This will be a merry go round discussion.
Not really. You can either show players this coaching staff didn't develop and went on the be successful elsewhere or you can't. If not it's quite obvious that 31 other teams didn't think they could develop into anything substantial either.
If we don’t draft good enough then of course it’s hard to nurture a player with a limited talent. That’s my point.
No, that was a part of your point. You then went on to blame the coaching staff for not developing those players. So which is it? They aren't drafting talent that's good enough to be developed or the coaching staff isn't developing players that could be?
It’s doesn’t matter how much you defend whatever you defend results speaks for itself. 1-6 in 2024.
Since 2020 we have regressed despite being loaded with talent when the new regime with Berry o Co took over.
What more proof do you need that we’re a dysfunctional organization.
You can't show me a single instance where I said this FO and even owner weren't dysfunctional and the results are evident. All I asked you to do is back up your point about the coaching staff not developing this talent you claim they were given to develop.
Regarding your other point about presenting proof.
We got Baker but because of an insecure leadership we let him go. Instead we gave a proven trouble maker 230m guaranteed.
Touché!
You don’t have to go further.
You mean the Baker that Stefanski led to the playoffs when he was healthy for an entire season? So he got as much out of baker when he was healthy than anyone else has in terms of leading their team to the playoffs. So I guess he did develop that talent. And who is it that makes the final decision about trades trades and cutting players again? Let me give you a clue. It's not the HC.