DawgTalkers.net Forums Active Threads

Maybe if you were my aunt and had a set, you could be my uncle too. But I can't think of any scenario where you would be my dad and tell me to post about Jan 6, or any other crazy idea you have for what I should post. Nor can I think of a scenario where you actually have a set.


Crap! Well thanks for the reminder!

Maybe it's time you stop worrying about if men can get pregnant and spend sometime explaining why Trump pardoned those that attacked the Capital on Jan 6, 2021. Or maybe why he pardoned the former Pres of Honduras but went after the Pres of Venezuela. Or maybe you can discuss the stupidity of threatening our allies and saying he'll not rule out attacking Greenland?

At least those issues have impact on Americans...

But no,, You'll probably talk about his receiving the Nobel Participation Prize!? Yeah, that one will really set the stage for a fun debate.....

Right now, in our QB room it is what it is. Maybe we can sign Malik Willis maybe not. I wouldn't count on it. Maybe we pull a rabbit out of the hat with Drew Allar or Carson Beck. Do you want to put your money on it? I don't. IMO keep trying to develop SS. Keep DW, although I'm not crazy about the idea, you're paying him anyway, and draft a QB in the 3rd or 4th round to compete with DG for 3rd string. Try and trade down for another #1 for "27 and use draft picks and FA to improve our weaknesses. I don't see much else we can do. One thing more. I believe Pit is right about you draft the QB first and then build around him but we are not in that position. Besides, WE are the Browns, and we like to do things differently and show everyone how smart we can be.

And any dumb ass knows you don't continue shooting at someone once there is no longer a threat. Some of you keep trying to make excuses for those second and third shots when there is none.

That's YOU talking. A quote from your post. Post number 2131121

And any dumb ass knows you don't continue shooting at someone once there is no longer a threat. Some of you keep trying to make excuses for those second and third shots when there is none.

That's YOU talking. A quote from your post.

Right now, I take SS over DG. Showed more, but I’m not convinced Sanders is the guy.

No problem. It's the first thing I thought of when I read those tweets. It seems like destiny. Like a match made in heaven..... I mean hell.

Epic, loved that! I laughed better than I have in weeks, thanks man

And fate makes it even funnier with that meme thing!

You need to find a quote on that. FATE said he was certain the first shot was the kill shot, not me. I said it may have been but we don't know.

And how does that change anything? I do understand the first shot. I've said that all along. Whether or not the first shot killed her or not doesn't change the circumstances of shots two and three. When an officer, or anyone of us for that matter, fires a weapon at someone we are responsible that we shot that weapon in a responsible manner and at the time that weapon was fired we had a reasonable fear for our life. That's whether that person with the shot or not.

Once again, reporting the doctors findings is not an argument.



That's just a flat out lie that you are making up out of thin air.

It appears you can't comprehend that clarifying his injuries were not serious helps clear up some of the accusations being launched by both sides of this discussion. And my saying he was injured I'm agreeing with you that he did in fact go to the hospital. Agreeing with you isn't staring an argument.

Yes at some point he was sent to the hospital. There is a video showing him walking away from the shooting scene immediately after the incident. Nothing appeared abnormal. That once again is not an argument. It's a point of fact.

The only thing it seems you are all worked up about is that I brought into question the extent of his injuries. This after Noem trying to dramatize and put his injuries in the worst possible light. After trump claiming she "ran over him". None of which you even offered to comment on.

Now suddenly, even after me agreeing with some your points you act like a child about it. That explains exactly how your brain works.

Now shut up.

Opposite, ship Sanders, keep Gabriel- you lose all the drama with Sanders. Wonder if anyone wants either.

Earlier in this thread, you said the first shot was the "kill" shot.

Later in this thread you said "I understand the first shot".

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney just announced that he is demanding the immediate turnover of Alaska to Canada for national security reasons.

Look dude, I have no idea how your brain works but I know it's just wired to create arguments from thin air.

One poster inferred he wasn't really injured because he never even went to the hospital. I simply stated there was nothing about that in the article... because there wasn't. Don't know if he just likes making ish up or what -- don't care.


Your response was that Noem sent him home.


I have no flipping idea what that has to do with the conversation. I've tried to explain that. At this point you must be taking pleasure in wasting my time.

I'm not here to argue the severity of his injuries or what a flipping bruise is. On a scale of 1-10 I care about -4. I never said his injuries were severe, never even hinted at it. I simply stated to a poster -- one that posted what is most likely a lie -- that their article is b.s.

You've tried to move the argument in three different directions since then.

If this were a blind date, I'd already be suing you for harassment. Nothing you have said has made any sense, yet you're still blabbering nonsense.

Shut. Up.

So, your final answer is he was never taken to the hospital??

Yes and something as slight as bruising is described as internal bleeding. I didn't turn this into "an argument as to whether or not he should have been hospitalized". Doctors already determined that. I reported that doctors didn't find the injury as something serious enough to hospitalize him. That isn't starting an argument. That's telling you what the doctors determined. Claiming otherwise is your Strawman.

I do however understand how pointing out his injury wasn't serious would be so upsetting to you and that somehow you find it offensive I pointed it out.

The description being used could be as simple as bruising. That would make sense since he was looked at and released.

Bruising is a form of internal bleeding where small blood vessels break under the skin, leaking blood into surrounding tissues................

The more you read the more you know.

https://www.nytimes.com/live/2026/01/15/us/minneapolis-shooting-ice

So if they hire Tomlin they should keep watson?

Of Tua as a band aid or a permanent solution?

As a band aid I think he is good enough with a better OL and an actual #1 WR to increase the win total but not good enough to be any type of long term solution. But then again any QB ends up with better results when he has a better running game and pass protection by a good OL and better WR's. I'm not sure however if you find that very helpful.

I think the real question is what will the actual results of a better record be? I mean I'm sure everyone would feel better if we won 7-9 games instead of 3-5 games. That's a given.

But if we're looking to draft a future franchise QB in the following draft it puts you that much further away and far more costly to do so.

So it may be a case of the old saying "biting off your nose to spite your own face" in the end by actually improving the QB position next season.

interesting rumor

Well,8-26 over 2 years doesnot scream out the need to keep the status quo.

I SAID THIS:


YOU RESPONDED WITH THIS:



YOU turned this into an argument as to whether or not he should have been hospitalized.

That's called a Strawman.

The FACT is: You can both have internal bleeding and not be hospitalized.

That is why this is just another in a long line of arguments that make no sense.

Not sure what our FA budget is going to end up being this year... my understanding is that the have to dumpster dive for another off-season before our cap goes back to normal. I think we're in for another TC of long-shot FA QBs being given an outside shot of latching on.

What are folks' opinion of Tua? I don't watch any Dolphins games... he was good and then he wasn't. I believe their Oline regressed substantially(?).

Dear God. Now lets prepare to watch people try to put lipstick on this pig.