ICE officer charged in Minneapolis shooting released in Texas after immediate extradition rejected
BROWNSVILLE, Texas (AP) â An Immigration and Customs Enforcement officer charged with shooting a man and lying about it during the immigration crackdown in Minneapolis was released from a Texas jail Thursday, after a judge refused to order his return to Minnesota.
Christian Castro was released at the break of dawn from a detention center in Brownsville. He motioned his hand toward a few camera operators and a reporter crowding around him and quickly got into an SUV that drove off.
A day earlier, U.S. District Judge Fernando Rodriguez Jr. wrote in an order that said he couldnât prevent a county sheriff from releasing Castro or order Texas Gov. Greg Abbott to sign his extradition warrant.
Castro is charged in Minnesota with assault and falsely reporting a crime in the Jan. 14 shooting of 24-year-old Julio Cesar Sosa-Celis.
Castro is accused of firing gun through door of home
Castro is accused of firing a gun through the front door of a Minneapolis home, shooting Sosa-Celis in the leg. Prosecutors say Castro also falsely accused Sosa-Celis and another man of attacking an ICE officer with a broom handle and a snow shovel.
After a Minnesota judge issued a nationwide warrant for Castroâs arrest in May, authorities, including Minnesotaâs Bureau of Criminal Apprehension, arrested Castro in Cameron County on May 29. Minnesota authorities have sought his extradition since his arrest, but he remained in custody in Brownsville, a city bordering Mexico.
Under Texas law and barring extradition, Castro had to be released after 90 days of detention, which was Thursday.
Minnesota officials believe Castro could flee to Mexico.
Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison filed a request for a temporary restraining order last week seeking to block Castroâs release or to order his return to Minnesota.
Abbott waiting for internal state investigation about Castro
Texas attorneys on Tuesday argued the judge could not rule on a decision thatâs still pending. Abbott has not denied the extradition. Instead he is waiting for the outcome of an internal state investigation considering whether Castro was legally a âfugitiveâ under the Extradition Clause, the lawyers said.
The judge wrote in Wednesdayâs order that the court couldnât yet step in.
âThe Court concludes that it lacks subject matter jurisdiction because the case is not ripe for adjudication,â the order read. âMinnesota cannot premise its causes of action on the allegation that Governor Abbott may violate those authorities in the future; it must prove that a violation has already occurred.â
The judge said in his order that the extradition laws do not outline how long the Texas governor can take to make that decision.
Abbott said last week he would not respond to the extradition request, citing the ongoing investigation into fraud in government social service programs in Minnesota, which President Donald Trump used to justify his immigration crackdown there.
Abbott directs âbad lawyersâ comment at Minnesota attorney general
After the judgeâs decision, Ellison posted online that the Texas governor had an obligation to extradite Castro. And by refusing to extradite him, âGreg Abbott is turning Texas into a sanctuary state for violent criminals.â
Abbott responded to Ellison.
âYou guys are such bad lawyers. You showed up unprepared, uninformed & unpersuasive,â Abbott wrote online. âYou donât know the law & it showed.â
The Texas governor accused Minnesota of refusing to enforce immigration laws and threatened to send immigrants in the future to their state as he did with New York City, when thousands were released into Texas under President Joe Bidenâs administration.
A message seeking reaction from Ellison was sent to his office Thursday.
Minnesota officials say Castro could flee the country, citing calls he made from jail to a woman in Mexico, talking âabout marrying her and buying a house in Mexico when he is released,â according to the lawsuit.
The judge conceded that Castro could flee the country but added that âthe threat of injury by itself does not create an issue ripe for adjudication.â
https://apnews.com/article/minnesot...adition-d1299b21657fe35afae615386d40552dSo if you shoot someone and lie to the police in a blue state, a red state will protect you. What kind of excuse is it that you can't extradite a man for shooting someone and filing a false police report because there may be fraud happening in that same state? Because you "did it for trump"? Murica!
