|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,253
Hall of Famer
|
OP
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,253 |
Part 1 In just one year. Remember the election in 2006? Thought you might like to read the following: A little over one year ago: 1) Consumer confidence stood at a 2 1/2 year high; 2) Regular gasoline sold for $2.19 a gallon; 3) The unemployment rate was 4.5%. Since voting in a Democratic Congress in 2006 we have seen: 1) Consumer confidence plummet; 2) The cost of regular gasoline soar to over $3.50 a gallon; 3) Unemployment is up to 5% (a 10% increase); 4) American households have seen $2.3 trillion in equity value evaporate (stock and mutual fund losses); 5) Americans have seen their home equity drop by $1.2 trillion dollars; 6) 1% of American homes are in foreclosure. America voted for change in 2006, and we got it! Remember it's Congress that makes law not the President. He has to work with what's handed to him. Part 2: Taxes...Whether Democrat or a Republican you will find these statistics enlightening and amazing. www.taxfoundation.org/publications/show/151.html Taxes under Clinton 1999 Taxes under Bush 2008 Single making 30K - tax $8,400 Single making 30K - tax $4,500 Single making 50K - tax $14,000 Single making 50K - tax $12,500 Single making 75K - tax $23,250 Single making 75K - tax $18,750 Married making 60K - tax $16,800 Married making 60K- tax $9,000 Married making 75K - tax $21,000 Married making 75K - tax $18,750 Married making 125K - tax $38,750 Married making 125K - tax $31,250 Both democratic candidates will return to the higher tax rates. It is amazing how many people that fall into the categories above think Bush is screwing them and Bill Clinton was the greatest President ever. If Obama or Hillary are elected, they both say they will repeal the Bush tax cuts and a good portion of the people that fall into the categories above can't wait for it to happen. This is like the movie The Sting with Paul Newman; you scam somebody out of some money and they don't even know what happened. PART 3: You think the war in Iraq is costing us too much? Read this: Boy, am I confused. I have been hammered with the propaganda that it is the Iraq war and the war on terror that is bankrupting us.& it. I now find that to be RIDICULOUS. I hope the following 14 reasons are forwarded over and over again until they are read so many times that the reader gets sick of reading them. I have included the URL's for verification of all the following facts. 1. $11 Billion to $22 billion is spent on welfare to illegal aliens each year by state governments. Verify at: http://tinyurl.com/zob77 2. $2.2 Billion dollars a year is spent on food assistance programs such as food stamps, WIC, and free school lunches for illegal aliens. Verify at: http://www.cis.org/articles/2004/fiscalexec.html 3. $2.5 Billion dollars a year is spent on Medicaid for illegal aliens. Verify at: http://www.cis.org/articles/2004/fiscalexec.html 4. $12 Billion dollars a year is spent on primary and secondary school education for children here illegally and they cannot speak a word of English! Verify at: http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0604/01/ldt.0.html5. $17 Billion dollars a year is spent for education for the American-born children of illegal aliens, known as anchor babies. Verify at http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0604/01/ldt.01.html 6. $3 Million Dollars a DAY is spent to incarcerate illegal aliens. Verify at: http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0604/01/ldt.01.html 7. 30% percent of all Federal Prison inmates are illegal aliens. Verify at: http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0604/01/ldt.01.html 8. $90 Billion Dollars a year is spent on illegal aliens for Welfare & social services by the American taxpayers. Verify at: http://premium.cnn.com/TRANSCIPTS/0610/29/ldt.01.html 9. $200 Billion Dollars a year in suppressed American wages are caused by the illegal aliens. Verify at: http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0604/01/ldt.01.html 10. The illegal aliens in the United States have a crime rate that's two and a half times that of white non-illegal aliens. In particular, their children, are going to make a huge additional crime problem in the US Verify at: http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0606/12/ldt.01.html 11. During the year of 2005 there were 4 to 10 MILLION illegal aliens that crossed our Southern Border also, as many as 19,500 illegal aliens from Terrorist Countries. Millions of pounds of drugs, cocaine, meth, heroin and marijuana, crossed into the U. S from the Southern border. Verify at: Homeland Security Report: http://tinyurl.com/t9sht 12. The National Policy Institute, 'estimated that the total cost of mass deportation would be between $206 and $230 billion or an average cost of between $41 and $46 billion annually over a five year period.' Verify at: http://www.nationalpolicyinstitute.org/pdf/deportation.pdf 13.. In 2006 illegal aliens sent home $45 BILLION in remittances back to their countries of origin. Verify at: http://www.rense.com/general75/niht.htm The total cost is a whopping $ 338.3 BILLION DOLLARS A YEAR. Quote of the Day........'My friends, we live in the greatest nation in the history of the world. I hope you'll join with me as we try to change it.' -- Barack Obama Are we THAT stupid? Its all fun and games until somebody gets hurt.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,246
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,246 |
Part 1: link Nice try, though, bucko. Part 2: link At least that one was rated "partly true." So, I'll give you partial credit. Part 3: I didn't find anything on Snopes, but I'll just say that everything you claim there may be true. That doesn't justify the expense in Iraq, though. JMHO
I am unfamiliar with this feeling of optimism
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 449
1st String
|
1st String
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 449 |
Regardless of the war in Iraq these are issues we face and need to do something about.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,253
Hall of Famer
|
OP
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,253 |
Quote:
Part 1: link
Nice try, though, bucko.
Part 2:
link
At least that one was rated "partly true." So, I'll give you partial credit.
Part 3:
I didn't find anything on Snopes, but I'll just say that everything you claim there may be true. That doesn't justify the expense in Iraq, though.
JMHO
I heard Nancy Pelosi say that within 100 days of being voted in the Dems would have gas prices under control. The other stuff is debateable.....Bucko
Last edited by Dawg Duty; 05/23/08 07:04 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,465
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,465 |
We're in the midst of the worst president in our nation's history, and possibly the worst Congress as well...of course the people want change.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,253
Hall of Famer
|
OP
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,253 |
Quote:
We're in the midst of the worst president in our nation's history, and possibly the worst Congress as well...of course the people want change.
Sez you and other liberals Phil. Quit listening to the lefty media and learn to think for yourself.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,465
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,465 |
Quote:
Quote:
We're in the midst of the worst president in our nation's history, and possibly the worst Congress as well...of course the people want change.
Sez you and other liberals Phil. Quit listening to the lefty media and learn to think for yourself.
I forgot that you are one of the small percentage of the population that think Bush has done a good job.
Just about EVERYONE thinks Bush has done a bad job. It's not liberals or the media or Democrats -- the man has zero fiscal responsibility - he's spent and spent and spent on bigger and bigger government while cutting taxes, he started an unnecessary war that will cost trillions and kill hundreds of thousands, his reforms have absolutely butchered the education systems and his health care initiatives have done nothing but worsen the situation for Americans.
Stop acting like the media tarnished Bush. The guy has been an awful president and for the most part both sides of the aisle agree. I think we have three awfully weak candidates for president, and any of of them would be an upgrade.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,253
Hall of Famer
|
OP
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,253 |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
We're in the midst of the worst president in our nation's history, and possibly the worst Congress as well...of course the people want change.
Sez you and other liberals Phil. Quit listening to the lefty media and learn to think for yourself.
I forgot that you are one of the small percentage of the population that think Bush has done a good job.
Just about EVERYONE thinks Bush has done a bad job. It's not liberals or the media or Democrats -- the man has zero fiscal responsibility - he's spent and spent and spent on bigger and bigger government while cutting taxes, he started an unnecessary war that will cost trillions and kill hundreds of thousands, his reforms have absolutely butchered the education systems and his health care initiatives have done nothing but worsen the situation for Americans.
Stop acting like the media tarnished Bush. The guy has been an awful president and for the most part both sides of the aisle agree. I think we have three awfully weak candidates for president, and any of of them would be an upgrade.
By EVERYONE I guess you mean Brainwashed college kids like Ammo, enviromentalists, teachers unions, Soccer Moms and the Gimme Gimme crowd. But to set your mind at ease Phil I also do not think Bush has done a very good job. He has done a better job than the media has led us to believe. And if you think Bush is not fiscal responsable, wait till Hillary or Obama gets in and starts raising taxes for their programs so they can throw money at their projects. The school system might be a mess around the country but it sure isn't Bush's fault. Take a look at the liberal idiots that run our schools. Throwing money at them won't help. Yeah, I don't like any of the 3 either. Hillary or Obama might be the ruin of this country. McCain is to middle of the road and lets face it the Democratic congress will run us all to the poor house before they would let Mac make any improvments. Things do not look good.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 156
Practice Squad
|
Practice Squad
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 156 |
No, I think he means everyone, except those that have certainly had to be in an 8 year coma. Let's see, it's because of the republicans that things went ok during Billys stay, and it's the democrats fault that Georgey sucks. 
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,955
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,955 |
Quote:
By EVERYONE I guess you mean Brainwashed college kids like Ammo, enviromentalists, teachers unions, Soccer Moms and the Gimme Gimme crowd.
Hmmm, I am none of those things and think he's sucked. Got any more labels?
#gmstrong #gmlapdance
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,465
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,465 |
Quote:
By EVERYONE I guess you mean Brainwashed college kids like Ammo, enviromentalists, teachers unions, Soccer Moms and the Gimme Gimme crowd.
No...I mean just about anyone. Do you live in the woods? 
Quote:
And if you think Bush is not fiscal responsable, wait till Hillary or Obama gets in and starts raising taxes for their programs so they can throw money at their projects.
You know what, I think government spending is entirely wasteful and bureaucratic, but I think overtaxing people to fund it is still a more viable option than spending money that doesn't exist. We're borrowing tons of money for this war, and it's costing us a fortune...and we're not supposed to be concerned about that because we got a check for $300 in the mail? 
Quote:
The school system might be a mess around the country but it sure isn't Bush's fault.
No Child Left Behind ring a bell?
Quote:
Hillary or Obama might be the ruin of this country.
A two party system might be the ruin of this country.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 14,248
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 14,248 |
Quote:
Part 1: link
Nice try, though, bucko.
What?!? You mean that a president or congress can't have full control of an economy within one year of being in power?? Some of us were saying that for years when people wanted to blame Bush for the stock market and economy tanking the minute he got into office. 
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,758
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,758 |
Here is one thing I can never understand. When talking about Illegals, why are we spending any kind of money supporting ANYTHING "illegal"?  Why even call them illegal if we are still going to feed them, educate them, care for their medical needs, etc.
Our honor defend, we will fight to the end, for OHIO! GO BUCKS!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,955
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,955 |
Because it's cheaper than rounding them up and shipping them home? I dunno, I think it's because America is far too nice. 
#gmstrong #gmlapdance
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,667
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,667 |
Quote:
but I think overtaxing people to fund it is still a more viable option than spending money that doesn't exist.
This is stupid too!!!!! You think it is ok to OVERTAX???? It is NEVER ok to overtax...that is why the prefix "over" is attached....because it has gone past acceptable. Here's an idea...how bout we cut spending. Lets not spend....Wow...what an idea....its just so crazy it just might work!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Quote:
We're borrowing tons of money for this war, and it's costing us a fortune
Oh but the fact that more 2/3 of our budget is spent on out of control, ever expanding, dependant forming, bureaucratic laced social programs is not an issue.....just the war that doesn't come anywhere near this amount of spending....I see...thanks for the clarification.....
I thought I was wrong once....but I was mistaken...
What's the use of wearing your lucky rocketship underpants if nobody wants to see them????
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,653
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,653 |
Let's see... use the democratic congress as a whipping boy...
use the president as a whipping boy.
that is why I am ready for change.
Welcome back, Joe, we missed you!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,465
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,465 |
Quote:
You think it is ok to OVERTAX???? It is NEVER ok to overtax...
I don't disagree. I just said that it's just as bad if not worse than just borrowing and borrowing and borrowing. Hooray for Bush, he cut taxes...but he spent like a buffoon. He's like Blimpy. If I had a choice between a politican who spent like crazy and raised taxes or one who spent like crazy and borrowed the money....neither option is pretty, but one carries no logic.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,667
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,667 |
You remembered the part about cutting taxes but you forgot the part about greatly increasing the tax income the government collected....You can blast him for all the spending all you want...Hell I will even join you. But if taxes had stayed at their current rate we would have been in an even worse situation.
Part of the economic regression experienced at the end of Clinton's term was directly related to the tax increases. And part of the economic stabilazation and growth after Clinton left was and is directly tied to the Bush tax cuts.
Hey if you need to slow things down...new taxes are a great way to do it....but do you really think we need to slow this economy down?????
I thought I was wrong once....but I was mistaken...
What's the use of wearing your lucky rocketship underpants if nobody wants to see them????
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,465
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,465 |
Quote:
Part of the economic regression experienced at the end of Clinton's term was directly related to the tax increases.
True, but a larger part was everyone who had speculative money watch it dry up suddenly.
Quote:
And part of the economic stabilazation and growth after Clinton left was and is directly tied to the Bush tax cuts.
I wouldn't call it stabilization and growth...I'd say it's a series of band-aids. We bailed out the airline industry after 9/11 and embarked on two military fronts. We are borrowing money from anyone we can; you can say that taxes slow growth, but having to pay back trillions of dollars tends to slow things down as well. I'm not advocating taxation so much as I'm saying that it's an inevitability when you spend money like we do.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,370
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,370 |
Quote:
Let's see... use the democratic congress as a whipping boy...
use the president as a whipping boy.
that is why I am ready for change.
So, are you buying the ads that say that "McCain is Bush's third term"? I know that lots of sheeple will.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 293
1st String
|
1st String
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 293 |
Since Bush LIED about Iraq, I have loist alot of money in the market. He is a liar and America has gone down hill, Even his dad told him not to go minto Iraq. He is a stubborn old man who just wanted to make money from oil with peoples lives.! JMHO
Going after Bin Laden was 1 thing but Iraq was just another lie about ties with terrorism.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,102
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,102 |
I'm quite sure I want change. But then my feelings towards Bush/McCain and their war is proabably similar to how a right-to-lifer feels about somebody who performs abortions.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,531
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,531 |
Yes I want change.
Our current system is broken on both sides.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,316
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,316 |
Yes I want change. I want less taxes, AND less government spending. 
I AM ALWAYS RIGHT... except when I am wrong.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,278
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,278 |
Quote:
Since Bush LIED about Iraq, I have loist alot of money in the market. He is a liar and America has gone down hill, Even his dad told him not to go minto Iraq. He is a stubborn old man who just wanted to make money from oil with peoples lives.! JMHO
Going after Bin Laden was 1 thing but Iraq was just another lie about ties with terrorism.
I thought every person with a vote, voted to go into Iraq.
It's not like popping a bag of microwave popcorn...it's going to take a long time. And Bush told everyone that a dozen times before and after we struck. He told the truth then and now he's a liar. Whatever.
Now people want to get out and call it "Bush's war". That shortsighted nature of the whole thing makes me sick.
We are in it now...everyone agreed we must go...now its become fashionable to be against it.
No President is going to pull out before the commanders on the ground say we are ready. If they tell you they are going to pull out sooner or along some BS timetable...they are lying to your face. But that won't stop people from voting for them.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,278
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,278 |
The higher the tax rates, the fewer gross dollars get collected. This has been the case since the inception of an income tax.
Taxation has no tie to spending. We need to keep tax rates low and cut spending. I have zero faith that Billary or Obama understand that.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,316
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 27,316 |
I have no faith that any of the three Bozo's running understand it 
I AM ALWAYS RIGHT... except when I am wrong.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 74
Rookie
|
Rookie
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 74 |
Quote:
By EVERYONE I guess you mean Brainwashed college kids like Ammo, enviromentalists, teachers unions, Soccer Moms and the Gimme Gimme crowd.
Please read this, specifically the poll results in 2008.
I didn't realize the gimme gimme crowd, brainwashed college kids, Ammo, environmentalists, teachers unions, and soccer moms made up 70% of the population.
Even Republicans want to distance themselves from Bush.
I'm not a "Bush-hater" or a Democrat, and I don't particularly want to argue about your political opinions. However, to deny the overall disapproval of President Bush by this country's population is almost laughable. The proof is in the polls.
Much respect to ya, even if you wish me the opposite...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 74
Rookie
|
Rookie
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 74 |
Quote:
No President is going to pull out before the commanders on the ground say we are ready. If they tell you they are going to pull out sooner or along some BS timetable...they are lying to your face. But that won't stop people from voting for them.
Wait a minute. If the President is only going to listen to the military, what is the point of having civilian control of the military?
Much respect to ya, even if you wish me the opposite...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,278
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,278 |
McCain clearly understands 50% of it. Better than nothing.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,278
Hall of Famer
|
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,278 |
Quote:
'm not a "Bush-hater" or a Democrat, and I don't particularly want to argue about your political opinions. However, to deny the overall disapproval of President Bush by this country's population is almost laughable. The proof is in the polls.
30% think he is doing a "good" job...that's nearly 1/3 of the people and in the last months of a U.S. President's second term...I think it is insignificant.
Less than 20% think Congress is doing a good job...you know, those good 'ole Congressman who were going to change our world...and then did squat. To ignore THAT is surely laughable.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,825
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 30,825 |
Ah, come on.......I mean, the democrat congress DID raise the minimum wage. They got something accomplished. (please note: this is pure sarcasm).
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,465
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,465 |
Quote:
I thought every person with a vote, voted to go into Iraq.
I believe it was all but 23, with only 6 admitting to reading the intelligence.
Quote:
And Bush told everyone that a dozen times before and after we struck.
Quote:
Now people want to get out and call it "Bush's war". That shortsighted nature of the whole thing makes me sick.
If Bush wasn't the president, we never would've invaded Iraq. Period.
The selective intelligence that his administration crafted would've never been produced or accepted by another administration, R or D.
Quote:
everyone agreed we must go...now its become fashionable to be against it.
I was against it then, I'm against it now and I'll be against it for the next 8-10 years.
Quote:
If they tell you they are going to pull out sooner or along some BS timetable...they are lying to your face. But that won't stop people from voting for them.
You are correct.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,659
Poser
|
Poser
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,659 |
Sigh....same old Phil. Please prove the Bush's administration "crafted" the intelligence. You keep saying that yet you never prove it happened. Also, could I borrow your crystal ball? You claim that no other person would have invaded Iraq "period" as fact. So, since you can see these things, could you please provide me with the winning Mega Millions drawing? I would really appreciate it since you can see such things. 
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 74
Rookie
|
Rookie
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 74 |
Quote:
30% think he is doing a "good" job...that's nearly 1/3 of the people and in the last months of a U.S. President's second term...I think it is insignificant.
What exactly is your point? An overwhelming majority of this country feels he is doing a bad job. Do you think that a 30% approval rating is a good sign for a President?
Much respect to ya, even if you wish me the opposite...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,426
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,426 |
What other country was really looking at Iraq like the US was? Britain got dragged along, as did a few others. But the countries who stood up to us, and were ultimately proven correct, were mocked. Anybody remember freedom fries?  The problem with the administration, or at least my biggest problem, was that they didn't listen to anybody on the outside. If you dissented at home, you didn't support the country or the soldiers. If you dissented and weren't American, you were anti-American and anti-freedom, no matter how wrong those statements were. The media took that and ran with it.
[color:"green"] "World domination has encountered a momentary setback. Please talk amongst yourselves." Get Fuzzy[/color]
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,659
Poser
|
Poser
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,659 |
Of course, those countries that "stood up" to us and were mocked were doing so in their own self interest considering their ties to the Oil for Food scandal.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,426
Dawg Talker
|
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,426 |
Perhaps... but in hindsight they had a point far beyond Oil for Food about the brashness of American foreign policy at the time.
[color:"green"] "World domination has encountered a momentary setback. Please talk amongst yourselves." Get Fuzzy[/color]
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,659
Poser
|
Poser
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,659 |
That's the great thing about hindsight....it's 20/20
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,465
Legend
|
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,465 |
Quote:
Please prove the Bush's administration "crafted" the intelligence.
Here is the first conclusion of the Select Committee Senate Report:
Most of the major key judgments in the Intelligence Community's October 2002 National Intelligence Estimate (NIE), Iraq's Continuing Programs for Weapons of Mass Destruction, either overstated, or were not supported by, the underlying intelligence reporting. A series of failures, particularly in analytic trade craft, led to the mischaracterization of the intelligence.
Note the italicized part is referring not to the intelligence itself, but to how the administration handled it. Are you aware of the Office of Special Plans? The Senate Intelligence Committee's Report of Pre-war Intelligence on Iraq also questions and condemns this office, which was Rumsfeld's office that existed to question the analysis of the CIA's conclusions. It's purpose was to weed out or minimalize evidence and intelligence suggesting that Saddam Hussein was not a threat or linked to al-Qaeda, or at least that's what the Senate saw it as.
And I know you haven't read it, but NONE of the intelligence available stated with certainty or even hesitancy that Hussein had weapons and was an immediate threat -- the worst indictment was that he was in the act of attempting to reconstitute a weapons program...and yet the Bush administrations declarations were of an armed and immediate threat. Hell, just about every committee assigned to investigate this has chastised Bush and Co. for overstating a vague case.
|
|
|
DawgTalkers.net
Forums DawgTalk Tailgate Forum R U sure you want change???
|
|