Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,852
Likes: 126
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,852
Likes: 126
Originally Posted by Bird
Originally Posted by Rishuz
Why do we pass it deep every 3rd and 4th and short?
Well, it used to be no matter how short we’d complete a pass that still ended up short of the first down. They would need three and they’d get two.

Running for a first down on 3rd and short? What an excellent idea.

You seemed to be laser focused.



Joe Thomas #73
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,325
Likes: 50
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,325
Likes: 50
Originally Posted by Rishuz
Why do we pass it deep every 3rd and 4th and short?
Analytics - they are KILLING this team.


Berry can go. Stefanski can go. Watson can go. Hello Mike Vrabel! Find me my GM and QB!
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 72,149
Likes: 1533
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 72,149
Likes: 1533
Or it could simply be that the opposing team their defense up close expecting the short pass or run and it opens the field up deep. But I guess catching the opposing team off guard by running a play they aren't expecting must be a bad thing, right?


Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,157
Likes: 908
B
Legend
Offline
Legend
B
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 39,157
Likes: 908
Originally Posted by jfanent
I didn't watch the game yesterday. Let me guess: Head scratching play calling, idiotic mistakes and blown calls by the refs cost us the game.

Maybe some botched calls, but overall i thought the play calling was fine and there weren't any real botched plays.

We just lost a close game. Some of the other losses were far worse than yesterdays loss.


If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.

GM Strong




[Linked Image]
1 member likes this: jfanent
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
Likes: 280
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 40,399
Likes: 280
Originally Posted by PitDAWG
Or it could simply be that the opposing team their defense up close expecting the short pass or run and it opens the field up deep. But I guess catching the opposing team off guard by running a play they aren't expecting must be a bad thing, right?
No, it's not a bad thing. How often is it successful?

Most pass plays have routes with short, intermediate, and deep options. The coach calls the play, the QB decides where to throw it.


yebat' Putin
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 72,149
Likes: 1533
P
Legend
Offline
Legend
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 72,149
Likes: 1533
I probably worded my post poorly. I understand that their are options the QB has as to which WR he throws to. Point being if the opposing defense is playing 8 or 9 men close, those short routes are probably pretty well covered. The most likely place you would find a good opportunity to throw the ball would be an intermediate or deep route.

Having Chubb the opposing defense is more than likely expecting the short run or possibly a pass play just long enough to get the 1st down. Their weakness would be the intermediate or deep pass.


Intoducing for The Cleveland Browns, Quarterback Deshawn "The Predator" Watson. He will also be the one to choose your next head coach.

#gmstrong
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 15,979
Likes: 83
T
Legend
Offline
Legend
T
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 15,979
Likes: 83
Originally Posted by The Beast
Originally Posted by Rishuz
Why do we pass it deep every 3rd and 4th and short?
Analytics - they are KILLING this team.
brownie


Can Deshaun Watson play better for the Browns, than Baker Mayfield would have? ... Now the Games count.
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,852
Likes: 126
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,852
Likes: 126
Originally Posted by Rishuz
Why do we pass it deep every 3rd and 4th and short?

because it has been done to us for years and it always, always, always works.



Joe Thomas #73
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 14,998
Likes: 1066
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 14,998
Likes: 1066
Originally Posted by BADdog
Originally Posted by Rishuz
Why do we pass it deep every 3rd and 4th and short?

because it has been done to us for years and it always, always, always works.


It works against us on 3rd and 14, too.
And 3rd and 23.
Hell... it works against us on 4th and 24, from the opponents' 12 yard line...

*EDIT*
I had to do it. So much doom & gloom on everyone's dinner plates, and Clemmy ain't really partaken of that meal.
Tastes like dirt. Not ready to commit to a 7-course meal.

Last edited by Clemdawg; 10/24/22 09:00 PM.

"too many notes, not enough music-"

#GMStong
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 15,979
Likes: 83
T
Legend
Offline
Legend
T
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 15,979
Likes: 83
because it waz a division lozz, none of the other lozzez were az bad az yezterdayz lozz,
unlezz someone iz rooting for other than the Brownz to succeed.
(by current rulez to decide the playoffz, division gamez are the mozt important.)


Can Deshaun Watson play better for the Browns, than Baker Mayfield would have? ... Now the Games count.
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 212
Likes: 15
D
Practice Squad
Offline
Practice Squad
D
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 212
Likes: 15
"You keep saying you want the HC fired but I haven’t see you give any depth of insight as to why. "

2-5 record puts you on the hot seat

losing 4 games while leading in the 4th quarter

taking our best offensive weapon (Chubb) off the field consistently in huge situations.

Not firing Joe Woods

Not firing Mike Priefer

That is 4 why's right there without trying.

Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 8
Likes: 1
D
Rookie
Offline
Rookie
D
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 8
Likes: 1
They need to lose that empty backfield formation. I cringe everytime I see it used.

1 member likes this: WSU Willie
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 73,313
Likes: 585
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 73,313
Likes: 585
Originally Posted by Dawg1979
They need to lose that empty backfield formation. I cringe everytime I see it used.
I do too. I watch the games with my dad and like clockwork, we’ll have a little momentum and then groan “ugh, empty …”


"First down inside the 10. A score here will put us in the Super Bowl. Cooper is far to the left as Njoku settles into the slot. Moore is flanked out wide to the right. Chubb and Ford are split in the backfield as Watson takes the snap ... Here we go."
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 2,864
Likes: 53
I
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
I
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 2,864
Likes: 53
Originally Posted by Dawg1979
They need to lose that empty backfield formation. I cringe everytime I see it used.
The Browns don't have the talent to run a empty backfield
Or the QB to make a hot read when that Blitzer comes in unblocked

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Likes: 906
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Likes: 906
Actually, the Browns have been successful this year out of the Empty formation. I posted something from Twitter a couple a few weeks ago about our success rate when using Empty. I can't find it on Google now, but it's on this site. Also, there is this article. It's best to click on the link so you can watch the videos, but I'll post the text anyway.


Quote
Film Room: Browns beat Steelers on Thursday night by utilizing empty looks
Share this article
248 shares
share tweet email

Cory Kinnan
September 26, 2022 3:00 pm ET
As we get ready to turn the page on Steelers’ week, we take one last look at just how the Cleveland Browns have been able to find success offensively. On an EPA per play basis, only the Philadelphia Eagles and Baltimore Ravens tout a higher success rate.

One reason for the success of the offense in Cleveland is due to the run game, which currently leads the league. However, the passing attack is just as efficient through three weeks with Jacoby Brissett under center. He is not just a quarterback sneak artist, even though he may be dynamite at them.


Buy Browns Tickets
Instead, we turn our attention to when Brissett puts the ball in the air, and specifically the success he and the Browns and head coach Kevin Stefanski have found when throwing out of empty looks (nobody in the backfield with the quarterback).

Why throwing out of empty is so efficient
Many groan when the Browns come out in empty looks, especially when the likes of running backs Nick Chubb and Kareem Hunt are split out wide. However, running empty with running backs split out wide is quite efficient and helps a quarterback discern what the opposing defense is sitting in right away.

The Browns used to run empty with former fullback Andy Janovich out wide, and for the same reasons they still throw backs out there with great success. A good place to start as to why this is so efficient is because it allows for Brissett to know if the opposing defense is in man or zone pre-snap with a high frequency.

Sure, opposing defenses could be running man coverage when they leave a cornerback out wide across from a running back, but this would be incredibly inefficient defense as someone inside would have their hands full with a gifted receiver. So most of the time when the Browns split out a running back, it is to see who aligns overtop of them.

If it is a cornerback, then it is more than likely zone coverage. If a linebacker or safety follows the back out, then it is more than likely man coverage. Another advantage to this is if Brissett sees a matchup he likes, as he did in Week 1 against the Carolina Panthers, with a running back across from a linebacker, he can take that mismatch. Against Carolina, he narrowly missed Hunt down the sideline as he dusted Panthers’ linebacker Shaq Thompson in coverage.

If the quarterback reads zone coverage out wide, then he knows he has the ability to pull the middle of the field horizontal as they try to pattern match and defend concepts, allowing for someone to find space inside. This is how David Njoku and Amari Cooper racked up yards on Thursday night against the Steelers.

Now diving into some tape, we will look at exact examples of the Browns pulling apart the Steelers by utilizing empty looks this past week.


Empty lets Jacoby Brissett speed up his trigger

Even after explaining why empty is such a great set to run, you still might hate the idea of not having Chubb or Hunt in the backfield. Regardless of those thoughts and feelings, the numbers back up Brissett’s success in these looks as he went an efficient 9-of-13 for 101 yards throwing out of empty.

Because Brissett is an intelligent quarterback and knows where to get his eyes pre-snap, empty gives him more than enough keys to frequently dish out the football on time to his initial read. Brissett was frequently on time and accurate with the football. Where he started to slow his roll is when he had to move his eyes off of his initial read.

This is why Njoku and Cooper saw so many targets on hitches over the middle of the field. Force the defense to spread out and punch them where they are exposed.

While he still was able to get his eyes where they needed to be, Brissett has historically struggled to throw with anticipation as he telegraphed a few looks. This was the case on the first quarter throw that was broken up on third down as he peeled his eyes from rookie David Bell and onto Donovan Peoples-Jones. The process was good, but slow. This allowed the sitting corner to break upfield and make a break on the football.

Overall, however, Brissett was able to identify where his eyes should be off the snap and had that look available to him.

Gallery
Look: Top photos from the Browns win over the Steelers
Cleveland Browns Jack Conklin View 34 photos

Browns have been able to isolate mismatches

When the Browns see man coverage out of empty, they and Brissett know where their playmakers are on the field. This was most apparent on the blaze out to Cooper where he was able to pick up an additional chunk of yardage after the catch.

Even though Brissett missed Cooper in the second half on an out route (on a seperate throw), they were able to get him lined up in the slot. This is a mismatch Brissett will get his eyes to every chance he gets. In fact, Cooper toasted a slot corner just last week against the Jets on a big play on a corner route in Week 2.

In the first quarter of this game, the Browns were able to isolate Njoku onto a cornerback on a clearout concept. Not only did Njoku outmuscle the Pittsburgh corner, but as one of the more athletic tight ends in the league, the defensive back was not able to hang stride-for-stride with him as he dragged across the field. This resulted in a nine yard gain and a first down on a third-and-nine.

Empty is quite a good look to get your best playmakers in the best position to make a play. And it is working quite well for the Browns.


The middle of the field is the domain of David Njoku

After getting a massive payday this offseason, the usage of Njoku had been a bit lacking up until Thursday night. Overall, Njoku went for 89 yards and a touchdown on nine catches on the night against the Steelers. To take it one step further, five of those catches and the majority of his yards came when he was targeted out of empty.

A year ago, the Browns had too many playmakers who could only win at the same level of the field. This was the case with Jarvis Landry, Austin Hooper, and Rashard Higgins all clouding the shallow middle of the field. Getting playmakers who can stretch the field a bit more, the middle of the field has turned into Njoku’s domain.

With Cooper’s ability to win at every level of the field, Peoples-Jones’ prowess along the boundary and down the field, and with Hunts’ ability to thrive in space, the passing attack of the Cleveland Browns has unmuddied the waters underneath. And this is where Njoku ran wild.

As their passing attack continues to grow, look for Njoku to continue to ravage the middle of the field as he did against the Steelers. Even key in to Njoku when the Browns come out in empty sets.


For the TL;DR crowd
The Cleveland Browns will continue to run a great deal of empty, regardless of how talented their running backs are. Besides, it is not like they are neglecting their league-leading rushing attack. Empty sets allow for Brissett and the Browns to get effective looks at defenses pre-snap in order to maximize their passing attack as well.

Right now, they are picking up first downs at an extraordinary rate on third and fourth downs, and they are doing so with a great balance of both run and pass. Much of this has to do with the efficiency that Brissett has been able to play with to start the season.

The Browns and Stefanski have been able to maximize the success of a journeyman backup quarterback mostly because they are putting him in position to succeed by giving him as much information as possible pre-snap. They have eight games left with Brissett under center, so do not expect too much to change in ways of the balance the Browns are playing with offensively.

And this is a good thing.

https://brownswire.usatoday.com/lis...thursday-night-by-utilizing-empty-looks/

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Likes: 906
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Likes: 906

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,870
Likes: 429
P
Hall of Famer
Offline
Hall of Famer
P
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 8,870
Likes: 429
The only time I hate the empty backfield is on 3rd and 1. Line up and punch them in the mouth with Chubb. Run the damn ball.


[Linked Image]
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 28,143
Likes: 832
Legend
Offline
Legend
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 28,143
Likes: 832
Originally Posted by PortlandDawg
The only time I hate the empty backfield is on 3rd and 1. Line up and punch them in the mouth with Chubb. Run the damn ball.

Aye. It isn't the fact we run the Empty, it's just that we always seem to switch to it *just* as we're building some momentum with running it... it's like we get the ball rolling with Chubb, then we pull Chubb off the field and switch to the one look that declares there is zero chance we're going to run it again just as we'd gotten them to start keying on focusing on Chubb.

It's like the phrase Quincy Carrier used "Stefanski tends to try to solve problems that don't exist, yet"


Browns is the Browns

... there goes Joe Thomas, the best there ever was in this game.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,672
Likes: 285
Dawg Talker
Offline
Dawg Talker
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,672
Likes: 285
Yea, it’s been explained at least a couple times for the past two seasons. It’s a good formation for us and benefits our QBs in many ways.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Likes: 906
V
Legend
Offline
Legend
V
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 55,499
Likes: 906
Originally Posted by PortlandDawg
The only time I hate the empty backfield is on 3rd and 1. Line up and punch them in the mouth with Chubb. Run the damn ball.

I'd agree, but I can't recall us running Empty on 3rd and 1.

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 15,979
Likes: 83
T
Legend
Offline
Legend
T
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 15,979
Likes: 83
juzt a guezz but I think they ran an empty backfield against Carolina in the opener on 3rd and 2 or 3, maybe 4th and 2 or 3, and completed a pass
successfully and other timez had the empty backfield on short yardage in that game. (juzt memory so could be wrong)


Can Deshaun Watson play better for the Browns, than Baker Mayfield would have? ... Now the Games count.
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
DawgTalkers.net Forums The Archives 2022 NFL Season Looking Back: Browns 20 Ravens 23 Post Game Thoughts

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5