What you are missing is that you have always said the federal government has no business in interfering is state and local government. Until now of course. And it wasn't a violent protest in D.C. when they used violence to disperse a crowd so Trump could get a photo op using a Bible in front of a church. And from you? Not a peep. And now you're so concerned with Canada? mmmmm hmmmmm.....
And states could have controlled it. It was an ultimatum from Trump.
The answer my friend, is pit is twisting in the wind. The answer is pit is twisting in the wind.
I'm not concerned with canada.
Federal gov't. does not need to interfere in state and local gov't. The problem is, you twist and turn more than one can imagine.
You got 1 violent protest in DC? Did you want the military there? Trump simply said, for about the 50th time, IF cities and states can't or won't protect..........he will send in the military. Period. Peaceful protests? No issue. Burning and looting and the cities can't control it? Military to help.
I would guess if people were assailing your home or apartment, and your city or stated wouldn't intervene, you would want someone to intervene, right?
Day after day you continually amaze me with your 2 facedness and bias. You do you.
Oh, and keep that sig. Makes you look like a fool, but you're good at that.
