Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 12,833
Likes: 711
O
Legend
Offline
Legend
O
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 12,833
Likes: 711
Originally Posted by leadtheway
Originally Posted by oobernoober
Tyrod didn't work out because Baker (as a rookie) significantly outplayed him. After the Jets game, there was no looking back (for Tyrod).

Other than that, I think your post is spot on.


Even though QB is our main issue, we need to invest more into Oline and RB (and probably WR) if our next QB investment is coming from the draft.
Lol yeah that too, but I was more referring to Tyrod wasn't coming here to be a bridge, he was coming here to start, when he got hurt that was it, baker came in and broke the rookie TD record in 13 games. no turning back at that point. I agree, I think without an oline and legit running game, no QB is going to come in and do well. I think one thing to find out is, is it the personnel or the coaching, because this is basically the exact same line that was destroying defenses under callahan, now all of sudden they've gone away from ZBS and have whatever this atrocity that dickerson is coaching. I'm secretly hoping callahan's son is 1 and done in TN, dude is way out of his depth there. Then we can lure Bill back and fix this.

Please correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought the oline had actually been trending down over the past 2-3 seasons. To your point, they looked like they had fallen off a cliff this year, but I was ready to chalk that up to the tackle situation and us not overall investing enough to keep the line performing at that #1 level.


There is no level of sucking we haven't seen; in fact, I'm pretty sure we hold the patents on a few levels of sucking NOBODY had seen until the past few years.

-PrplPplEater
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,905
Likes: 254
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,905
Likes: 254
I stand by my statement...

Stefanski can make any QB look amazing... minus Watson.


Blocking those who argue to argue, eliminates the argument.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 33,527
Likes: 709
O
OCD Offline
Legend
Offline
Legend
O
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 33,527
Likes: 709
This game our players really left it all on the field. Ski is safe for sure.

OCD #2095320 12/04/24 05:09 PM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,170
Likes: 206
H
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
H
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,170
Likes: 206
Originally Posted by OCD
This game our players really left it all on the field. Ski is safe for sure.


And he should be. We outplayed a good team at their house that we never beat. We shredded what everyone said was a very good D that was improving. We lost this game obviously because of TO's. We beat ourselves.

1 member likes this: bonefish
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,853
Likes: 127
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,853
Likes: 127
Originally Posted by lampdogg
Originally Posted by Homewood Dog
I understand about Darnold but keeping JW would be a seamless move. He knows the system his teammates and he’s respected here. Sounds like a no brainer to me.

Even if he leaves Minnesota and he might, could we afford him without gutting the roster?

Hard to believe we are talking about Darnold. He sucked when he was in NY



Joe Thomas #73
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,532
Likes: 192
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,532
Likes: 192
Some QB’s take longer to develop. Darnold had all the tools in college, and was right there with Baker and Josh.

NY chewed him up.

It happened to Geno Smith as well… Geno is a respectable QB these days.


"Jameis Winston: guaranteed to throw 6 TD's/game. Tune in next week to see which team benefits-"
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,167
Likes: 910
B
Legend
Offline
Legend
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,167
Likes: 910
Originally Posted by PitDAWG
That's the exact same thing many of us were saying about Flacco last year. Hopefully this FO will wake up after that huge mistake. They didn't even make him an offer to keep him here and he helped lead the Browns to the playoffs. I'm not so sure I have the confidence in this group not to make the same mistake yet again.

Last year presented strange circumstances. At the time I don't think anybody with decision power was ready to move on from Watson. Bringing Flacco back would have created a QB controversy. That was the last thing they wanted. I get why they made the decision. I would have done the same.


If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.

GM Strong




[Linked Image]
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 15,002
Likes: 1069
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 15,002
Likes: 1069
Originally Posted by Homewood Dog
Originally Posted by OCD
This game our players really left it all on the field. Ski is safe for sure.


And he should be. We outplayed a good team at their house that we never beat. We shredded what everyone said was a very good D that was improving. We beat ourselves.

No argument here, at all.

Quote
We lost this game obviously because of TO's.

I just finished writing a txt response to my best bro (who isn't a member of this site).

He wrote:
Quote
Quote of the day: Jameius Winston is the ultimate game manger. He keeps both teams in the game."

My response:

Quote
"Jameis Winston: guaranteed to throw 6 TD's/game. Tune in next week to see which team benefits-"

Live by the JW/die by the JW.

I'll say this much: 'life with JW' is providing much more entertaining Browns football than 'life with DW' ever was. I'm a basic football fan more than I am an amateur GM... so I rarely engage with the draft-talkers on Dawgtalkers. I care about one thing: "Do the Cleveland Browns play this Sunday in a way that makes me want to watch them next Sunday?" Yes... I'm pretty much that basic.

______________

The games that have been QB'd by JW are far more fun to watch than that dreck CLE was trotting out, 1st half of the season.
Monday Night Football felt a LOT like last year: anything could/can happen, Browns are holding their own against a statistically superior team... and Elves are still relevant, with 2:00 left in Q4.


I don't give a rat's back end about the draft. We pay professionals to sweat that stuff. I care about sitting down to watch Orange & Brown on a field of green.
Jameis Winston has given me the excitement casual fans show up on Game Day to see. I'm all-in to see what CLE can do, going forward, 2024-style.

CLE beat PIT just a couple weeks ago. I'd love to see them come out fired up, repeat- and throw this division into a state of late-season chaos.


________________


I watch football because it's one of the very last unscripted dramas that play out on weekly TV.
The march to the playoffs is a 17-week story arc with only the most minimal of episodic scripts. Anything can happen, week-to-week ("On any given Sunday"). Past performance is no guarantee of future production. Every year's trajectory is unique.


Jameis Winston makes my Sundays (...and my most recent Monday) worth the time and commitment.


Browns scored over 30 on Monday- against a top-ranked D that was predicted to shut them down.


I'm ready to watch the Cleveland Browns play the Pittsburgh Steelers (0-1 v. CLE, 2024). And if they play well, (win or lose), I'll remain committed to watching for another week, going forward.

Unlike so many years in the past, I don't dread this upcoming date with PIT.

It's December.
The Browns are last in the divisional standings.
And I still want to watch them play football.

That in itself, is different from all those years where "fans" treated Draft Day like The Best Day Just South of The Super Bowl.

It's 2024. Not 20something.

Even if the Browns lose the next game/season, they are soooo much better to watch than they were.

I hated the way CLE lost that game, but I loved the way they played that game.


.02,
clemdawg.


"too many notes, not enough music-"

#GMStong
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,473
Likes: 2089
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 12,473
Likes: 2089
Originally Posted by Ballpeen
Originally Posted by PitDAWG
That's the exact same thing many of us were saying about Flacco last year. Hopefully this FO will wake up after that huge mistake. They didn't even make him an offer to keep him here and he helped lead the Browns to the playoffs. I'm not so sure I have the confidence in this group not to make the same mistake yet again.

Last year presented strange circumstances. At the time I don't think anybody with decision power was ready to move on from Watson. Bringing Flacco back would have created a QB controversy. That was the last thing they wanted. I get why they made the decision. I would have done the same.

There was no other choice in the matter and all of the above is exactly why. But what Pit said was valid as well -- because now he's talking about next year.

If this group has an ounce of intellectual integrity, they'd keep Winston and start next year with a QB competition.

Watson has spent his entire time here hovering around The Mendoza Line. Literally, playing either poor or just a little better than poor. I don't think a single fan would object to the outright insanity of paying someone 50M to ride the pine if he can't show up and earn it in the summer.


HERE WE GO BROWNIES! HERE WE GO!!
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,167
Likes: 910
B
Legend
Offline
Legend
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,167
Likes: 910
I don't disagree.

If we have a QB competition, we will need to bring in another vet. It won't be a rookie..I hope not anyway. I'd like to see a rook get some bench time to age a bit in to the position.

Forget DTR, the guy is a scrub.


If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.

GM Strong




[Linked Image]
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 72,220
Likes: 1540
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 72,220
Likes: 1540
Originally Posted by Ballpeen
Originally Posted by PitDAWG
That's the exact same thing many of us were saying about Flacco last year. Hopefully this FO will wake up after that huge mistake. They didn't even make him an offer to keep him here and he helped lead the Browns to the playoffs. I'm not so sure I have the confidence in this group not to make the same mistake yet again.

Last year presented strange circumstances. At the time I don't think anybody with decision power was ready to move on from Watson. Bringing Flacco back would have created a QB controversy. That was the last thing they wanted. I get why they made the decision. I would have done the same.

I get that. I understand the reasoning. But as with everything in life, results matter. I think even by the end of last season they knew their future rode with watson. They went 230 million dollars all in. With their careers in the balance I believe they felt they had no choice but to ride with him for at least another season and having a QB controversy out of the gate would not have been productive.

But we see the results of what happens when desperation sets in. We see what happens when they are more concerned about a possible controversy and how the watson decision looks to the public rather than having a good contingency plan in place. Flacco already knew the O, had chemistry with the coaches and players.

So yeah I get what you're saying. But let's face it, when all is said and done, for better or worse, we are judged by the results of the decisions we make and not for the motivation on which those decisions were made.


Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,532
Likes: 192
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,532
Likes: 192
I concur with those sentiments… with Watson the only question became how badly were the Browns going to lose.

Jameis is a different story… you may lose, but you may win, and the bucket of popcorn will be empty.

The replacement for Watson (Flacco/Jameis) basically average double the yards as Watson…. Yeah that does not bode well because 2 players have done it now.

I gave up on the Watson games.. I can stick around for the current games.


"Jameis Winston: guaranteed to throw 6 TD's/game. Tune in next week to see which team benefits-"
Page 2 of 2 1 2
DawgTalkers.net Forums The Archives 2024 NFL Season Looking Back: Broncos 41 Browns 32 Post Game Thoughts

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5