|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 901
All Pro
|
OP
All Pro
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 901 |
I'm sitting here on Sat morning, getting ready to go fishing. Drinking a coffee, and watching a little sportcenter. Flip to NFL network and 2007 Patriots vs Giants. IMO opinion that simply sucks. I'm wondering of other dawgs think so, and what you'd want to see on NFL network (who owns all the footage ). What I'm talking about is there has been ACTUAL football going on. For THIS freaking year!. Heck start doing Total Access every other half hour like ESPN does with sportscenter. Something. I saw one shot last night in front of the Cowboys training center. That's it. I'm a junkie........show me anything about football that concerns this upcoming season. Reading some of the posts in Pure football made me realize how much there is to football. Here's what I would do to NFL network if I were in charge. 1. Develop Total Access to more like Sportcenter. Or Keep Total Access the way it is, and make a new show. Shorter, faster paced show, half an hour, and 2 or three versions a day. morning and 6pm at least. 2. More use of old game footage, but only as it relates to the upcoming year. Show team analysis, but WHY they think say a team can run, but showing more and better footage. All the positions, from zooming in on the left side of the line then the right side, running backs QB, Blocking of WRs. All the stuff you don't get to see in games. 3. Have more shows on each team or division. 4. A show showing various techniques for each position. Like showing the top ten left tackles in the league and what makes them good. Like how to use your hands effectively. And footwork. 5. Some will hate this, but a half hour fantasy football only show.
There's five fast ideas. That networks just wastes SO much time with stuff that isn't usually very interesting.........like the top ten show. Who cares who the top ten "snakebit" franchises are? (that was on thursday, and usually once a week) Especially when there IS football to show/talk about. What do you think?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 13,260 Likes: 342
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 13,260 Likes: 342 |
I'm witht you for the most part, especially on this one: Quote:
More use of old game footage, but only as it relates to the upcoming year. Show team analysis, but WHY they think say a team can run, but showing more and better footage. All the positions, from zooming in on the left side of the line then the right side, running backs QB, Blocking of WRs. All the stuff you don't get to see in games. 3. Have more shows on each team or division.
I'm a fairly avid watcher of NFL Network... not as much lately but have watched for several years now.
For one thing they don't do enough on the teams, I agree... they'll go weeks without barely mentioning some teams, on the flip side they beat some things to death. They pounded the Jay Cutler thing into the ground last March.... ... other things I don't like: they're always way behind the times with some teams, Warren Sapp and Marshall Faulk both get on my nerves. I like Fran Charles, I hated Adam Sphincter.
I realize these guys for the most part are shills for the NFL, but how about a little tiny bit of objective journalism once in awhile???? Stories maybe on the threat of franchise moves in the NFL (don't we know it), good human intrest stories (one good one they did a couple years ago was ex-Brown and now Saints tight end Mark Campbell, who filmed a documentary on hurricane Katrina. There's gotta be a lot of good guys in the NFL, not just TO and Mike Vick and other criminals.
I agree about making Total Access 30 minutes but doing them two or three times a day... especially during the season, playoffs draft and TC. Maybe they're cheap???
I like the Top 10s, myself. I like the Classic games, but too may of them are from recent seasons.
And could they please get their heads out of the rear ends of teams like Dallas, NY Jets & Giants and New England?
Just a few thoughts
Last edited by lampdogg; 08/01/09 03:01 PM.
![[Linked Image from i28.photobucket.com]](http://i28.photobucket.com/albums/c201/shadedog/mcenroe2.jpg) gmstrong -----------------
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,825 Likes: 158
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,825 Likes: 158 |
Sucky or otherwise,, I wish I had the NFL Network... Time Warner and the NFL have yet to reach an agreement...
I doubt they ever will the way it's going.
#GMSTRONG
“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.” Daniel Patrick Moynahan
"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe." Damanshot
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,346
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,346 |
Quote:
Sucky or otherwise,, I wish I had the NFL Network... Time Warner and the NFL have yet to reach an agreement...
I doubt they ever will the way it's going.
...and I don't blame TW based on the way that NFLN structured it, but that is a different topic.
LIke Damon I don't have NFLN, but.....
Quote:
3. Have more shows on each team or division. 4. A show showing various techniques for each position. Like showing the top ten left tackles in the league and what makes them good. Like how to use your hands effectively. And footwork.
3. It would be in their best interest to be sure to include all teams. WBNS (ch 10, Columbus) will drop the Browns if ratings are not to their liking. Again, I won't fault them for this decision since it is about making money, but regional broadcasting has played a huge part in making the NFL what it is today. If Fart got anything right, he understood that.
4. I am surprised that NFLN doesn't excel at illustrating what makes good football. I don't get to see much MNF, but I really like their use of video enhancements (isolation zooms, play charting, etc.). Such digital techniques may be the property of ABC / ESPN, but I think that if you combine that with some real football know how, then you have some worthwhile Football 101.
Quote:
And could they please get their heads out of the rear ends of teams like Dallas, NY Jets & Giants and New England?
If that is the case then that is shortsighted (see my regional broadcasting point). The NFL should be smart enough to market the entire prodcuct.
Classic games and story telling by players and coaches is always enjoyable. I liked the interview that the Browns site put up of Greg Pruitt explaining how he accidentally ended up walking into the Steelers locker room after beating them in his rookie year. 
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,027 Likes: 2
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,027 Likes: 2 |
i wish they'd show more games. and i watch nfln all the time and haven't seen a broadcast for any browns game since the season ended. lame. how about replaying the browns/giants game?
the top ten shows are stupid. they're all subjective.
and they play the same nfl helping in the community commercials, eli mannin, bob sanders, santana moss, and adrian peterson, seriously, new commercials. you're the freaking nfl.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 901
All Pro
|
OP
All Pro
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 901 |
That's what kills me too. I mean that channel should be HUGE, but they screw it up. Tonight there is nothing new on at all until total access. . theres another top ten show, TA, footballs greatest games for 4 HOURS!! (then TA again and repeat the 4 HOUR greatest games. ) I mean they own the footage!! It's the NFL!! Show us the Top 10 current players at each spot and then back it up w/technical footoge. Something. Training camps are going on!! Players are getting hurt already (Tavaris Jackson is down for a little while). Other players are/will be getting cut........who are they, and are they usefull for someone else? Drives me nuts!! 
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,476 Likes: 956
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,476 Likes: 956 |
It's a crappy channel. The only reason I added it to my package is the Thursday night games they show live come about mid season.
If they didn't have those, I wouldn't watch...I may have scanned it 3 weeks ago.
If everybody had like minds, we would never learn. GM Strong
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 15,015 Likes: 147
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 15,015 Likes: 147 |
When I first started getting it, it was good. Had decent shows like what camp life was like, or behind the scenes during the season. The "news" shows were decent.
but it did seem the last couple of years they just regurgitate the same crap over and over. It seemed like they had original programming 1 day a week, then replayed everything the rest of the week.
It is for that reason I didn't mind having to give it up when we were looking to shave our budget a bit.
We don't have to agree with each other, to respect each others opinion.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,365 Likes: 48
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,365 Likes: 48 |
It dosen't sound much different than the big 10 network which I watch maybe 10 times a year at most between buckeye football and basketball games.
I can sort of understand just a little bit where TIme Warner is coming from. But how many other crappy channels do they have on the basic package that regurgitate the same stuff over and over. <cough vh1 etc...etc...etc...> Basic Cable in general sucks, they could add it and it wouldn't hurt them.
Last edited by Psydeffect; 08/01/09 10:24 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,223
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,223 |
Quote:
i wish they'd show more games. and i watch nfln all the time and haven't seen a broadcast for any browns game since the season ended. lame. how about replaying the browns/giants game?
I've seen at least 2 games. The Browns-Giants game and the Browns-Jags game. This is when they were replaying the season, showing a few of the better games each week.
"The Browns' defense is kicking mucho dupa."
|
|
|
DawgTalkers.net
Forums DawgTalk Tailgate Forum Rant: Why Does the NFL network
suck so bad usually?
|
|