|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065 Likes: 1
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,065 Likes: 1 |
Quote:
ask the Ravens how Anquan Boldin is panning out. I have yet to see the Browns be able to draft and develop a WR since 99 thats worth a damn.
They traded for Boldin.
Am I the only one that pronounces hyperbole "Hyper-bowl" instead of "hy-per-bo-le"?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,350 Likes: 448
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 50,350 Likes: 448 |
Quote:
Quote:
ask the Ravens how Anquan Boldin is panning out. I have yet to see the Browns be able to draft and develop a WR since 99 thats worth a damn.
They traded for Boldin.
And I really wanted him in Cleveland when they did. I could not believe that we didn't make a move for him.
Micah 6:8; He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God.
John 14:19 Jesus said: Because I live, you also will live.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,850
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,850 |
Quote:
I have yet to see the Browns be able to draft and develop a WR since 99 thats worth a damn.
i hope you are not including Kevin Johnson and are just saying "since Kevin Johnson" with that statement. that dude had ridiculous hands.
since then, hard to argue. Braylon had 1 season. Benjamin has looked pretty good so far (surprisingly).
#gmstrong
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,456
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,456 |
J/C
Thinking about this bring in a Vet WR we did try btw the both went to washington and one said he wouldnt play here IIRC. But lets say we did then who would you cut? If your bringing in a vet to help along little Gordon Benji norwood then who goes your not going to cut Cribbs or Mo Mass. I would guess Norwood would probably be the odd man out get picked up by some other team and people would be pointing to him as a player we had and let go.
My best guess is we wouldnt have tried to get Gordon and that book is a long way from being opened. In the end we maybe better because we didnt get a vet FA. Almost like a chicken and egg thing.
If you need 3 years to be a winner you got here 2 years to early. Get it done Browns.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 65
Rookie
|
Rookie
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 65 |
4 games from a young offense and we should blow it up? I will wait to pass judgement until the middle to end of the season as to if this is not working. I have seen improvement over the last year in 4 games but to say that it isn't, is to have an agenda. Youth = struggles in the NFL. Like others have said so many rooks at so many spots means mistakes but also growth that can be something. This team is headed into the right direction as some spots look to be held down by good to possible probowl players coming with the same system in place to let them grow. It will get blown up and it will start over again cause I believe that the new owner is going to do it anyways and that is what I am not looking forward to. Hope he doesn't, cause I am tired of hearing we don't have the players so give it 4 to 5 years.
|
|
|
DawgTalkers.net
Forums DawgTalk Pure Football Forum Browns offense through 3 games
2011 to 2012