|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 309
All Pro
|
OP
All Pro
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 309 |
I was offered Tom Brady and (James Jones or Antonio Brown) for Roethlisberger and Greg Jennings. Brady is always tempting to me but I don't want to make the wrong move because I am 5-2 currently already.
My RB's are McCoy, Turner, Bernard Scott, and Montario Hardesty.
My WR's (without Jennings) would be Vincent Jackson (underperforming), Branch, Victor Cruz, Jordy Nelson, Santonio Holmes, and would have either James Jones or Antonio Brown.
Would you make this move and lose your sure #1 WR or hope Roethlisberger can help win the championship?
Or do you make the move and get Brady. And count on Brady, Strong #1 and #2 RB's w/ a weaker WR core?
Any thoughts would be appreciated.
Last edited by South Florida Dawg; 10/29/11 08:31 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,577 Likes: 8
Dawg Talker
|
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,577 Likes: 8 |
I wouldn't do it - keep the team you have.
"If it weren't for my horse, I wouldn't have spent that year in college"
GO ROCKETS
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413 Likes: 501
Legend
|
|
Legend
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413 Likes: 501 |
While Brady is better than Roethlisbeger the difference between Jennings and the WR's you would receive don't make up the difference.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 15,979 Likes: 83
Legend
|
|
Legend
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 15,979 Likes: 83 |
You have Rothlisburger and Santonio holmes a #1 set while if you get Brady and Branch, you wouldn't even have ( Brady and Welker) their #1 set.
Sounds to me like the add ons are just there to confuse you. It's not worth the trade, because it sounds like they just want to split up Rothlisberger and Holmes which is a real threat to score in head to head competition.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,577 Likes: 8
Dawg Talker
|
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,577 Likes: 8 |
"If it weren't for my horse, I wouldn't have spent that year in college"
GO ROCKETS
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,338
Dawg Talker
|
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,338 |
No way I would do it! It is essentially Tom Brady for two starters.
"Going from 4-12 to 6-10 isn't good enough. I believe we are going to be better than that. We're going to be a lot better than that." - Mike Holmgren (3/15/12)
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,365 Likes: 48
Hall of Famer
|
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,365 Likes: 48 |
Quote:
You have Rothlisburger and Santonio holmes a #1 set while if you get Brady and Branch, you wouldn't even have ( Brady and Welker) their #1 set.
Sounds to me like the add ons are just there to confuse you. It's not worth the trade, because it sounds like they just want to split up Rothlisberger and Holmes which is a real threat to score in head to head competition.
LMAO
You do realize Santonio Holmes hasn't been a Steeler since 2009?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413 Likes: 501
Legend
|
|
Legend
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413 Likes: 501 |
I think he should pick up Troy Aikman and Michael Irvin.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,577 Likes: 8
Dawg Talker
|
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,577 Likes: 8 |
Quote:
Quote:
You have Rothlisburger and Santonio holmes a #1 set while if you get Brady and Branch, you wouldn't even have ( Brady and Welker) their #1 set.
Sounds to me like the add ons are just there to confuse you. It's not worth the trade, because it sounds like they just want to split up Rothlisberger and Holmes which is a real threat to score in head to head competition.
LMAO
You do realize Santonio Holmes hasn't been a Steeler since 2009?
Or that it's fantasy football - it's not like these guys are really being seperated. lol
"If it weren't for my horse, I wouldn't have spent that year in college"
GO ROCKETS
|
|
|
DawgTalkers.net
Forums DawgTalk Fantasy & Gaming Trade Offer
|
|
|
|
