Browns will be all in on a rookie QB or One of the (3) already on the roster in Sanders, Gabriel and Green, who are all on low money rookie deals. Sanders and Gabriel will be coming off their rookie deals in 2029, which is the last year of these contracts and Green is signed through 2030, if he makes the roster. Delpit is a new 3 year deal that commences in 2027 and runs through 2029. Myles money is only half of what it would have been in 2027, so some of his money was probably calculated into these deals. Verse is still on his rookie deal through 2027 and then the 5th year option in 2028, so I don't really know of any player now that is in line for a new deal by the end of this year OR the next. I think everyone is signed through 2028. Jerry Jeudy and Watson are the only other major players with expiring contracts before 2028, Watson after this year and Jeudy after 2027, which right now I don't see him getting extended..Some minor contracts that can be looked at are Maliek Collins and special teams. Collins is 31 now, so he probably isn't in the future plans for the Browns. Only other one of note is Dawand Jones, who I don't think anyone is losing sleep over.
94
7,719
Read More
|
|
|
|