Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,015
O
Hall of Famer
OP Offline
Hall of Famer
O
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,015
Having spent the last 20 minutes trying to find out anything I can about this guy, all I've been able to learn is that the Saints signed him as an undrafted free agent in 2008. He was a two-sport guy at Stanford, playing basketball as well.

He should, the kid is listed at 6'7

He was a wideout whose listed weight was 237 in college. He had a dislocated hip and got a medical redshirt.

He then "bulked up" to 247 and ended up with the Saints, who promptly released him.

He signed with the Packers and went through offseason workouts and part of camp before having a serious knee injury. He was released from IR with an injury settlement.

All I can find is that he was promoted, and since getting here, he's been beyond awesome considering he came out of nowhere.

The catch against the Steelers was Winslow-esque, as he reached behind him with one hand and pulled the pass in.

Obviously, at that height, he isn't going to be a good blocker. In fact, even though he's listed in the 245-range, he's not going to be a very good blocker. However, he sure as Hell looks like a Joe Jurevicius type.

The big worry is going to be injuries.

People have said Quinn would be better served to have a TE. I'd agree. Moore could be that guy..........

Found a report, though the report isn't exactly Mel Kiper.

Quote:

Diamond in the rough?
Evan Moore
Evan Moore

By Tyler Dunne
tydunne07@yahoo.com
Posted Jun 22, 2008


| More

Free agent tight end Evan Moore improving his odds of making final roster, says Packer Report's Tyler Dunne

Evan Moore doesn’t know what all of the fuss is about.

The undrafted tight end runs his routes crisply with a knee-high stride. He makes hard cuts, flashes his hands immediately and catches the ball away from his body.

As a starting wide receiver in college such fluidness was expected. As an undrafted tight end in the pros it has players and coaches buzzing.

Through last week’s minicamp there were plenty of double-takes fired in Moore’s direction.

"No one really has any expectations, so anything you do is a big plus," Moore said. "I haven’t experienced that since my freshman year in college. Here you make a play and people say, ‘Hey man that’s an unbelievable play,’ and I say, ‘That’s what I always do.’ It’s kind of nice to be the underdog."

In late April, Moore, a Stanford grad, expected to be drafted ... as a wide receiver. Neither happened. Teams were scared off by Moore’s injury history, which included a season-ending dislocated hip and a stress fracture in his foot.

But he’s fully healthy now. Moore said he doesn’t even know where the Packers’ training camp is located. And he’s in a great situation to make a realistic run at a roster spot. Six tight ends are on the Packers’ roster. Other than starter Donald Lee, nobody in the lot possesses better pure receiving skills than the towering 6-foot-6, 240-pound Moore, who also played two years of basketball at Stanford.

Still, it’s been a "big adjustment," Moore admitted. Instead of reading cornerbacks and safeties, Moore is pinpointing linemen and linebackers at the line and blocking behemoths with 50 pounds on him is a major hurdle he’ll cross five weeks from now.

But while Moore is learning a completely new position on-the-fly, basic pass-catching skills are engrained in him. And he expects nothing less.

While his chief competition for the No. 3 tight end job, Tory Humphrey, dropped several intermediate passes during minicamp, Moore was a vacuum. On one play last Wednesday, quarterback Matt Flynn looked left, turned right and hit Evan Moore slicing down the seam for a big gain. Moore caught an identical pass from Brian Brohm the previous day in practice.

"I like to think that’s just a play that I make," Moore said. "They haven't seen that here yet, so they were hyped about it. I’ll relish that role."

Moore started at wideout from the get-go at Stanford. While playing for dismal teams, he was often Trent Edwards’ favorite target. In fact, Moore and the Buffalo Bills’ starting quarterback are "like brothers."

In his ’04 sophomore year with the Cardinal, Moore caught 39 passes for 616 yards and six touchdowns. A hip injury sidelined Moore for all but one game in ’05. He was rendered to a part-time role in ’06 after suffering a stress fracture in his right foot and caught just 14 passes in eight games. But as a senior, Moore returned to form with 39 catches for 481 yards and one TD.

Injuries aren’t an issue anymore and Moore has already caught the eye of Green Bay’s new starting quarterback.

"He’s made some nice plays for us," Aaron Rodgers said. "He’s in a tough spot. He’s got some guys in front of him with a lot of talent, but he just needs to keep making plays and he’ll be where he needs to be."

Rodgers said Moore reminds him of Garrett Cross, who he threw passes to at junior college, the University of California and briefly in minicamps of his rookie season with the Packers.

"(Evan) is a tight end with the same body type that can run and catch like Garrett," Rodgers said. "He’s done a nice job picking it up mentally, and physically he’s got all the tools. His biggest transition – and I’ve seen guys who’ve made position changes like this – is going to be blocking. It’s going to be taking on 270-pound defensive ends who have good leverage."

So there was Moore waiting in line during a simple blocking drill at Tuesday’s practice. The tight ends needed to explode out of their stance and attack the outside "shoulder" of a pad. As the other tight ends waited idly, Moore went through the motions of the drill, simulating his first step out of the stance. Again and again.

Fundamental tight end nuances, such as a three-point stance are foreign to him. The OTAs and minicamp helped, but Moore isn’t an overnight miracle. The potential needs polishing.

"It’s only been three-and-a-half weeks," Moore said. "And while I do have high expectations for myself, I’m not going to be unrealistic and think I can pick this up in a month. It’s going to take a little bit of time to get comfortable doing this kind of stuff."

General manager Ted Thompson constantly preaches that the "best football players" make the team. Number-crunching at each position is rare. Hence, in 2006, four tight ends earned roster spots. Last season? Two. Now with a wide-open field behind Lee, Moore is playing with a "nothing to lose" attitude – a sensation he said he hasn’t felt since his freshman year in college.

Equal opportunity advancement sure is an effective stress-reliever.

Evan Moore
Evan Moore made 39 catches for 481 yards and one
TD as a senior last year at Stanford.

"You try to only focus at what is at hand and that is continuing to learn. But in the back of your mind, yeah, you want to be here all year long,” he said. "So hearing that it’s not all about numbers and that it’s about the players is encouraging. But the only way you’re going to reach that goal is by taking it one day at a time."

When Moore first arrived in Green Bay at the end of the first week of OTAs, he walked into a buzzsaw. Moore didn’t even know what a defensive front was, and he was the last of the six tight ends to join. But now Moore says he’s comfortable with any play or package thrown at him – the product of a "good memory" and that glossy Stanford degree ("That helps a bit," Moore laughed).

The bulk and strength needed at the tight end position is an automatic setback for Moore. He’s 13 pounds less than Humphrey, eight less than third-round pick Jermichael Finley, 27 less than Joey Haynos and 18 less than Mike Peterson.

But as Moore caught an array of passes from Matt Flynn, the same guy he trained with in Florida for two months in preparation for the Combine, it’s obvious that his ticket to the NFL is making plays downfield.

Something as natural as snatching the ball out the air, rather than swallowing it into his stomach.

"That’s something I always take pride in," Moore said. "For some reason that’s something that catches peoples’ eyes."




You can bet those eyes will widen when the pads are strapped on in five weeks.

Last edited by OverToad; 12/11/09 04:54 AM.

***Gordon, I really didn't think you could be this stOOpid, but you exceeded my expectations. Wussy.
Manziel, see Josh Gordon. Dumbass.***
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,744
L
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
L
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,744
So it seems he was talented but was unpolished. I guess the Packers didn't feel they wanted to put the time/resources into him to polish him.

It seems Quinn (well in fact most young QBs) needs a safety blanket and a TE is a natural safety blanket for QBs. It has been nice to see a TE who can catch. Quinn missed him twice two which means he has the talent to get open too.


Go Browns!!

[Linked Image]
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,867
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,867
I enjoy watching a young guy come along like he is... Nice catch.. Reaching back like he did was pretty damn amazing... he made it look easy.

don't know what the future holds for this young man, but damn, sure nice to see him in a Browns uni....


#GMSTRONG

“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.”
Daniel Patrick Moynahan

"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe."
Damanshot
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,887
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,887
Hope we have him signed for next year. I want to see "Moore" of him!!!!


[Linked Image from mypsn.eu.playstation.com]
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,551
Hall of Famer
Online
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,551
This Moore kid made me forget all about Robert Royal, then royal drops an easy first down pass on 3rd to kill a drive and I remembered him.

I really like what I have seen from Moore the guy reminds me of Ozzie in how he attacks the football. Great hands. Hopefully the injury bug is out of his system cause man, you get this kid running that middle post and he is gonna be virtually impossible to stop due to his size. Just wait till he gets his timing down with a QB.

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,086
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,086
He looks like a solid pickup. Hopefully he can work into a K2 type role for us. We need a TE that is a legit offensive weapon so teams have to respect that.


[Linked Image from i45.tinypic.com]
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,632
1
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
1
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,632
It's hard to keep a TE around in the AFC North that isn't a decent blocker. Obviously the exception was made for Winslow. If he continues being the hoover he's been an exception can be made for him as well. Certainly his height makes him a very attractice mismatch and target for our QB.... who desperately needs a TE. I just LOVE that we're finding some diamonds at the end of this year. If Benard, Jennings, Rubin, Roth, & Massaquai keep their trajectory these last few games perhaps this offseason might be a little simpler.




"Team Chemistry No Match for Team Biology" (Onion Sports Headline)
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,867
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,867
Quote:

This Moore kid made me forget all about Robert Royal, then royal drops an easy first down pass on 3rd to kill a drive and I remembered him.





Yeah,, I want to see more of Moore, Mour..... See what I did there

In all fairness to Royal, have you ever seen his hands,, his fingers are all knarled up.. it's no wonder he can't catch.. Then add in the weather last night and geez.. so that begs the question, why throw to him.. Let him do what he was brought in to do, Block....


#GMSTRONG

“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.”
Daniel Patrick Moynahan

"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe."
Damanshot
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,577
B
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
B
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,577
Quote:

don't know what the future holds for this young man, but damn, sure nice to see him in a Browns uni




Completely agree. He may pan out, he may not - but he's clearly our best option at the position at this point... and I think at any point this season... and I'm glad he's here. Hope he can continue


"If it weren't for my horse, I wouldn't have spent that year in college"
GO ROCKETS
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,753
C
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
C
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,753

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
C
Legend
Offline
Legend
C
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 42,413
Well we know that if he went to Stanford he has to be smart and a hard worker. So he probably knows the offense really well.

Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 38
R
Rookie
Offline
Rookie
R
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 38
Ok, so let's say Evan Moore plays the final three games and continues to be amazing... Isn't he, like, 4th on the TE depth chart? I assume he is behind Royal, Heiden, and Gaines?

If, next season, Royal is 100% healthy (or Heiden)- and Mangini is still here, do you think it's possible that Moore will sit while Royal continues to drop passes? Unfortunately, I think that is a *very* real possibility. I have long since formed the opinion that EM is more inclined to play guys who he likes personally, or who he feels buys into/respects him, despite his constant assurance that he is playing the guys who give us the best chance to win.

God, please have some common sense, EM, and continue to play the TE who is *making a difference* for us. Starter or not, Royal is a pass dropping douche who does not help our situation.

If Lewis, in all his "fall on the backs of the O line for 2 yards" glory was still healthy, we would not have seen (as much of) Jennings or as much of Cribbs's rushing. EM should really take the hint that sometimes loyalty to the guy he *thinks* should be the starter, or that he named the starter, is not in the best interest of the team.

How could *anyone*, watching Moore or Jennings want Royal or Lewis back in? Not to sound premature- this is all on the supposition that Moore and Jennings will continue to play well through the last 3 games.

It will also be interesting to see what happens with J. Davis next year in regard to Jennings and Harrison. That is, assuming they're all even still here, etc.

Evan Moore needs to be the starter. Royal royally sucks, Heiden is good and clutch, but he is often injured and he's what- 33 now?

I hope this kid stays for a long time and doesn't get sent back to the bench or PS when Royal and/or Heiden are back.

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,850
N
Legend
Offline
Legend
N
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,850
Royal can run block better than Moore.
Moore can catch better than Royal.

Obvious run downs, Royal is in...obvious pass downs, Moore is in (regardless of if we run or pass on those downs). The question is what do you do on the other downs?


#gmstrong
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 587
M
All Pro
Offline
All Pro
M
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 587
Does he remind anyone of a Dave Casper type? I know it's way too early to compare him to a such a great player but they look similiar in the brief time that we have seen him.


[Linked Image from netanimations.net]
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 28,171
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 28,171
Why would you say that he can't be a good blocker because he is 6' 7"?

That's like saying that Joe Thomas can't be a good blocker because he is 6' 6". That's just silly.

I suppose that you'll retort with something about leverage and being able to get low, but again, I defer you to Joe Thomas... and most any other tackle playing the game. He is a TE... he will spend lots of time in a 3-pt stance, where his height isn't going to hurt him at all.... the only possible argument would be for when he is in a 2-pt and going against a DE that is coming low.... and a player's height isn't going to matter much at all in that situation.


Browns is the Browns

... there goes Joe Thomas, the best there ever was in this game.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,015
O
Hall of Famer
OP Offline
Hall of Famer
O
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,015
Quote:

I suppose that you'll retort with something about leverage and being able to get low, but again, I defer you to Joe Thomas...




Since you said it for me, I don't have to.

I'd also note that using a left tackle as an example of why a tall guy can block is blanket statement not applicable to Moore. By that logic, we could go ahead and move Moore out to left tackle and expect him to make it.

Quote:

He is a TE...




He's no more a TE than Kellen Winslow is a TE.

Moore is a receiver. He was a 237 pound receiver in college. He's gained 10 pounds. That's nothing on a 6'7 guy.

So while he's transitioning to the TE position, he remains a guy who has a receivers body.

I seriously doubt he has any chance of being a viable blocker. That doesn't mean he can't have a role on this team of the same ilk as Winslow, who also was just a receiver playing TE.



***Gordon, I really didn't think you could be this stOOpid, but you exceeded my expectations. Wussy.
Manziel, see Josh Gordon. Dumbass.***
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 28,171
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 28,171
Quote:

I'd also note that using a left tackle as an example of why a tall guy can block is blanket statement not applicable to Moore.





It's no worse of a statement that stating that he isn't going to be a good blocker simply because you looked at his height.


Quote:

By that logic, we could go ahead and move Moore out to left tackle and expect him to make it.




No, that's a gross misinterpretation of what I stated and not at all applicable to what I was saying. I'm not the one trying to state that height dictates blocking ability, YOU are.


Quote:

He's no more a TE than Kellen Winslow is a TE.




He is that when he proves that, not when someone looks at a body statistic.


Quote:

He was a 237 pound receiver in college. He's gained 10 pounds. That's nothing on a 6'7 guy.




250lbs blocking is still 250lbs blocking: Mass is Mass. Ratio to height is irrelevant; he either knows how to use his body or he doesn't.



Quote:

I seriously doubt he has any chance of being a viable blocker.



That's fine, so say that... but don't say that he isn't or can't be because of some arbitrary measurement. It is the INDIVIDUAL that matters, not some silly number.


Browns is the Browns

... there goes Joe Thomas, the best there ever was in this game.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,015
O
Hall of Famer
OP Offline
Hall of Famer
O
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,015
Quote:


It's no worse of a statement that stating that he isn't going to be a good blocker simply because you looked at his height.




That isn't exactly accurate. Here's what I actually said.
Quote:

Obviously, at that height, he isn't going to be a good blocker. In fact, even though he's listed in the 245-range, he's not going to be a very good blocker.



I suggested that at 245 AND at that height he wouldn't be a good blocker.

Now I can understand the reaction because I didn't include that he has been a receiver his entire life, and thus blocking isn't exactly in his blood.

Quote:

No, that's a gross misinterpretation of what I stated and not at all applicable to what I was saying. I'm not the one trying to state that height dictates blocking ability, YOU are.





Since I was actually talking about overall body-type, the two aren't applicable because clearly Moore isn't built anything like a left tackle.

Quote:

250lbs blocking is still 250lbs blocking: Mass is Mass. Ratio to height is irrelevant; he either knows how to use his body or he doesn't.




I couldn't disagree more.


***Gordon, I really didn't think you could be this stOOpid, but you exceeded my expectations. Wussy.
Manziel, see Josh Gordon. Dumbass.***
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 28,171
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 28,171
Quote:

That isn't exactly accurate. Here's what I actually said.



That is entirely accurate, your first sentence stands on its own, the second sentence merely extends what you claim in the first. So, you either mis-communicated your intent extremely poorly, or you are trying to backtrack

Quote:

Now I can understand the reaction because I didn't include that he has been a receiver his entire life, and thus blocking isn't exactly in his blood.



I don't take this into account at all. Blocking is a skill and is taught, it is not something inherent. How well he learns it is merely a matter of willingness.


Quote:

I couldn't disagree more.



We'll just have to agree to completely disagree, then.

Tony Gonzalez: Height: 6 ft 5 in (1.96 m) Weight: 251 lb (114 kg)
Jeremy Shockey: Height: 6-5; Weight: 251
Heath Miller: Height: 6-5, Weight: 256
Todd Heap: Height: 6-5, Weight: 245
Kevin Boss: Height: 6-6, Weight: 253


All pass catch, all block.


Browns is the Browns

... there goes Joe Thomas, the best there ever was in this game.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 716
All Pro
Offline
All Pro
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 716
I loved the kid coming out...Had him in my mock for 2 years...when I thought he might come out as a JR.

Glad to see him doing well .....I had him and Greg Estandia in all my mocks.....guess Cleveland and I have the same taste in TE's.

HACK


[Linked Image]
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 218
G
2nd String
Offline
2nd String
G
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 218
Quote:

Benard, Jennings, Rubin, Roth, & Massaquai keep their trajectory these last few games perhaps this offseason might be a little simpler.




Now, who is responsible for bringing in these guys? I'd dare to say Mangini, the very same guy you all hate.

Mangini has proved he deserves more time.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,517
B
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,517
"guess Cleveland and I have the same taste in TE's."

To be more precise,it would be you and Mangini.
Perhaps the two of you share some sort of cosmic wavelength.If that's the case,would you please explain some of his roster moves to us?


Indecision may,or maynot,be my problem
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,728
H
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
H
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,728
That was one hell of a catch last night. And that wasn't lucky either.

I played water polo and I always wondered if it would help receivers to try a little water polo to help their hands. One of the keys to playing it effectively is learning how to absorb the ball when catching it.

When I saw Moore catch that pass I thought, I bet that guy played water polo and it looks like he knows how to absorb a football. Coming from Stanford I bet he has.


[Linked Image]
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 16,195
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 16,195
Quote:

Quote:

Benard, Jennings, Rubin, Roth, & Massaquai keep their trajectory these last few games perhaps this offseason might be a little simpler.




Now, who is responsible for bringing in these guys? I'd dare to say Mangini, the very same guy you all hate.

Mangini has proved he deserves more time.




As they say, "Even a blind squirrel finds a nut now and then".


#GMSTRONG
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,563
B
Legend
Offline
Legend
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,563
Quote:

I seriously doubt he has any chance of being a viable blocker.







Toad, you are my buddy, but I don't care.

You can't always have everything.

If blocking is what you want , just put your third tackle or guard out there.


If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.

GM Strong




[Linked Image]
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 218
G
2nd String
Offline
2nd String
G
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 218
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Benard, Jennings, Rubin, Roth, & Massaquai keep their trajectory these last few games perhaps this offseason might be a little simpler.




Now, who is responsible for bringing in these guys? I'd dare to say Mangini, the very same guy you all hate.

Mangini has proved he deserves more time.




As they say, "Even a blind squirrel finds a nut now and then".




5 Players is not a nut every now and then. If it was one or two, you'd have an argument, but not 5 Players that are listed.

Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 42
L
Practice Squad
Offline
Practice Squad
L
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 42
Of course mr Moore is a liabilty as a blocker as a converted wide reciever who hasn't filled out yet... But I wouldn't say his height has so much to do with it.

I wouldn't say that height is a detriment, I'd propose that height can help a blocker if he's proportioned. This a because leg length can make a big difference at the point of attack. Why? Well, quite simply because when your legs are bent only slightly, or bent too far, your legs are simply not as strong as when they're at a right angle.

What does this have to do with leg length? Longer legs increase the linear range at which you can maintain 'optimal' knee bend. To see how this is important, let's imagine up an example!

Let's say you've got a 6' guy against a 6'6" guy, both weighing the same. We can assume the shorter guy is stronger because he'll have more muscle weight and less bones and organs and stuff. Now let's say they both arive at the point of attack with good form and good leverage! The shorter guy will 'win' initially because he's stronger, but the more push he gets the weaker he gets as his legs extend. Meanwhile the taller guy maintains his strength because his legs are longer, which helps negate his disadvantage in muscle power. The shorter guy looses his momentum from his inital point of strength, and if he tries to step foreward he may even be driven back.

Pretty simple really, and you can see how if the taller guy gained some weight he could have a pretty distinct advantage...


Ruckaholics Anonymous: We can help.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,654
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,654
After last weeks game, it was obvious that he has excellent skills as a receiver. This is something that the Browns were really missing and I have been pounding Mangini for the signing of Royal, and not having a pass catcher. Dumping Rucker for Moore is a good thing. In 2 games he has more yards than every other TE and will probably have more yards then them all combined within another week or 2.

Funny thing how those former basketball players make great TE's. cough "Gates" cough.

I may have to rethink the drafting of a TE. This is a player that has earned an opportunity.


Welcome back, Joe, we missed you!
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,867
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,867
Just clicking,

I'm not at all positive that Moore is a good blocker or bad one.. I'm equally not sure he can't become a decent blocker if he sets his mind to it..

Either way, what he seems to do well is catch that damn ball... I can live with that.. without a doubt, it's a step in the right direction...


#GMSTRONG

“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.”
Daniel Patrick Moynahan

"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe."
Damanshot
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,263
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,263
Anybody know why they didn't leave him as a WR? I mean with that height, it seems he would make a great red zone target. Maybe he's to slow? I don't know why we wouldn't at least try him at WR. We need more.


Dawginit since Jan. 24, 2000 Member #180
You can't fix yesterday but you can learn for tomorrow
#GMSTRONG

I want to do it as a Cleveland Brown because that's who I am.”
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,109
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,109
He's still a great redzone target at tight end. He doesn't have the speed to play on the outside and still has the same height advantages.

Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,263
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,263
I understand the (we can still use him in the red zone), I was just wondering why he was a WR in school but was tried at TE. Do you know what his 40 times were?


Dawginit since Jan. 24, 2000 Member #180
You can't fix yesterday but you can learn for tomorrow
#GMSTRONG

I want to do it as a Cleveland Brown because that's who I am.”
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,654
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,654
4.75 at the combine.


Welcome back, Joe, we missed you!
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,825
A
Legend
Online
Legend
A
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,825
Quote:

I understand the (we can still use him in the red zone), I was just wondering why he was a WR in school but was tried at TE. Do you know what his 40 times were?




Just a general reply.

I hate the "stats" on a guy determining if he's a player or not............40 times, jumping ability, height, weight, bench press, shuttle times.....

They may have some merit, but not much. Can a guy play ball......that's all that matters. Or, it should be all that matters.

Someone's too small? He plays great, but he's too small? Crazy, for the most part.

RB X ran a 4.3 40, so he's better than RB Z that ran a 4.6? If you're looking for a sprinter, yes. Other than that? No.

Look at the players. Players play, great "stat" guys fail. Now, find a combination of "player" with "stats", fine. But don't rule a guy out based on NFL combine info. Was he a good player in college? He'll have as good a chance at being a good player in the nfl as some guy that ran faster, or benched more, or jumped higher, etc.

JMO

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,867
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,867
Quote:

hate the "stats" on a guy determining if he's a player or not............40 times, jumping ability, height, weight, bench press, shuttle times.....





I agree with you,,,,,,


How do you measure heart? I've never seen a stat on that,,,,,


#GMSTRONG

“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.”
Daniel Patrick Moynahan

"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe."
Damanshot
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,015
O
Hall of Famer
OP Offline
Hall of Famer
O
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,015
Quote:

How do you measure heart?


By the ounce?

To a point, I agree, but after all these years of refinements and tweaking, the concept of the combines and workouts leading to a draft evaluation is a very sophisticated model that is rather successful.

This kid is a TE because the odds say he doesn't have the speed to be an NFL receiver. Guys like Jurevicius run 4.75 in their last years but can get away with it because of experience and savvy. Coming out of college, these players don't have that, so you can't spend a draft pick on them, as you only gain experience and savvy by playing, and can't play if you aren't fast enough to get seperation, etc etc.

So now the kid was told he had to gain some weight and switch positions. For him, it's the best way to stand a chance at making a career out of this, and I for one am thankful because he shows plenty of promise as a TE/3rd down receiver.

Besides, "heart" only gets you so far. Remember Mike Hart of Michigan? Great guy, smart, tons of heart, team leader.............Can't get a sniff of an NFL game because "heart" can only get you so far. He was recently picked back up off the street by the Colts. Furthering that thought, I bet David Veikune has tons of heart, but that won't help his transition to whatever position they are trying to make him into.

I get the "heart" concept, but it only goes so far.


***Gordon, I really didn't think you could be this stOOpid, but you exceeded my expectations. Wussy.
Manziel, see Josh Gordon. Dumbass.***
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,867
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,867
I wasn't speaking strickly about Moore.. I was making a general statement that you can't measure heart.

Kosar wouldn't be a 1st round pick now a days.. He was gawky, non-mobile, threw sidearm and slow as molassas running.. can you imagine his 40 times


#GMSTRONG

“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.”
Daniel Patrick Moynahan

"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe."
Damanshot
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,850
N
Legend
Offline
Legend
N
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,850
Quote:

I wasn't speaking strickly about Moore.. I was making a general statement that you can't measure heart.

Kosar wouldn't be a 1st round pick now a days.. He was gawky, non-mobile, threw sidearm and slow as molassas running.. can you imagine his 40 times




I don't know...Roethlisburger is pretty slow.....VY throws side-arm. And if Kosar still career with UofMiami....

I think he'd probably drop like Campbell and Rodgers, but he'd probably still be a late-1st / early-2nd round pick


#gmstrong
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,867
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,867
Quote:

I don't know...Roethlisburger is pretty slow.....VY throws side-arm.




Yes Ben is slow, but he is big and strong and throws in a more classic manner...

I never knew that VY threw sidearm, guess I never noticed, but I'll accept that.. but he's big, strong and fast and mobile..

Kosar doesn't have the good of Young and Ben, but he had all the bad of both....

Big difference..


#GMSTRONG

“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.”
Daniel Patrick Moynahan

"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe."
Damanshot
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,850
N
Legend
Offline
Legend
N
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,850
VY's release is really about half-way between side-arm and over the shoulder, really a strange throw, but it works for him.

-----------------------------

What Kosar had going for him over both was his ridiculous accuracy. Adding into that bringing a program up to prominence and delivering Miami's 1st national championship would have really put him in the spotlight....

plus, he played in a pro-style passing game, which also would have helped his draft status.


#gmstrong
Page 1 of 2 1 2
DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Pure Football Forum Who is Evan Moore, and.........who is he again?

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5