Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#177269 10/08/07 11:22 PM
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 184
D
DG Offline OP
Practice Squad
OP Offline
Practice Squad
D
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 184
I think that Lewis was a very important part of our improvement but who thinks we are using him to our best advantage? We were supposed to have a more athletic quick Oline that would be able to move downfield and allow Lewis to cut back by clearing the LBs. The Cinn game showed he is still faster that the DBs and able to run 30 times.

I think that without running at least 20 times we are not going to get the benefits from a dominate runner. We also should be throwing more to our RB to allow more isolation against the DBs. I clearly remember Balt beating us almost every time with runs by Lewis. This has to be better than allowing Anderson to throw 40 times.

Lewis is avaerging less than 20 carries a game 77 carries 382 yards 2 TDs...removing his last game we are still not using him enough to take pressure off of Anderson. Lewis is averaging 5 yards a carry and is still healthy. I am not saying wear him out but he should get more than 15-20 carries a game and especially more pass receptions.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,943
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,943
As long as we don't get behind in the score then he will get his carries.

Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 184
D
DG Offline OP
Practice Squad
OP Offline
Practice Squad
D
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 184
We always get behind...why not use half of our offense? I think that Lewis adds just what we had been wanting...a runner that can really make a difference, break away and get tough yards. There aren't many who have the combination of strength, speed and size. He also makes a good reciever and that will reduce injuries and get him out against DBs that will have trouble catching him.

I think this is just like Winslow when we first singed him we used him like a basic TE and took him out on 3rd down...when Winslow is just as good as any reciever. Now we can do the same with Lewis since he can be used for screens, short out passes and as a reciever out of the back field. Maybe we are still working into the plays but I see this offense as much more powerful and capable of really racking up points.

Joined: May 2007
Posts: 164
C
2nd String
Offline
2nd String
C
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 164
Quote:

I think that Lewis was a very important part of our improvement but who thinks we are using him to our best advantage? We were supposed to have a more athletic quick Oline that would be able to move downfield and allow Lewis to cut back by clearing the LBs. The Cinn game showed he is still faster that the DBs and able to run 30 times.

I think that without running at least 20 times we are not going to get the benefits from a dominate runner. We also should be throwing more to our RB to allow more isolation against the DBs. I clearly remember Balt beating us almost every time with runs by Lewis. This has to be better than allowing Anderson to throw 40 times.

Lewis is avaerging less than 20 carries a game 77 carries 382 yards 2 TDs...removing his last game we are still not using him enough to take pressure off of Anderson. Lewis is averaging 5 yards a carry and is still healthy. I am not saying wear him out but he should get more than 15-20 carries a game and especially more pass receptions.





Lewis is a solid RB and I think he should be somewhere around 20-25 carries a game but when playing from behind your pretty much forced to abandon the run. Plus with what Edwards has been doing and Winslow you also need to feed them and give them there numbers so everyone is happy. We actually have some weapons on the offense and are using them to there strengths and most of that is a result Chud's Scheme, so I will not complain about something that I have been pleasently surprised with this season, our WR are catching a majority of the balls thrown to them which is HUGE for us. Lets complain about Defense mostly cuz Offensively we are pretty tough for any team.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 13,281
Likes: 344
L
Legend
Offline
Legend
L
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 13,281
Likes: 344
Stats slightly skewed because of what happened in the Pittsburgh disaster.
In a way it's good, though, because it'll help keep him fresher for when the cold weather hits, when we'll need to start playing more smashmouth.


[Linked Image from i28.photobucket.com]

gmstrong

-----------------

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,950
C
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
C
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,950
I think thats the plan, but when your hurt in the first half of one game and two others your playing from behind, sometmies it just dont happen.

when Healthy Lewis will get the rock, and as the winter sets in he will get it...

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 28,158
Likes: 841
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 28,158
Likes: 841
Quote:

Stats slightly skewed because of what happened in the Pittsburgh disaster.





Ding! Ding! Ding!

Week 1: We were getting blown out from the start, only 11 carries
Week 2: Total shootout, we spent a good amount of time, especially at the end with the lead... result is 27 carries
Week 3: Playing from behind much of the game again: 15 carries
Week 4: We're playing with the lead again and burning the clock: 23 carries

It's not rocket surgery


Browns is the Browns

... there goes Joe Thomas, the best there ever was in this game.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,845
Likes: 159
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,845
Likes: 159
Quote:

It's not rocket surgery




Or Brain Science!



#GMSTRONG

“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.”
Daniel Patrick Moynahan

"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe."
Damanshot
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 8,427
Likes: 84
T
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
T
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 8,427
Likes: 84
Well, if Lewis is healthy look for us to give him the rock quite frequently, but we have to ease him into it.

I don't know the extent of his ankle inhury, but he was on the sidelines walking around and suited up last game after it happened, so I think he is good to go.

I look for him to have a big rebound game, he'll stay tough, fighting through injury and go for over 100.

That will be the Jamal we come to love, he will get it done in any situation.


Find what you love and let it kill you.

-Charles Bukowski
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 832
M
All Pro
Offline
All Pro
M
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 832
This is eerily reminiscent of the "We have to give William Green 25 carries per game" threads.

Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 184
D
DG Offline OP
Practice Squad
OP Offline
Practice Squad
D
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 184
This is the back we all wanted not Green not Rhett or Suggs or Droughns but a true NFL play maker that can get yards and TDs. We can't let Anderson make more that 25-30 throws a game or we get interceptions. We do need variety but we also need a dependable RB behind our much improved Oline. I think we all have a QB save us philosophy that is not going to work here. We don't have a great QB but we do have a great runner so I say use him.

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 832
M
All Pro
Offline
All Pro
M
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 832
Which leads us too...
This is eerily reminiscent of the "We finally have a proven 1,000 yard back in Droughns. He is the best back we have had since 1999. We have to get Droughns more involved" threads.

I am all for running the ball. Lewis is not the same back he was 4 years ago. He is still solid. He is an upgrade over Droughns. Lewis may go for 1,100 or 1,200 yards this year... just like Droughns did 2 years ago - behind a significantly less potent o-line.

This may be the San Diego offense. But, Lewis is not LT.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,845
Likes: 159
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,845
Likes: 159
DG, I'm not exactly sure what you want them to do here.. I mean besides giving the ball to Lewis more. Which, if you took a poll, most would agree with .

When your playing from behind all the time, you gotta throw more.. and then on Sunday, Lewis got hurt,,,

So again, while I agree and want to see Lewis get more carries, I'm not sure what RAC could have done about it.


#GMSTRONG

“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.”
Daniel Patrick Moynahan

"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe."
Damanshot
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 184
D
DG Offline OP
Practice Squad
OP Offline
Practice Squad
D
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 184
If he is hurt that is not the issue. We now should have much more offensive balance and this is a chance to take pressure off of our QB who is not great or barely good. I expected more opportunity for Lewis to run and catch the ball and start making the defense make schemes to stop him...then we can turn to our other weapons but it seems we have neglected a major part of our offense.

Playing from behind should not really affect the play calling until you get desperate. We have not really been desperate except for the first game. When you have the ball down close and a power back like Lewis you should use him. With 5 yards a carry we have to get him the ball.

Last edited by DG; 10/10/07 10:02 PM.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,845
Likes: 159
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 42,845
Likes: 159
I'm really trying to understand your point.. If I have it right,, you want lewis to get more carries, and I don't think you will get anyone to disagree with you..

But again, how was that to be accomplished when we were behind so much of the time.. You say it shouldn't matter until we get disparate,,, I say, playing from behind when you don't KNOW for sure you Offense can come back makes a team Desparate.


#GMSTRONG

“Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.”
Daniel Patrick Moynahan

"Alternative facts hurt us all. Think before you blindly believe."
Damanshot
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 184
D
DG Offline OP
Practice Squad
OP Offline
Practice Squad
D
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 184
I think this year is clearly different. We just ran away from Cinn and didn't let Balt into the game. FIrst half mistakes hurt us against Oak but we still came back and should have won. The only game where we were really behind was Pitt and there we were just not doing anything right. Desperation was our game plan.

Look at the rest of the year and you will see a team that can score and control the ball and make long drives. We were not able to do before. I am saying lets have more of that and more Lewis Please. He can be a major part of our winning since we can control the ball and help our weak defense.

Look at the best teams they have a very good Oline and fast runner that can help the QB...Pitt, Cinn, COlts and Seattle all have a good QB/RB combination with assorted WR help. Now we can get to that level if we use Lewis more and Anderson less.

Last edited by DG; 10/11/07 09:46 PM.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 134
D
Practice Squad
Offline
Practice Squad
D
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 134
If our defense steps up and stops the opponent from scoring, I would imagine our run game would be a big factor. But like everyone is saying when we are behind we have to pass....unless we are behind by a field goal or single TD.

lol i remember last year when everyone complained why we were running when we were loosing on 3rd and 20.


Notre Dame Hater since 1989
[Linked Image from img170.imageshack.us]
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,530
Likes: 3
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,530
Likes: 3
You can always go on with the what if thing , and the truth is, at this point in time it is impossible to say that any of the Browns play makers aren't being used properly. Teams have lined up and dared DA to beat them by stacking the box, that is a fact. To that end DA has done some very good things and some pretty bad things. The important thing here tho is that we have done pretty darned good against some pretty good defences so to say that anybody including JL isn't being used properly is not very sound reasoning IMHO. After all is said and done we are talking about a team that was ranked near or at the bottom of every single offensive catagory last season, and now they are ranked in the top ten. The idea that the play makers aren't being used to the best of their ability isn't and wasn't a very sound argument IMHO...


BTTB

AKA Upbeat Dawg

Can't believe I am in a group that is comprised of the best NOT just fans but people on the planet.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 502
B
All Pro
Offline
All Pro
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 502
Lewis does not ever belong in the same sentance as the bum you mentioned.. That guy was one of the worst draft picks and players in the history of the Cleveland Browns...

This thread title and points have merrit... So do some of the opposing views...

When JL is healthy he has proven to be one of the most productive RB's in the NFL... He does it all very, very, well...Without question...

Teams that don't have a RB like JL and that don't run the ball well consistantly don't win consistantly. The Browns will have to run the ball productively and consistantly. We have very young and inexperienced QB's. They make mistakes and turn the ball over. The Browns have a young, below average D with underachieving. past their prime veterans... The Browns need to control and eat the clock... To do that, the running game has to be successful and productive... The Browns best opportunity to perform theses tasks in to give the ball to JL...

The Browns need balance on 0... They need to continue to attack and get the ball to the playmakers... JL is one of the Browns best, most productive playmakers. IMO JL needs the the ball more... The more JL runs it, the longer the D is off the field... The more JL runs it it, the better it is for the Browns overall. My hope is that JL can get and stay healthy... If not it very well could be aonther very long and frustrating, losing season.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
Likes: 136
E
Legend
Offline
Legend
E
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
Likes: 136
Just n FYI....we never drafted Rueben Droughns the RB referenced by Merth. We traded Mark Meyers and Ebeneezer for him.

JMHRecollection


Defense wins championships. Watson play your butt off!
Go Browns!
CHRIST HAS RISEN!

GM Strong! & Stay safe everyone!
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,718
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,718
Methinks he be thinkin' of Willie Green....

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
Likes: 136
E
Legend
Offline
Legend
E
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 17,475
Likes: 136
I surmized that as well considering Boise despised him from day one...lol


Defense wins championships. Watson play your butt off!
Go Browns!
CHRIST HAS RISEN!

GM Strong! & Stay safe everyone!
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 502
B
All Pro
Offline
All Pro
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 502
Me thinks your thinking is in the cross hairs again...

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 502
B
All Pro
Offline
All Pro
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 502
Your are correct too.

Don't understand the RD qualification though...? I'm well aware of how & why the Browns acquired RD... No worries...

DawgTalkers.net Forums DawgTalk Pure Football Forum Lewis Needs More Carries

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5