Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,156
Likes: 1
Dawg Talker
OP Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,156
Likes: 1
What goes around comes around...


Judge temporarily blocks Biden's plan to halt deportations


By Priscilla Alvarez, CNN


January 26, 2021




(CNN)A federal judge in Texas temporarily blocked the Biden administration's pause on deportations Tuesday, delivering a blow to one of the administration's first immigration actions.
The early defeat, even if temporary, demonstrates the limits of President Joe Biden's executive actions, which are expected to be challenged in court.

Analysis: On immigration, Biden seeks a new approach to an old deadlock
Analysis: On immigration, Biden seeks a new approach to an old deadlock
Tuesday's order stems from a lawsuit filed by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton challenging the 100-day pause on deportations, which took effect Friday. The complaint cited in part an agreement signed between the Department of Homeland Security and Texas in the waning days of the Trump presidency that required the department to consult the state before changing or modifying policies.

Judge Drew Tipton of the Southern District of Texas, however, said the temporary restraining order was appropriate under the Administrative Procedure Act. Tipton blocked the Biden administration from executing its deportation pause for 14 days.

READ: Judge's temporary order blocking Biden's halt of deportations
Tipton, appointed by President Donald Trump, also found that Texas could be harmed if the moratorium were to continue. "In light of the foregoing, the Court finds that the threat of injury to Texas outweighs any potential harm to Defendants and the public interest is served and protected by the issuance of this TRO," he wrote.

The moratorium has only been in place for five days.
The White House, Immigration and Customs Enforcement and the Department of Homeland Security did not immediately comment on the ruling.

Paxton applauded the ruling, saying in a statement: "The Court's decision to stop the Biden Administration from casting aside congressionally enacted immigration laws is a much-needed remedy for DHS's unlawful action. A near-complete suspension of deportations would only serve to endanger Texans and undermine federal law."

READ: Judge's temporary order blocking Biden's halt of deportations
READ: Judge's temporary order blocking Biden's halt of deportations
Biden's first days in office have been marked by the release of his ambitious immigration agenda, but the ruling has whiplashed immigration attorneys, who just days earlier were trying to make sense of the new memo.
"In a word: unbelievable. Despite the limited nature of the TRO grant (a two week pause of the pause), the decision is breathtakingly wrong," said Jeremy McKinney, an immigration attorney based in North Carolina and the American Immigration Lawyers Association first vice president.

"There have been so many changes, and so many rules, and there's also Covid-19 and as a way to kind of bring some order into this chaos that the Trump administration had wrought, I think a pause on removals would've been a good policy," said Claudia Cubas, an immigration attorney based in Washington, DC.
The Biden moratorium covers most deportations but excludes individuals who came to the US after November 1, are suspected of terrorism or espionage or pose a danger to national security, have waived rights to remain in the US or who've been determined removable by the acting director, according to an agency memo.

Immediate lawsuit from Texas
Just as swiftly as the new memo took effect, so came a legal challenge from Paxton.

The Republican led an attempt to void Biden's Electoral College victory last month and will be a constant presence in federal court attempting to block the Biden administration's policies on immigration.

During the Trump administration, Paxton also led a lawsuit challenging the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, which shields undocumented immigrants who came to the US as children from deportation. The case is ongoing. He is also at the head of the latest lawsuit at the Supreme Court challenging the Affordable Care Act.

The case over the deportation pause has moved quickly.
On Monday, Tipton asked the Biden administration to clarify its moratorium after Texas submitted a Fox News report to the court that cited an internal email instructing Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials to "release them all, immediately."

The Justice Department submitted the correspondence, which originated in the Houston field office, on Monday afternoon. An official appears to notify the workforce about the moratorium announced the previous day, telling them to "stop all removals" as of midnight, but that email is later followed by another official calling for the directive to be retracted immediately.

"Please direct your supervisors to follow the memorandum issued. Operational guidance is being developed and will be issued in the coming days," the email stated, adding: "Any questions on removals, releases, and/or arrests that we cannot determine fit squarely into the directive will be forwarded up through me to HQ for further discussion and decisions."

The Justice Department also told the court that some undocumented immigrants with removal orders had been released from custody, but as part of separate litigation relating to Covid-19. DHS has discretion in who it releases, the Justice Department added.

"There are going to be times that the Department of Homeland Security uses its discretion in manners that Texas disagrees... Texas has different views about immigration policy than the current administration," said DOJ attorney Adam Kirschner.

https://www.cnn.com/2021/01/26/politics/deportation-biden/index.html

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,156
Likes: 1
Dawg Talker
OP Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,156
Likes: 1

January 27, 2021


Federal judge suspends Biden’s deportation freeze nationwide

By Thomas Lifson

All of a sudden, Democrats are discovering a downside to federal district court judges issuing nationwide injunctions blocking presidential initiatives. What goes around comes around.

CNN ruefully reports:

A federal judge in Texas temporarily blocked the Biden administration's pause on deportations Tuesday, delivering a blow to one of the administration's first immigration actions.

The early defeat, even if temporary, demonstrates the limits of President Joe Biden's executive actions, which are expected to be challenged in court.

Tuesday's order stems from a lawsuit filed by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton challenging the 100-day pause on deportations, which took effect Friday. The complaint cited in part an agreement signed between the Department of Homeland Security and Texas in the waning days of the Trump presidency that required the department to consult the state before changing or modifying policies.

Judge Drew Tipton of the Southern District of Texas, however, said the temporary restraining order was appropriate under the Administrative Procedure Act. Tipton blocked the Biden administration from executing its deportation pause for 14 days.

Tipton, appointed by President Donald Trump, also found that Texas could be harmed if the moratorium were to continue. "In light of the foregoing, the Court finds that the threat of injury to Texas outweighs any potential harm to Defendants and the public interest is served and protected by the issuance of this TRO," he wrote.


Texas AG Ken Paxton.
Photo credit: Alice Linahan Voices Empower CC BY-SA 2.0 license.

I consider this injunction the first installment in payback for the many nationwide injunctions issued by district court judges against President Trump's initiatives. The very same formula that Democrats exploited can be used. Find a plaintiff located somewhere where a sympathetic federal judge can be found, allege harm, and ask for an injunction.

In this case, the Texas A.G. brought suit and found a Trump appointee who bought the argument enough to issue a temporary injunction. Now comes the part about delaying proceedings while Biden, or whoever is doing his thinking for him, fumes.

Retaliation is the only argument that ever would persuade Democrats to drop their obnoxious tactics. They are in for a heaping helping of injunctions against Biden's moves.


https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/202...nationwide.html

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 74,446
Likes: 1656
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 74,446
Likes: 1656
Speaking of Texas, they are 1-1 in the SCOTUS. They did win this one but lost their restrictions limiting abortions the SCOTUS.


Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,156
Likes: 1
Dawg Talker
OP Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,156
Likes: 1

Home | Politics

Biden Ban on Oil, Gas Leasing on US Lands Challenged in Court


Wednesday, 27 January 2021

The Biden administration’s moratorium of oil and gas leasing on federal public land faced an immediate legal attack from an energy industry group.

Western Energy Alliance, which says it represents 200 oil and natural gas companies, said the administration’s suspension of leases is “unsupported and unnecessary,” and an overreach by the U.S. Bureau of Land Management, according to a petition filed Wednesday in Wyoming federal court.

“Presidents don’t have authority to ban leasing on public lands,” Western Energy Alliance President Kathleen Sgamma said in a statement. “Drying up new leasing puts future development as well as existing projects at risk,” she said, adding that the move will cost tens of thousands and perhaps millions of jobs.

The administration moratorium issued Wednesday buys time for a broad review of whether fossil fuels should be extracted from lands under the U.S. government’s control.

Environmentalists want President Joe Biden to make the suspension of leasing permanent. But even if he doesn’t, future leasing could encompass far less terrain and come with higher costs and environmental limits.

Although Biden has directed the Interior Department to pause new leases for oil and natural gas from public land and coastal waters, it will not affect ongoing operations on existing leases. And drilling permits for existing leases will keep flowing; more than two dozen have been issued already since Biden took office.

Beyond its two-page court petition, Western Energy Alliance said in its statement that the president’s order is a violation of the Mineral Leasing Act, the National Environmental Policy Act and the Federal Lands Policy and Management Act.

The group successfully challenged former President Barack Obama’s rule governing gas venting and flaring on federal land and also tangled with the Obama administration over fracking restrictions on public lands.

Wednesday’s suspension drew sharp criticism from other energy industry lobbyists, including the New Mexico Oil and Gas Association, which said one third of the state’s revenue comes from the oil and gas industry.

“This is a punch in the gut to our people and our economy,” Jim Wilcox, president of the Wyoming County Commissioners Association, said in a statement.

The case is Western Energy Alliance v. Biden, 21-cv-00013, U.S. District Court, District of Wyoming.


https://www.newsmax.com/politics/biden-b.../27/id/1007519/

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 15,979
Likes: 83
T
Legend
Offline
Legend
T
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 15,979
Likes: 83
#3, I wonder how article #3 effects the economy.

Well, an overreach by the US bureau of land management, well, well.

In Wyoming no doubt.
Those end well. thumbsdown

(represents 200 oil and natural gas companies? That seems like a lot.

DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Palus Politicus Judge Temporarily Blocks Biden's Plan to Halt Deportations

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5