Wayne County Executive Robert Ficano's office recently announced changes to the county's executive retirement plan, but the tweaks don't go as far as he first announced.
More than 18 months ago, Ficano said he wanted to cut down a lavish county perk that paid him and his appointees $5 for every $1 they put towards their 401k. When the perk became a news story, Ficano said he'd act quickly to end it, changing the 5-to-1 match to a 1-to-1 match.
Instead, Ficano failed to make any changes. When 7 Action News asked him why in April, he said it was a tougher task than he thought.
"When I looked at it, I thought it would be the only thing we needed to change," Ficano said.
"I realized that the county had its most difficulty with the pensions, so we wanted to change it all at the same time."
Less than a month after our story aired, Ficano finally acted. But he didn't do what he said he'd do. Instead of trimming the perk down to a 1-to-1 match, he changed it to a 4-to-1 match. It affects all new employees or those who've worked for Wayne County for less than 20 years. But if you've worked more than that, like Ficano, you can still keep the 5-to-1. This plan, he said today, makes the most sense. Contributions are capped at 10% of an appointee's salary.
"We researched the rules and we looked at what are the best practices that are supposed to be accepted by the State of Michigan," Ficano said.
"The governor's office published it-- came out with these particular regulations, so we're meeting those."
Ficano also reduced how much employees who receive a pension will get going forward. Instead of getting 2.5% of your salary for every year of service, employees will only get 1.5% going forward. Former County Auditor General Brendan Dunleavy said today that Ficano's changes are too little, too late.
"The problem is so big and what you did is so small to fix it. It's not going to make any difference," Dunleavy said.
He says Ficano's fixes won't go far enough in digging the county's pension fund out from a huge hole made worse, in part, by giving retirement deals to young appointees like Matt Schenk. As we first exposed last month, Schenk is only 41, spent 9 years at Wayne County and is set to collect a $96,000 a year pension for the rest of his life.
"Nobody did their job, and that's why you're here today," Dunleavy said.
"These are folks who should've been banging their shoe on their table saying: 'You can't implement this.' It will send the pension plan into bankruptcy or into financial stress. But instead they were saying, 'Me too.' "
Contact Investigator Ross Jones at rjones@wxyz.com or at (248) 827-9466.
Copyright 2013 Scripps Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
And into the forest I go, to lose my mind and find my soul. - John Muir
Wow, what a sweet deal. Allocate 10% of your pay to 401k and the taxpayers will match 50% of your pay, so you are actually putting in 60% of your pay into your 401k.
I bet none of this stuff would happen if raises, health plans and retirement plans all had to be approved by the voters.
Quote: He says Ficano's fixes won't go far enough in digging the county's pension fund out from a huge hole made worse, in part, by giving retirement deals to young appointees like Matt Schenk. As we first exposed last month, Schenk is only 41, spent 9 years at Wayne County and is set to collect a $96,000 a year pension for the rest of his life.
Geesh.. What a sweet deal.. makes me wanna work for the city of Detroit or the county or whatever.. For that kinda retirement,, wow. 5 x what you contribute plus interest over 10 or 20 years,, man, that can be some serious money ...
#GMSTRONG
“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.” Daniel Patrick Moynahan
"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe." Damanshot
He says Ficano's fixes won't go far enough in digging the county's pension fund out from a huge hole made worse, in part, by giving retirement deals to young appointees like Matt Schenk. As we first exposed last month, Schenk is only 41, spent 9 years at Wayne County and is set to collect a $96,000 a year pension for the rest of his life.
Personally, I think we need to focus on changing the Redskins name. That's the bigger issue here.
It's bribery to keep all government employees voting for the status quo.... because in Detroit that has been working so well.
Agreed. Sadly, I don't think it's just detroit that does this. States do it, our federal gov't. does it.
Help me out - when is the last time a tax was reduced or eliminated because a gov't. agency said "hey, we have enough money."?
Then ask yourself "when was the last time a city, county, school district, state, or federal gov't. said "we need more tax money. What we do with it isn't your business - just pay it."?
Quote: Help me out - when is the last time a tax was reduced or eliminated because a gov't. agency said "hey, we have enough money."?
Let's see, there was that time in... ok, never.
It's because government approaches taxes from the "how much can we get" standpoint first then they look at the "ok, now what can we spend it on" approach.. when the approach should be, in order...
1. What is the fundamental roll of this level of government? 2. What is the minimum/reasonable amount we need to support that? 3. And lastly, how should we divide up who pays it?
But they start with how much can we get first and work backwards from there.
Quote: Wow, what a sweet deal. Allocate 10% of your pay to 401k and the taxpayers will match 50% of your pay, so you are actually putting in 60% of your pay into your 401k.
I bet none of this stuff would happen if raises, health plans and retirement plans all had to be approved by the voters.
I took the 10% cap as the max the county would put in. That's how ours was where I work, I could put in as much as I wanted, and the company matched me 1 for 1 up to 10% of my annual salary. So If I made 50k they put in no more then 5k.
We don't have to agree with each other, to respect each others opinion.
Quote: Personally, I think we need to focus on changing the Redskins name. That's the bigger issue here.
Heck with the Redskins we need to change the Lions name. It's insulting to Lions all over the world. I mean come on do Lions really look like the picture on Detroit's helmets.
Quote: Personally, I think we need to focus on changing the Redskins name. That's the bigger issue here.
Heck with the Redskins we need to change the Lions name. It's insulting to Lions all over the world. I mean come on do Lions really look like the picture on Detroit's helmets.
What, you've never seen a blue lion before?
We don't have to agree with each other, to respect each others opinion.