DawgTalkers.net Forums Active Threads

I don’t know if he talked about debunked conspiracy theories. I couldn’t last through the first sentences he spoke.

Yep. Same with robotics/robots replacing humans. At Amazon, where I work, we know the day will come, sooner or later.

Who do you think peen is talking about in the first line? Mickey Mouse

Trump will Sell Banks "Fastest Access" To His Truth Social Posts

https://www.reuters.com/technology/...-tracking-truth-social-posts-2026-07-16/

So not only did you make two faux pas with your reading comprehension. You added a 3rd (while trying to pass by on the first two swings and misses)

My comment was "Frank Said so - it must be true" ... that's not an attack on someone's character. Not unless you really try to twist things and go all snowflakery on me.

You're 0-3 today. Move along.

You can purchase a pearl necklace at any local jewelry store in America. Millions of women own one and wear them. If the first thing your child takes away from the reference of "pearl necklace" is the one you chose to mention maybe people should be more careful about who their child is communicating with. #triggered #snowflake

WTF??

You're gross dude. That crap is EXPLICITLY unacceptable on a child-friendly site.

US networks face dilemma over whether to air Trump's election security speech

NEW YORK, July 16 (Reuters) - U.S. television networks are weighing whether to carry a ​planned primetime address on Thursday by President Donald Trump, who is expected to focus his remarks on election security, ‌four months before critical midterm elections.

Networks have historically carried most such speeches on the grounds that they provide information of public importance.

The White House is considering using the speech to disclose sensitive intelligence related to China's intention or ability to interfere in the 2020 U.S. election, Reuters reported on Wednesday, which some Trump ​officials worry could be misleading.

During a Thursday press briefing, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said that “it is also very ​possible” Trump will mention the current situation with Iran and the economy at the top of the ⁠speech, and could possibly address a range of topics.

She said that is “all the more reason” for the networks to carry the speech ​live, and for Americans to tune in.

Trump has spent years sowing doubts about electoral outcomes, falsely claiming his 2020 loss to Democrat Joe Biden ​was rigged. He has also claimed without evidence that mail-in voting is rife with fraud, voting machines are vulnerable to manipulation and non-citizen voting is widespread.

Some Democrats, including U.S. Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, have urged networks not to air the speech, arguing Trump is likely to repeat debunked claims.

Spokespeople for the three major ​U.S. networks -- ABC, CBS and NBC -- did not respond to Reuters questions about whether they planned to carry the address live. CNN ​and Fox News (FOXA.O), opens new tab also did not respond to a request for comment.

Declining to air the speech would risk angering an administration that has already placed ‌unprecedented pressure ⁠on the major broadcast networks.

Walt Disney (DIS.N), opens new tab- owned ABC is facing two pending inquiries from the Federal Communications Commission, including one examining whether its daytime talk show "The View" violated equal-time rules by interviewing a Democratic Senate candidate in Texas.

Trump has repeatedly attacked NBC and its parent company, Comcast (CMCSA.O), opens new tab, which he has dubbed "Concast." Last month he stormed out of an interview with NBC political reporter Kristen Welker after calling the network "a one-sided ​crooked network."

Comcast last month announced plans to ​split into two publicly traded ⁠companies through a spinoff of NBCUniversal and Sky. Analysts have said the move could make NBCUniversal an attractive takeover target.

At CBS, the takeover of Paramount (PSKY.O), opens new tab by David Ellison, whose billionaire father Larry is a ​Trump ally, has roiled the newsroom and prompted the departure of senior staff from the news magazine "60 ​Minutes". Some employees ⁠have alleged political interference in editorial decisions, which the network has denied.

Ellison is now awaiting FCC approval for Paramount's acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery, which could give him control of CNN, a network Trump has long criticized for what he says is unfair coverage. The U.S. Justice Department's Antitrust ⁠Division gave ​its blessing to the deal last month.

The conservative-leaning cable news network Fox News, ​owned by Rupert Murdoch, generally carries all of Trump's speeches but may also be wary of this one.

In 2023, the network had to pay out $787 million to settle a defamation ​suit over its airing of false claims about the 2020 election.

https://www.reuters.com/legal/gover...mps-election-security-speech-2026-07-16/

And that's the entire point. No matter what trump has done you never comment on any of it. You never seem to care about any of it. You turn a blind eye to all of it.

Linda? I'm not the one wearing trump's pearl necklace.

Nope. Just don't care, Linda.

Aw...... I'm not the one sounding like a triggered snowflake. Your source was shown to be a very bias man with an agenda no different than what you accuse others of being.

And your response is that of a ten year old. "I don't like it so I'm not going to read it!"

The end.

In other news. Detroit has the worst air quality in the world today due to more never-ending wildfires in Canada. These lefties have an answer:




Sounds similar to Gavin blaming the California fires on climate change, just a tick or two dumber.

No offense, but I have no desire to read your long, drawn out, scarecrow posts. Didn't read that one, have no desire to debate you crybabies whining about a poll you don't like.

The end.

Anecdotal circumstance in an election 6 years after the 2020 election is not proof of anything that could be used in support of a 2020 claim.

What is whataboutism at its finest...

Actually I posted a factual background about him. You are denying what he is and now have nothing but to hurl insults to divert attention away from it. It's not my fault you failed to look into who he really is before you posted that nonsense. I'm sorry that facts are not your fiend.................

Dr. Frank Luntz is President of Frank I. Luntz & Associates, a survey research and consulting firm, whose clients include Ross Perot, Pat Buchanan, the Reform Party of Canada, the Democratic Party of Slovenia, and National Geographic. Dr. Luntz has also been active in international elections, having served as the political consultant to the Likud Party of Israel in 1988.

Slovenia's main democratic right-wing party is the Slovenian Democratic Party (Slovenska demokratska stranka, or SDS). Founded in 1989, it is a conservative and national-conservative party led by former Prime Minister Janez Janša.

Likud, officially the Likud – National Liberal Movement, is Israel's major right-wing and nationalist political party.

This is who the man is no matter your incessant denial.

I didn't make the news. I just reported it. But do go on denying it. That seems to be your go to now. Just like trump. Blame and make some weak attempt to trash people showing the truth when you don't like it.

Same as it ever was.

Well I must give you credit, you are trying to use grade school-level mathematics. Raw data with no context certainly qualifies.

Maybe it's that grade school level thinking that makes them ignore the facts and act so insulted by it............

Frank Luntz has been conducting high-profile political polling and focus groups for nearly 35 years, but now he's nothing more than a right-wing liar.

Because: Pit@DawgTalkers says so.

Anyone forced to read ^ that mess ^ would find their reading comprehension is "slipping".

You attacked his character as soon as the post appeared. Own it.

You base this as being factual according to the statements provided to you by the source itself and nothing else. You believe what you want to believe. He is not your savior nor mare reliable than other polls.




Did you want to make up some BS about what you meant by that now?

I guess my question is - is there really ANYONE on the planet that believes Trump won the 2020 election?

Everything else is posturing and trolling.

You find a lot of things odd. In this case, grade school-level mathematics.

Your reading comprehension is slipping more and more. From not understanding that "what he says" was a reference to what Trump was going to say in a thread about Trump's imminent speech - to trying to suggest that an accurate post commenting on how Polls can be and are are manipulated and making a post claiming I said the questions in this poll were slanted.

1+1 = 3 according to you.

You're talking about two different things (again) and then using that false narrative to call me a hypocrite.

I've never said polls should be trusted and I didn't say that about this one. I have said that at times they can be meaningless; and never said this one is meaningful.

I simply said the result of the polls are facts. So, unless you can show us where Frankie conducts polls and then misreports the results, you're barking up the wrong tree here.

Was this a fake poll? Is Frankie not qualified to conduct polls?

The questions in this poll were slanted? Where are they, I didn't actually see the wording, please point me in the right direction.