Four days after he got here? No. If anything the comment was made in jest and Glazer just made a story out of it by reporting it out of context.
If I have to choose between what you think Jay Glazer said and what Jay Glazer thinks Jay Glazer said, I'm going to go with the latter.
https://www.wkyc.com/article/sports/nfl/browns/odell-beckham-jr-wanted-rams-trade/95-7a898ee3-7be9-4ab7-bc3e-1607d8d78b8f#:~:text=In%20doing%20so%2C%20Glazer%20revealed,got%20there%2C%22%20Glazer%20said.
I'll just say it one more time because I'm running out of different ways to explain it to you, and your "invent a ridiculous argument and act like I said that" shtick is already really old.
OBJ was the most talented WR on this team and his departure left a hole that couldn't be filled (commanding double-teams and opening things up for others). That said, he did not want to be here, and by that alone made it impossible for him to stay. The FO's actions seem to back this up (not acquiescing to his trade requests until the situation became untenable). Because he didn't want to be here, I do believe that we are better off without him. He was reportedly good to the guys in the locker room and was a willing blocker most of the time, but he wanted out of Cleveland. He WAS able to pick up the playbook quickly in LA... so why didn't he do that when he was here and Baker had to line him up all the time? He has great hands, so why were so many easy passes bouncing off his chest?
I'm not exactly rooting for him to get a 'chip, but I really don't harbor him much ill-will. I get why he wanted out, but he was a punk in the way he did it.