I am tired of people supporting criminals.
So you think supporting he be put to death but not have it live streamed is "supporting criminals? On what planet would that be true?

I would have no problem making executions public. Criminals have no rights. They gave up their rights when they became criminals.
So when did that mean somehow we have the right to do the wrong thing? When did them being barbarians make us being barbarians acceptable?
I have no desire to watch but I do have a desire for there to be more deterrents for crime.
The death penalty has shown not to be a deterrent to murder.................
• Scientific Consensus: Over 88% of leading criminologists surveyed in studies published in the Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology state that the death penalty does not lower murder rates.
• National Research Council Reports: A 2012 report by the National Research Council concluded that decades of research provide no credible evidence that capital punishment decreases, increases, or has any effect on homicide rates.
• State Comparisons: FBI data shows that murder rates have consistently been higher in states with the death penalty than in states without it.• Certainty vs. Severity: Criminological studies indicate that the certainty of being caught and arrested is a far stronger deterrent to crime than the severity of the punishment.
We need quicker punishments. Allowing someone 20+ years on death row is ridiculous. If they are found guilty and appeal and lose then free up the good air.
So ignore the law and ignore the appeals process?
Also, lawyers making winning and losing cases a sport. Justice is about finding the truth. If a lawyer knows their client is guilty and gets that person off or a judge is soft on crime and lets a criminal out and that criminal commits another crime, then that judge and lawyer should be held accountable. It is time this country gets hard on crime.
Lawyers are bound to provide zealous, competent, and quality representation under ethical rules.
The Sixth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution guarantees criminal defendants the right to the assistance of counsel, and the government must provide a public defender if the defendant cannot afford one.
You don't have to like it. You don't have to agree with it. I can't say I disagree with how you "feel" is some regards. But you are proposing that attorney's ignore their code of ethics they take to be and continue to be a lawyer in the first place.
This is what happens when you let your feelings rather than a guaranteed right of defendants control your emotions.
Once again, nobody in this entire thread has been against this man getting the death penalty.
But if your goal is to make a martyr out of him, which he has requested and show Muslim extremists America putting a man in a wheelchair getting executed by the firing squad this is the perfect way of doing it. You support handing them the most perfect recruiting tool anyone could think of.
Sometimes thinking long term and looking at the totality of the consequences your choices produce is a better option than looking at it strictly from the short term gratification, emotional aspect that somehow makes you feel good.