|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,349
Hall of Famer
|
OP
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,349 |
Many Taxpayers Stand to Gain From New Laws by Tom Herman Wednesday, January 7, 2009
provided by wsjlogo.gif
Wealthy Likely to Benefit Most From 2009 Changes; Putting More in Your 401(k)
New Year's Day brought relief for most taxpayers, especially upper-income ones -- even as President-elect Barack Obama is proposing new tax cuts as part of his wide-ranging economic-stimulus package.
Starting Jan. 1, the basic federal estate-tax exemption jumped to $3.5 million from $2 million in 2008. This large increase is expected to result in a major decline in the number of estates subject to the tax for 2009. It also will mean significant tax savings for many larger estates that are affected, says Sidney Kess, a New York lawyer and accountant.
Among other notable changes: The maximum amount that savers can contribute to a 401(k) plan increased. Many high-income taxpayers will benefit from changes affecting personal exemptions and certain deductions. And many Americans who live and work in other countries will be able to exclude more of their pay from U.S. tax collectors.
But not all the automatic 2009 changes will spell relief. For one thing, many people who suffer personal casualty and theft losses in 2009 won't be able to deduct as much. And about 11 million workers will pay higher Social Security taxes this year.
Standard Deductions
* The basic standard deduction for joint filers for the 2009 tax year will be $11,400, up from $10,900 for 2008. * For singles, the amount for 2009 will be $5,700, up from $5,450. * The amounts are higher for those age 65 or older, for the blind, for those who paid real-estate taxes and for those with losses from federally declared disasters.
Much larger changes are expected soon from Washington in response to the economic crisis. President-elect Obama and congressional leaders are working on a wide-ranging plan that includes large cuts for both individuals and businesses.
While it's not yet known what will become law or when the changes will take effect, Congress will likely pass relief from the alternative minimum tax, or AMT. Unless lawmakers do something, tens of millions of Americans will have to pay higher taxes for 2009.
Here are some of the major changes that automatically became law on Jan. 1. While these won't affect tax returns for 2008, they may help taxpayers with 2009 planning.
Estate and gift taxes. The increase in the basic estate-tax exemption amount to $3.5 million stems from a 2001 law. (Transfers from one spouse to the other typically remain tax-free.) "Many estate plans and wills will have to be modified to take into account this increased exemption amount," Mr. Kess says.
The top federal estate-tax rate for 2009 remains unchanged at 45%. In 2010, the estate tax is supposed to disappear entirely for that one year only -- but that isn't likely to happen. During the campaign, then-Sen. Obama proposed retaining the $3.5 million exclusion amount and the 45% top rate in coming years.
The annual gift-tax exclusion rose to $13,000, up $1,000 from 2008. This means you can give as much as $13,000 this year to anyone you wish, or to as many people as you want, without having to worry about taxes or even having to file any forms with the Internal Revenue Service. It's a simple way to help others and reduce the size of your taxable estate. You can give even more than that by paying directly for someone else's tuition or medical expenses. Just be sure to pay the institution directly.
The lifetime gift-tax exclusion amount remains unchanged at $1 million.
WSJ010908.gif
Retirement savings. The maximum amount that someone under age 50 can contribute to a 401(k) plan for 2009 rose to $16,500 from $15,500. Those 50 or older can put away an additional $5,500 this year, for a total of $22,000, up from $20,500.
Minimum distributions. President George W. Bush recently signed legislation that allows millions of people who are 70½ or older to skip taking distributions from IRAs and certain other retirement plans during 2009. That new law, however, didn't provide any relief for 2008 -- as many investors had been hoping for from Congress, the Treasury Department or both.
Social Security taxes. The maximum amount of earnings subject to Social Security taxes rose to $106,800, up 4.7% from $102,000 in 2008. That means the maximum additional tax on an employee earning above last year's wage base will be $297.60, according to CCH, a unit of Wolters Kluwer. High-income self-employed workers may owe as much as $595.20 in additional self-employment tax but can recoup some of it through deducting it on their federal income-tax return, CCH said.
Nanny taxes. Employers who pay nannies and other household employees a certain amount, or more, each year typically are required to pay Social Security and Medicare taxes on their wages. For 2009, the dollar threshold is $1,700, up from $1,600 for 2008, says Mark Luscombe of CCH.
Working in other countries. Many Americans who live and work abroad are eligible to exclude a certain amount of their pay from U.S. income taxes. The so-called foreign earned income exclusion for 2009 is $91,400, up from $87,600 for 2008, Mr. Luscombe says.
Casualty and theft losses. For 2008, the general rule for most taxpayers was that personal casualty and theft losses could be deducted only to the extent they exceeded 10% of adjusted gross income -- and that was after reducing each loss by $100. But for 2009, that $100 dollar amount rose to $500. For more details, see IRS Publication 17 on the IRS Web site.
Mileage rates. Taxpayers who use their vehicles for work can deduct their actual costs or rely on the IRS's optional standard mileage rate. This year, the IRS rate for using your car for business will be 55 cents a mile. That's down from 58.5 cents in the second half of 2008 but up from 50.5 cents in the first half. Separately, the IRS rate for medical or moving purposes will be 24 cents a mile. That's down from 27 cents in last year's second half but up from 19 cents in the first half. The mileage rate for helping charitable organizations remains unchanged at 14 cents; this one is set by law, not the IRS.
Stealth taxes. These refer to laws that increase taxes owed by millions of upper-income Americans without actually raising the official tax rates. They're known as stealth taxes because they're often complex and difficult to detect.
Among them is a provision known as "Pease," named after a former congressman, which imposes limits on certain itemized deductions for taxpayers whose incomes exceed a certain amount. The good news for taxpayers is that the dollar threshold rose again: For the 2009 tax year, most taxpayers will begin to lose some of the value of these itemized deductions if their adjusted gross income exceeds $166,800, up from $159,950 in 2008.
Another stealth-tax provision imposes limits on personal-exemption amounts. Warning: Calculating the precise limits can be tricky, especially because of tax-law changes that have reduced the amount of those limits.
You may be in the drivers seat but God is holding the map. #GMSTRONG
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,820 Likes: 515
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,820 Likes: 515 |
I'm curious as to why a death tax even exists. The money in an estate has been taxed. The gains on any savings have been taxed. I understand taxing retirement money if you take it out early. However, that is not what the death tax goes after.
If you get down to brass tacks, it's double taxation.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,349
Hall of Famer
|
OP
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,349 |
Quote:
I'm curious as to why a death tax even exists. The money in an estate has been taxed. The gains on any savings have been taxed. I understand taxing retirement money if you take it out early. However, that is not what the death tax goes after.
If you get down to brass tacks, it's double taxation.
I agree, it is crazy that you can work your whole life to be able to leave something for your wife and kids and then they tax it? You already paid taes on it when you made it. Oh well, I have to admit I dont understand much about tax code at all.
KING
You may be in the drivers seat but God is holding the map. #GMSTRONG
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,663 Likes: 1
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,663 Likes: 1 |
I agree the death tax is retarded. It's not likely to affect me as it stands now with the first $3.5 million is exempt. But it's still retarded to tax up to 45% of anything above that 3.5 million.
KeysDawg
The fact that some geniuses were laughed at does not imply that all who are laughed at are geniuses. - Carl Sagan
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,349
Hall of Famer
|
OP
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,349 |
Like I said, I dont know a whole lot about tax codes and economics, so if the way I understand the law to work is off,excuse me.
My understanding of the death tax, is that it was put in to help prevent very wealthy people from hiding money from taxation.
KING
You may be in the drivers seat but God is holding the map. #GMSTRONG
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,659
Poser
|
Poser
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,659 |
This really does make me scratch my head, too. As you know, I sold a business and paid my capital gains tax when I went into college coaching. The house and cars are in my name and paid for. I also have a $3.1 million life insurance policy. Whenver something happens to me, my wife is going to be over that limit and is going to have to pay taxes on what is supposed to last her the rest of her life?!?!?!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,349
Hall of Famer
|
OP
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,349 |
DO you pay death taxes on a life insurance payout?? Is the death tax paid on total assets? If it is,does she get taxed on the value of the home and everything? Does she get taxed on the whole amount, or just the amount over 3.5 mill?
KING
You may be in the drivers seat but God is holding the map. #GMSTRONG
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,825 Likes: 158
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,825 Likes: 158 |
Quote:
I'm curious as to why a death tax even exists. The money in an estate has been taxed. The gains on any savings have been taxed. I understand taxing retirement money if you take it out early. However, that is not what the death tax goes after.
If you get down to brass tacks, it's double taxation.
Never quite got a handle on that either.. didn't make sense to me and still doesn't....
#GMSTRONG
“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.” Daniel Patrick Moynahan
"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe." Damanshot
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,663 Likes: 1
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,663 Likes: 1 |
There are many ways you can shelter your estate from taxes. I would encourage anyone who thinks they may be at or near that $3.5 million threshold to consult a estate planner.
KeysDawg
The fact that some geniuses were laughed at does not imply that all who are laughed at are geniuses. - Carl Sagan
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,820 Likes: 515
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,820 Likes: 515 |
Quote:
This really does make me scratch my head, too. As you know, I sold a business and paid my capital gains tax when I went into college coaching. The house and cars are in my name and paid for. I also have a $3.1 million life insurance policy. Whenver something happens to me, my wife is going to be over that limit and is going to have to pay taxes on what is supposed to last her the rest of her life?!?!?!
The way I understand it is if it is going to a spouse, it is not taxed under the death tax provision. I may be wrong, but I'd bet $10 I'm not. And $10 means something to me.
Now, if something were to happen to a person, and life insurance,investments, etc put them over the threshold - as long as it went to a spouse, the death tax doesn't come into play. However, if and when something happens to the spouse, the money/estate is then subject to the death tax before it can go to the kids, or charity, etc. The way I understand it. And trust me, unless I win the lottery, I don't need to worry about it, and neither does my wife or kids.
I just don't see it as being fair. You die with $4 million of assets? Why should $500,000 of that be open to a 45% tax? You paid tax as you earned it, why tax it again? And I don't care if you're worth $400 million, why should the gov't. take 45% of $396,500,000?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 478
1st String
|
1st String
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 478 |
Quote:
This really does make me scratch my head, too. As you know, I sold a business and paid my capital gains tax when I went into college coaching. The house and cars are in my name and paid for. I also have a $3.1 million life insurance policy. Whenver something happens to me, my wife is going to be over that limit and is going to have to pay taxes on what is supposed to last her the rest of her life?!?!?!
i agree that the death tax is stupid. I could be wrong here, but I don't think that the cost of the cars, house and other assets will be taxed if you have joint ownership of the assets and one person is still alive.
I believe that they become subject to the inheritance tax when all parties owning them are deceased. I am not an accountant or lawyer. So i could be mistaken, but that is my understanding of the law.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,820 Likes: 515
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,820 Likes: 515 |
Quote:
There are many ways you can shelter your estate from taxes. I would encourage anyone who thinks they may be at or near that $3.5 million threshold to consult a estate planner.
And sadly, those that DO have estates that large also have paid to enable a large percentage of their estate protected. It's just sad, in my opinion, that the gov't feels they are entitled to 45% of your wealth if you HAVEN'T done that. Actually, check that last statement: I think it's sad, and robbery, for the gov't to think it is entitled to 45% regardless.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,663 Likes: 1
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,663 Likes: 1 |
We see eye to eye yet again Arch.
KeysDawg
The fact that some geniuses were laughed at does not imply that all who are laughed at are geniuses. - Carl Sagan
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,349
Hall of Famer
|
OP
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,349 |
Quote:
I could be wrong here, but I don't think that the cost of the cars, house and other assets will be taxed if you have joint ownership of the assets and one person is still alive.
It doesnt matter whether they have joint ownership or not. They are married, unless one of them had that stuff before they were married and there is a pre-nup. It does not matter whos nam the titles or deeds are in. It is community property and if one of them passes, the assets are the property of the other spouse.
KING
You may be in the drivers seat but God is holding the map. #GMSTRONG
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,663 Likes: 1
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,663 Likes: 1 |
Actually, that varies by the state you live in and the state where your property is located. The states all have different laws on this. This article gives you a idea on some of that.
KeysDawg
The fact that some geniuses were laughed at does not imply that all who are laughed at are geniuses. - Carl Sagan
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,476 Likes: 956
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,476 Likes: 956 |
Quote:
I agree the death tax is retarded. It's not likely to affect me as it stands now with the first $3.5 million is exempt. But it's still retarded to tax up to 45% of anything above that 3.5 million.
They don't want people to be able to pass money and keep the money in the family...it is simply another money grab.
Too many free loaders in this country...
If everybody had like minds, we would never learn. GM Strong
|
|
|
DawgTalkers.net
Forums DawgTalk Tailgate Forum Tax Law Changes That Benefit All?
|
|