Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 51,675
Likes: 757
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 51,675
Likes: 757
Originally Posted by PitDAWG
Originally Posted by superbowldogg
Originally Posted by Swish
Jc

Trump picking Vance is a project 2025 milestone.

this was already debunked.

By whom?

By no one.


“To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public.”

- Theodore Roosevelt
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,027
Likes: 70
N
Hall of Famer
OP Online
Hall of Famer
N
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,027
Likes: 70
There has been a tik tok campaign to turn in to the IRS organizations that are on the advisory board on Project 2025 that are listed as 501.c.3 but are engaging in political activity-which would make their tax exempt status invalid.

Several organizations on the Project 2025 advisory board have been asked to be removed from the web page-And they were. Most of the removals were July 15/16 after the people started reported Heritage Foundation to the IRS and the other "non profits" started asked to be removed.


One of those that asked to be removed was America First Legal-America First Legal was involved in Project 2025 since 2022 and were deeply involved in writing and editing the Project 2025 playbook.

AFL® is led by senior members of the Trump administration who were at the forefront of the America First move
Below is from America First Legal About pagement. Our Board of Directors includes President Trump’s former Senior Advisor, Acting Attorney General, and Budget Director. Our senior leadership team has real-world experience carrying out critical legal, policy, and political battles at the highest levels of the U.S. government. link below

https://aflegal.org/about/

Who is America First Legal's President-
Stephen Miller
President, America First Legal
Stephen Miller served in the West Wing as Senior Advisor to the President for the entirety of the Trump Administration. Prior to that he was a senior aide to lawmakers and committees in the United States Congress.

Yeah, Miller doesn't have anything to do with the trump campaign-only like running it.

So yeah, trump is lying about this one too

1 member likes this: mgh888
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 70,208
Likes: 1443
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 70,208
Likes: 1443
Originally Posted by northlima dawg
Who is America First Legal's President-
Stephen Miller
President, America First Legal
Stephen Miller served in the West Wing as Senior Advisor to the President for the entirety of the Trump Administration. Prior to that he was a senior aide to lawmakers and committees in the United States Congress.

Yeah, Miller doesn't have anything to do with the trump campaign-only like running it.

So yeah, trump is lying about this one too

The only thing that would be shocking about any of this is if trump wasn't lying about it.


Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,773
Likes: 109
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,773
Likes: 109
"What is Project 2025?" The Republican bible



Joe Thomas #73
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,328
Likes: 226
Hall of Famer
Online
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,328
Likes: 226
The New Republic

Opinion
J.D. Vance in Serious Trouble After Damning Project 2025 Book Foreword
Robert McCoy
Wed, July 24, 2024 at 12:10 PM EDT·2 min read


As Trump desperately tries to separate his campaign from Project 2025, users on X have noted one big problem: J.D. Vance wrote the foreword to a forthcoming book by the plan’s lead author, Heritage Foundation President Kevin Roberts.

On the Amazon product page, the promotional material for the book, titled Dawn’s Early Light, highlights Roberts’s role in composing Project 2025, the Heritage Foundation proposal for a conservative overhaul of the federal government.

The product page also includes a favorable review from Vance. “Never before has a figure with Roberts’s depth and stature within the American Right tried to articulate a genuinely new future for conservatism,” the review says. “We are now all realizing that it’s time to circle the wagons and load the muskets. In the fights that lay ahead, these ideas are an essential weapon.”

When the book first became available for preorder on June 19, Vance promoted it on X, writing, “I was thrilled to write the foreword for this incredible book, which contains a bold new vision for the future of conservatism in America.”

On the Amazon page for Dawn’s Early Light, the subtitle reads, “Taking Back Washington to Save America,” but an archived version of the page from June 19 indicates it was initially “Burning Down Washington to Save America.”

Inflammatory language in the blurb has also apparently been tamped down.

A sentence on the archived page that says the book “blazes a warpath for the American people to take back their country” now says it “blazes a promising path.” Another fiery sentence on the archived page read, “Just as a controlled burn preserves the longevity of a forest, conservatives need to burn down these institutions [the FBI, The New York Times, the Department of Education, etc.] if we’re to preserve the American Way of life.” It now says that those institutions “need to be dissolved if the American way of life is to be passed down to future generations.”

These changes, while slight, perhaps indicate a hope to dispel the emerging public perception that Project 2025 would wreak havoc on the country. Trump, undoubtedly aware of the plan’s growing unpopularity, has claimed, “I know nothing about Project 2025” and that “some of the things they’re saying are absolutely ridiculous and abysmal.”

But it will certainly be harder for the Republican ticket to distance itself from the Heritage Foundation manifesto come publication day in Septem

https://www.yahoo.com/news/j-d-vance-serious-trouble-161028272.html


Don't blame the clown for acting like a clown.
Ask yourself why you keep going to the circus.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 32,901
Likes: 684
O
Legend
Offline
Legend
O
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 32,901
Likes: 684
Hopefully, President Harris will use the new powers bestowed upon POTUS by SCOTUS to purge this fascism from our government. Shady Vance would be on that list.


GM Strong!

Go Browns! Win it all!
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,027
Likes: 70
N
Hall of Famer
OP Online
Hall of Famer
N
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,027
Likes: 70
https://www.cnn.com/2024/07/11/politics/trump-allies-project-2025/index.html


Trump claims not to know who is behind Project 2025. A CNN review found at least 140 people who worked for him are involved
By Steve Contorno, CNN
8 minute read
Updated 2:45 PM EDT, Thu July 11, 2024




PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA - AUGUST 6: Democratic presidential candidate, U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris and Democratic vice presidential candidate Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz appear on stage together during a campaign event at Girard College on August 6, 2024 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Harris ended weeks of speculation about who her running mate would be, selecting the 60-year-old midwestern governor over other candidates. (Photo by Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)

CNN

Donald Trump has lately made clear he wants little to do with Project 2025, the conservative blueprint for the next Republican president that has attracted considerable blowback in his race for the White House.

“I have no idea who is behind it,” the former president recently claimed on social media.

Many people Trump knows quite well are behind it.

Six of his former Cabinet secretaries helped write or collaborated on the 900-page playbook for a second Trump term published by the Heritage Foundation. Four individuals Trump nominated as ambassadors were also involved, along with several enforcers of his controversial immigration crackdown. And about 20 pages are credited to his first deputy chief of staff.

In fact, at least 140 people who worked in the Trump administration had a hand in Project 2025, a CNN review found, including more than half of the people listed as authors, editors and contributors to “Mandate for Leadership,” the project’s extensive manifesto for overhauling the executive branch.

Dozens more who staffed Trump’s government hold positions with conservative groups advising Project 2025, including his former chief of staff Mark Meadows and longtime adviser Stephen Miller. These groups also include several lawyers deeply involved in Trump’s attempts to remain in power, such as his impeachment attorney Jay Sekulow and two of the legal architects of his failed bid to overturn the 2020 presidential election, Cleta Mitchell and John Eastman.

To quantify the scope of the involvement from Trump’s orbit, CNN reviewed online biographies, LinkedIn profiles and news clippings for more than 1,000 people listed on published directories for the 110 organizations on Project 2025’s advisory board, as well as the 200-plus names credited with working on “Mandate for Leadership.”

Overall, CNN found nearly 240 people with ties to both Project 2025 and to Trump, covering nearly every aspect of his time in politics and the White House – from day-to-day foot soldiers in Washington to the highest levels of his government. The number is likely higher because many individuals’ online résumés were not available.

In addition to people who worked directly for Trump, others who participated in Project 2025 were appointed by the former president to independent positions. For instance, Federal Communications Commissioner Brendan Carr authored an entire chapter of proposed changes to his agency, and Lisa Correnti, an anti-abortion advocate Trump appointed as a delegate to the United Nations Commission on the Status of Women, is among the contributors.

Several people involved in Project 2025 didn’t serve in the Trump administration but were influential in shaping his first term. One example is former US Attorney Brett Tolman, a leading force behind the former president’s criminal justice reform law who later helped arrange a pardon for Charles Kushner, the father of Trump’s son-in-law. Tolman is listed as a contributor to “Mandate for Leadership.”

The extensive overlap between Project 2025 and Trump’s universe of allies, advisers and former staff complicates his efforts to distance himself from the work. Trump’s campaign has sought for months to make clear that Project 2025 doesn’t speak for them amid an intensifying push by President Joe Biden and Democrats to tie the Republican standard bearer to the playbook’s more controversial policies.

In a statement to CNN, campaign spokeswoman Danielle Alvarez said Trump only endorses the Republican Party platform and the agenda posted on the former president’s website.

“Team Biden and the (Democratic National Committee) are lying and fear-mongering because they have nothing else to offer the American people,” Alvarez said.

Heritage plan becomes a political headache
Behind Project 2025 is the Heritage Foundation, a 51-year-old conservative organization that aligned itself with Trump not long after his 2016 victory. Heritage is led by Kevin Roberts, a Trump ally whom the former president praised as “doing an unbelievable job” on a February night when they shared the same stage.

Heritage conceived Project 2025 to begin planning so a Republican president could hit the ground running after the election. One of its priorities is creating a roadmap for the first 180 days of the new administration to quickly reorient every federal agency around its conservative vision. Described on its website as “a movement-wide effort guided by the conservative cause to address and reform the failings of big government and an undemocratic administrative state,” Project 2025 also aims to recruit and train thousands of people loyal to the conservative movement to fill federal government positions.

One organization advising Project 2025, American Accountability Foundation, is also putting together a roster of current federal workers it suspects could impede Trump’s plans for a second term. Heritage is paying the group $100,000 for its work.

Many of Project 2025’s priorities are aligned with the former president, especially on immigration and purging the federal bureaucracies. Both Trump and Project 2025 have called for eliminating the Department of Education.

But Project 2025 has lately become a lightning rod for other ideas Trump hasn’t explicitly backed. Within “Mandate for Leadership” are plans to ban pornography, reverse federal approval of the abortion pill mifepristone, exclude the morning-after pill and men’s contraceptives from coverage mandated under the Affordable Care Act, make it harder for transgender adults to transition, and eliminate the federal agency that oversees the National Weather Service.

Its voluminous and detailed plans also run counter to Trump’s desire for a streamlined GOP platform absent any language that Democrats could wield against Republicans this cycle.

Roberts recently faced backlash as well for saying in an interview that the country was “in the process of the second American Revolution, which will remain bloodless if the left allows it to be.”

Three days later, Trump posted to Truth Social: “I know nothing about Project 2025.”

“I disagree with some of the things they’re saying and some of the things they’re saying are absolutely ridiculous and abysmal,” he wrote.

In response to Trump’s social media post, a Project 2025 spokesperson told CNN in a statement it “does not speak for any candidate or campaign.”

“It is ultimately up to that president, who we believe will be President Trump, to decide which recommendations to use,” the spokesperson said.

Trump’s campaign has repeatedly said in recent months that “reports about personnel and policies that are specific to a second Trump Administration are purely speculative and theoretical” and don’t represent the former president’s plans. Project 2025 and similar policy proposals coming from outside Trump’s campaign are “merely suggestions,” campaign managers Susie Wiles and Chris LaCivita wrote in a statement.

Vast network of Trump allies
However, Trump’s attempts to distance himself from Project 2025 have already encountered credibility challenges. The person overseeing Project 2025, Paul Dans, was a top official in Trump’s White House who has previously said he hopes to work for his former boss again. Shortly after Trump’s Truth Social post last week, Democrats noted a recruitment video for Project 2025 features a Trump campaign spokeswoman. On Tuesday, the Biden campaign posted dozens of examples of connections between Trump and Project 2025.

CNN’s review of Project 2025’s contributors also demonstrated the breadth of Trump’s reach through the upper ranks of the vast network of organizations working to move the country in a conservative direction – from women’s groups and Christian colleges to conservative think tanks in Texas, Alabama and Mississippi.

New organizations centered around Trump’s political movement, his conspiracy theories around his electoral defeats and his first-term policies are deeply involved in Project 2025 as well. One of the advisory groups, America First Legal, was started by Miller, a key player in forming Trump’s immigration agenda. Another is the Center for Renewing America, founded by Russ Vought, former acting director of the Office of Management and Budget, who wrote for Project 2025 a detailed blueprint for consolidating executive power.

Vought recently oversaw the Republican Party committee that drafted the new platform heavily influenced by Trump.

In addition to Vought, two other former Trump Cabinet secretaries wrote chapters for “Mandate for Leadership”: Housing and Urban Development Secretary Ben Carson and acting Defense Secretary Christopher Miller. Three more former department heads – National Intelligence Director John Ratcliffe, acting Transportation Secretary Steven Bradbury and acting Labor Secretary Patrick Pizzella – are listed as contributors.

Project 2025’s proposals for reforming the country’s immigration laws appear heavily influenced by those who helped execute Trump’s early enforcement measures. Former acting US Customs and Border Protection chief Mark Morgan and former Immigration and Customs Enforcement chief Tom Homan – the faces of Trump’s polarizing policies – contributed to the project, as did Kathy Nuebel Kovarik, one of the policy advisers pushing to end certain immigrant protections behind the scenes. The Project 2025 chapter on overhauling the Department of Homeland Security was written by Ken Cuccinelli, a top official at the department under Trump.

Some of Trump’s most contentious and high-profile hires are credited with working on “Mandate for Leadership,” including some whose tenures ended under a cloud of controversy.

Before Trump adviser Peter Navarro went to prison for refusing to comply with a congressional subpoena as part of the House investigation into the January 6, 2021, US Capitol attack, he wrote a section defending the former president’s trade policies and advocating for punitive tariffs.

Other contributors include: Michael Pack, a conservative filmmaker who orchestrated a mass firing at the US Agency for Global Media after he was installed by Trump; Frank Wuco, a senior White House adviser who once promoted far-right conspiracies on his talk radio show, including lies about President Barack Obama’s citizenship; former NOAA official David Legates, a notable climate change skeptic investigated for posting dubious research with the White House imprint; and Mari Stull, a wine blogger-turned-lobbyist who left the Trump administration amid accusations she was hunting for disloyal State Department employees.

The culmination of their work, spread across 900 pages, touches every corner of the executive branch and would drastically change the federal government as well as everyday life for many Americans. In summarizing the undertaking, Roberts wrote in “Mandate for Leadership” that Project 2025 represented “the next conservative President’s last opportunity to save our republic.”

“Conservatives have just two years and one shot to get this right,” Roberts said. “With enemies at home and abroad, there is no margin for error. Time is running short. If we fail, the fight for the very idea of America may be lost.”

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 70,208
Likes: 1443
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 70,208
Likes: 1443


Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,363
Likes: 131
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 15,363
Likes: 131
Originally Posted by BADdog
"What is Project 2025?" The Republican bible


trump says he doesn’t know, but he’s selling it.


"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." Thomas Jefferson.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 32,901
Likes: 684
O
Legend
Offline
Legend
O
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 32,901
Likes: 684
Trump acting like he has no idea what project 2025 is, is just priceless. This clown show thinks they can jam their vision of an American Taliban regime down our throats while we’re not looking. Everytime Trump gets caught he projects his bad deeds upon others. All you have to do is listen to know who and what they are, they tell us every day.


GM Strong!

Go Browns! Win it all!
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,773
Likes: 109
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,773
Likes: 109
Originally Posted by OldColdDawg
Trump acting like he has no idea what project 2025 is, is just priceless. This clown show thinks they can jam their vision of an American Taliban regime down our throats while we’re not looking. Everytime Trump gets caught he projects his bad deeds upon others. All you have to do is listen to know who and what they are, they tell us every day.

No thats not what he meant, No he didnt say that, It was a joke. You democrats let killers across the boarder thats the real issue... rolleyes



Joe Thomas #73
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,328
Likes: 226
Hall of Famer
Online
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,328
Likes: 226


Don't blame the clown for acting like a clown.
Ask yourself why you keep going to the circus.
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,027
Likes: 70
N
Hall of Famer
OP Online
Hall of Famer
N
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,027
Likes: 70
https://www.yahoo.com/news/hidden-camera-video-shows-project-141328967.html


Hidden-camera video shows Project 2025 co-author discussing his secret work preparing for a second Trump term
Curt Devine, Casey Tolan, Audrey Ash and Kyung Lah, CNN
Thu, August 15, 2024 at 10:56 AM EDT·12 min read
1.1k


Hidden-camera video shows Project 2025 co-author discussing his secret work preparing for a second Trump term
Last month, Russell Vought sat in a five-star Washington, DC, hotel suite, bowing his head in prayer with two men he thought were relatives of a wealthy conservative donor.

Vought, one of the key authors of Project 2025, a right-wing blueprint for a second Trump term, expected the meeting would help his think tank secure a substantial contribution. For nearly two hours, he talked candidly about his behind-the-scenes work to prepare policy for former President Donald Trump, his expansive views on presidential power, his plans to restrict pornography and immigration, and his complaints that the GOP was too focused on “religious liberty” instead of “Christian nation-ism.”

But the men Vought was talking to actually worked for a British journalism nonprofit and were secretly recording him the entire time.

The nonprofit, the Centre for Climate Reporting, published a video of the meeting on Thursday – offering a window into the thinking of one of the top policy minds of the MAGA movement, who’s been floated as a possible White House chief of staff.

Trump has publicly rejected Project 2025 as Vice President Kamala Harris’ campaign has sought to tie him to some of the plan’s most extreme proposals. But in private, Vought said that those disavowals were merely “graduate-level politics.”

Vought said his group, the Center for Renewing America, was secretly drafting hundreds of executive orders, regulations, and memos that would lay the groundwork for rapid action on Trump’s plans if he wins, describing his work as creating “shadow” agencies. He claimed that Trump has “blessed” his organization and “he’s very supportive of what we do.”

“Eighty percent of my time is working on the plans of what’s necessary to take control of these bureaucracies,” Vought said. “And we are working doggedly on that, whether it’s destroying their agencies’ notion of independence … whether that is thinking through how the deportation would work.”

In discussing Trump’s plan to carry out the largest deportation in US history – which the former president has called for publicly – Vought said the expulsion of millions of undocumented immigrants could help “save the country.”

Once deportations begin, “you’re really going to be winning a debate along the way about what that looks like,” Vought said. “And so that’s going to cause us to get us off of multiculturalism, just to be able to sustain and defend the deportation, right?”

The video is the latest example of secret recordings exposing political figures’ private comments. The tactics used by the Centre – which created fake websites and a fake LinkedIn profile to deceive Vought – are typically rejected by mainstream American news outlets.

But using hidden cameras and deceptive practices in reporting is more common in the UK, where the Centre is based, and it’s been on the rise on the fringe of the US media as well. The conservative group Project Veritas has long conducted sting operations and published selectively edited videos, and earlier this year, a liberal activist released audio recordings of conversations she had with Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito and his wife, as well as Chief Justice John Roberts.

In an email, Lawrence Carter, the Centre’s co-founder and director, defended the group’s tactics, saying that there was a public interest in revealing Vought’s private comments about his relationship with Trump and work on Project 2025.

“We broadly follow the UK’s press regulator guidelines on this, which say that it is justified if it is in the public interest and not obtainable via other means,” Carter said. “We therefore weigh the subject’s reasonable expectation of privacy with the public interest.”

The Centre posted clips of its secretly recorded conversation with Vought online. It provided CNN what it said was a complete, unedited version of its video on the condition that CNN blurred footage showing its employees’ faces, in order to protect their ability to go undercover in the future.

In a statement Thursday, Vought’s nonprofit downplayed the video, saying it did not reveal any new comments from him.

“It would have been easier to just do a google search to ‘uncover’ what is already on our website and said in countless national media interviews,” said Rachel Cauley, a spokesperson for the Center for Renewing America. “But thank you for airing our perfect conversation emphasizing our policy work is totally separate from the Trump campaign, as we have been saying.”

A Trump spokesperson declined to comment on the video, but his campaign has stressed that he sets his own agenda and that Project 2025 and other outside conservative groups don’t speak for him.

“President Trump’s campaign made it clear that only President Trump and the campaign, and NOT any other organization or former staff, represent policies for the second term,” Danielle Alvarez, a senior advisor to the campaign, said in a statement. “President Trump personally led the effort to establish 20 promises made to the forgotten men and women across our nation, as well as RNC Platform – these are the only policies endorsed by President Trump for a second term.”

An elaborate ruse
Vought served as the director of the Office of Management and Budget under Trump, where he made a name for himself as a policy wonk committed to the MAGA movement. In public, Trump repeatedly praised Vought for doing an “incredible” and “fantastic” job at OMB.

After Trump left office, Vought started the Center for Renewing America, a nonprofit that describes itself as the “tip of the America First spear.” CRA was one of many right-leaning groups that partnered on Project 2025, a more than 900-page blueprint for Trump’s second term that was led by the Heritage Foundation. Vought personally authored the project’s chapter on the executive office of the president, and his group contributed to several other chapters of the plan as well.

Vought also served as the policy director of the Republican National Convention committee that rewrote the GOP’s official platform this year – a sign of how central he is to Republicans’ policy goals.

Last month, Vought’s team was approached by employees with the Centre for Climate Reporting, which has previously published investigations into climate negotiations and Saudi Arabia’s energy policy.

The Centre spun an elaborate fiction, with a journalist and a paid actor posing as the brother and son-in-law of a reclusive New Mexico investor. The nonexistent patriarch had watched Vought’s appearances on Steve Bannon’s “War Room” show while recuperating from an illness – and wanted to make a seven-figure contribution to CRA after previously focusing his philanthropy on classical music, they claimed.

The meeting took place on July 24, the week after the Republican convention, at the presidential suite of the Rosewood hotel in DC, where the Centre had placed several hidden cameras and microphones, Carter said. After the Centre’s employees suggested starting the meeting with a prayer, they peppered Vought with questions about his work and views, the video shows.

Sitting on a couch in the hotel suite, Vought seemed relaxed and comfortable discussing a wide range of topics, from the history of the conservative movement to European politics to his relationship with the former president.

Vought said he was unfazed by Trump’s repeated denials of any connection with Project 2025, dismissing such public statements as politics.

“I see what he’s doing is just very, very conscious distancing himself from a brand,” Vought said. “It’s interesting, he’s in fact not even opposing himself to a particular policy.”

About a week after the conversation, the director of Project 2025 stepped down, and Trump’s campaign managers said in a statement that “reports of Project 2025’s demise would be greatly welcomed.”

Vought said he had personally talked to Trump in recent months and received at least one personal “assignment” from him after he left office. He noted that the former president has “been at our organization, he’s raised money for our organization, he’s blessed it … he’s very supportive of what we do.”

That wasn’t just bluster to try to land a big check, according to others in the MAGA movement. Trump and Vought have spoken at various times since leaving office, and the former president has adopted some of Vought’s ideas, two sources familiar with their relationship told CNN.

President Donald Trump listens as acting director of the Office of Management and Budget Russell Vought speaks during a White House event in October 2019. - Evan Vucci/AP
President Donald Trump listens as acting director of the Office of Management and Budget Russell Vought speaks during a White House event in October 2019. - Evan Vucci/AP
Inside the ‘second phase’ of Project 2025
In preparation for Trump’s potential return to the White House, Vought said in the meeting that he had a team of staffers working to draft regulations and executive orders that would translate Trump’s campaign speeches into government policy.

“We’ve got about 350 different documents that are regulations and things of that nature that are, we’re planning for the next administration,” he said.

For example, “you may say, ‘OK, all right, DHS, we want to have the largest deportation,’” Vought said. “What are your actual memos that a secretary sends out to do it? Like, there’s an executive order, regulations, secretarial memos. Those are the types of things that need to be thought through so you’re not, you’re not having to scramble or do that later on.”

Those plans will not be made public, Vought said, but instead will be “very, very close hold.”

A Centre for Climate Reporting journalist, under the guise of the fake donor’s relative, also secretly recorded a separate conversation with one of Vought’s aides, who went into more detail about the process. Micah Meadowcroft, the research director for CRA, said the drafts the group was preparing would be provided to an incoming Trump administration in a way that would protect them from ever being publicly disclosed.

“It’s a big, fat stack of papers that will be distributed during the transition period,” Meadowcroft said in the video – while noting that “you don’t actually, like, send them to their work emails,” in order to avoid disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act.

He described Vought’s work preparing executive orders and policy playbooks as “the second phase” of Project 2025.

The work of drafting policies is happening months ahead of the election in part because “President Trump will want to spend literally zero amount of time thinking or contemplating what a transition will look like,” Vought said. “It’s not how he thinks.”

Vought’s guiding principle, he said, was simple: What would Donald do?

“We were always going off of, if Donald Trump was head of this agency, what would he do with it?” Vought said.

The Washington Post and Associated Press previously reported that Vought was drafting a playbook for the first 180 days of a new Trump administration.

More broadly, during Trump’s first term in office, Vought said, “we had people, appointees, that were not on board with the president’s viewpoint – leaking, destabilizing the policy process.”

“I don’t think that will be the occurrence again,” Vought said. “I think he will find people that share his political views are bought in, and that will be a much more healthy White House process as a result.”

Some have speculated that Vought himself could be one of those people, with others in the MAGA movement floating him as a potential White House chief of staff. Asked if he had been offered a job in a second Trump administration, Vought said no, but added, “I think there’s an expectation that I would go in.”

“I don’t know what that would be,” he said. “I don’t know what the President would want me to do.”

Religion and race
Elsewhere in the conversation, Vought outlined views on religion and race that seem more extreme than those Trump has publicly articulated – including criticism of the right for what he described as an excessive focus on religious freedom.

In the conservative movement, “we’ve been too focused on religious liberty, which we all support, but we’ve lacked the ability to argue we are a Christian nation,” Vought argued – an idea he’s also talked about publicly. “Our laws are built on the Judeo-Christian worldview value system.”

He said that conservatives should push to have debates over whether to allow mosques to be built in America’s downtowns, and whether Christian immigrants should be prioritized over those of other faiths – ideas that run contrary to First Amendment protections.

“I want to make sure that we can say we are a Christian nation,” Vought added later. “And my viewpoint is mostly that I would probably be Christian nation-ism. That’s pretty close to Christian nationalism because I also believe in nationalism.”

Vought argued that it was important to pursue some of the culturally conservative policy goals listed in the Project 2025 blueprint – including abortion restrictions and making pornography illegal – while taking into account political realities.

Instead of an unpopular new law banning all pornography, for example, Vought said that his group would propose “doing it from the back door” by making pornography websites legally liable if minors use them. That could lead pornography companies to stop doing business in states with those kind of laws, he suggested.

And in discussing the protests and riots around the US in the wake of the murder of George Floyd in 2020, Vought said that the president had the ability to use the military to restore order. He argued that the commander-in-chief wasn’t limited by the Posse Comitatus Act, a nearly 150-year-old law that prevents federal troops from conducting civilian law enforcement except when authorized by law.

“The President has, you know, the ability both along the border and elsewhere to maintain law and order with the military,” Vought said. “And that’s something that, you know, it’s going to be important for, for him to remember and his lawyers to affirm.”

Trump wanted to deploy thousands of active duty troops on the streets of major cities to quell protesters in 2020, but defense officials pushed back, a senior official told CNN at the time.

Vought added that the unrest following Floyd’s death “obviously was not about race.”

“It was about destabilizing the Trump administration,” he claimed.

For more CNN news and newsletters create an account at CNN.com

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 70,208
Likes: 1443
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 70,208
Likes: 1443
Watch: 14 Hours of Never-Before-Published Videos From Project 2025’s Presidential Administration Academy

https://www.propublica.org/article/video-project-2025-presidential-training-academy-trump-election


Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,773
Likes: 109
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,773
Likes: 109
Can you give us the Cliffnotes?



Joe Thomas #73
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 70,208
Likes: 1443
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 70,208
Likes: 1443
I think that everyone should hear what they have to say and reach their own conclusions. The opinions I may draw from what is said may not be the same opinion others draw from it. So no, if people wish to know what they are saying, as it pertains to me, they will have to listen to it for themselves. Taking the word of cliff notes based on the conclusions of others has a lot to do with the mess we find ourselves in now.

Last edited by PitDAWG; 08/15/24 04:23 PM.

Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,027
Likes: 70
N
Hall of Famer
OP Online
Hall of Famer
N
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,027
Likes: 70
Republican Project 2025 Takes Dead Aim at Veterans' Health and Disability Benefits
Facebook
X
Pinterest
Email
Email
Email
Share
exterior of the Veterans Affairs Department hospital is shown in east Denver
In this Oct. 4, 2017 file photo, the exterior of the Veterans Affairs Department hospital is shown in east Denver. (AP Photo/David Zalubowski, File)
Military.com | By Chris Deluzio
Published August 12, 2024 at 9:58am ET

The opinions expressed in this op-ed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Military.com or the official position of the Department of the Army or Department of Defense. If you would like to submit your own commentary, please send your article to opinions@military.com for consideration.

When I came to Congress two years ago and joined the House Veterans' Affairs Committee, I was cautiously optimistic that lawmakers would put aside their differences to serve the needs of veterans. After all, some Republicans had just broken party ranks to support the PACT Act, a cornerstone law pushed by President Joe Biden that expanded health care to millions of fellow toxic-exposed veterans and their survivors.


Sadly, no dice. The past 18 months on the committee have been marked by dysfunction, division, and a slew of damaging policy proposals. House Republicans used the committee not as a space to come together for veterans, but instead as a battlefield for their right-wing culture war. Too often, the committee became a venue to try to privatize veterans' health care. My Republican colleagues sided with corporate interests to outsource care from the Department of Veterans Affairs, despite studies indicating that this fee-for-service care falls woefully short of department standards. Worse still, some even tried to slash funding for the Pact Act and renege on the promise of health care for toxic-exposed veterans of my generation.

As November nears, Republicans are predictably claiming their deep loyalty to veterans. During the first presidential debate, former President Donald Trump claimed, with no evidence, that he had the "highest approval rating for veterans." This year's Republican Party platform is short on details, leaving veteran voters to consider the conservative ticket on little more than platitudes.

There are, however, worrying clues for what may be in store for veterans should Republicans regain full power, in the form of Project 2025, an intricate road map for a second Trump administration. Authored by right-wing strategists from the Heritage Foundation and other groups with close ties to Trump, the sweeping presidential agenda promotes an unprecedented attack on the VA. Millions of my fellow veterans and I earned our VA health care and benefits through service and sacrifice while in uniform. Project 2025's proposed attacks on the VA are a betrayal of the sacred promise this country makes to veterans.

Trump has tried to distance himself from the proposals in Project 2025, claiming not to know about their development and that he disagreed with parts of the plan. That denial never passed the smell test, as 140 of Project 2025's contributors previously worked for him, including the authors of its veterans' recommendations. Make no mistake, these are ideas that will dominate the White House if he wins.

At a Heritage Foundation conference in 2022, as Project 2025 was in preparation, Trump expressed support, stating, "They're going to lay the groundwork and detail plans for exactly what our movement will do."

Come November, freedom-loving voters will remember it was Donald Trump and his party minions who pushed a plan to cut health care for millions of patriotic veterans, while supporting continued massive tax cuts for the rich and giant corporations.

Project 2025 envisions significant reductions to veterans' health care services and disability benefits. Proposed changes could disenroll millions of veterans without a service-connected designation from VA-paid health care. Other veterans could lose access to VA health care for issues that "don't align" with their service-related conditions. Take a look at the desired policies laid out in the Heritage Foundation's related blueprint: It's there in black and white.

Project 2025's plan would also require VA hospitals to "increase the number of patients seen each day to equal the number seen by DoD medical facilities." That directive ignores the enormous differences in needs between generally healthy younger service members and older veterans, and risks compromising the quality of care for veterans. Project 2025 also calls for VA hospitals to outsource more care into costly private facilities, a fiscally reckless move that continues a Trump-backed trend promoted by the Mission Act that has ballooned costs for the VA. Project 2025 also endorses the revival of a scuttled Trump-era commission largely aimed at downsizing and even closing VA hospitals. The ultimate endgame of these plans -- to dismantle the VA's clinical care mission -- should send shivers down the spines of America's veterans and those who want them to have the best care out there.

And it gets even worse. Project 2025 is hell-bent on cutting veterans' hard-earned disability benefits. The agenda calls for cutting costs by revising disability rating awards for future claims and partially revising some existing claims. Let's call this what this is: a proposal to slash care and benefits for disabled veterans, in part or in whole. When asked about these slashed disability payments, a spokesperson for Project 2025 dug in on the possibility of rolling back the ratings scale for those who fight tomorrow's wars. In a Project 2025 world, future generations of disabled veterans could see their benefits cut or wiped out entirely.

We veterans are sick of being used as political props, welcomed in campaign ads and press conferences, but having our needs ignored by politicians more interested in tax giveaways to the rich and powerful. The truth is that, while Trump and Republican politicians continue to wrap themselves in the flag, their anti-veteran record speaks for itself. Veterans and the American public can see that while Democrats have delivered tangible results and expanded care for veterans, Trump's Project 2025 is an existential threat to those who served this great country.

Veterans won't fall for Republican two-faced messages of false patriotism in November.

-- Chris Deluzio, a Democrat, is a Navy and Iraq War veteran representing Pennsylvania's 17th Congressional District.

https://www.military.com/daily-news...d-disability-benefits.html?ICID=ref_fark

Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Palus Politicus What is Project 2025

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5